CompuServe Thread

#More Monitor Questions

18 messages in this thread
#90032From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiFeb 24, 1993 5:26 PM
Rick, Well, there's this book out called DENNY ATKIN'S BEST AMIGA TIPS AND SECRETS that has a whole chapter on stuff like what you need to look for when buying a monitor. I know the author pretty well. (grin) Seriously, though, the choices I'm familiar with: Mitsubishi Diamondscan 1381/1391 — great, but out of production and difficult to find IDEK — Mixed responses, they have a 17" for $999 Panasonic — one of their 13xx series scans down to 15kHz, and is available for under $400; probably the best deal. Commodore 1960 — I've got one and I'm very happy with it; a bit expensive, though.
#90040From: Richard GraffFeb 24, 1993 6:48 PM
Denny, Thanks for the Monitor recommends, considering my limited resources after actually buying the A1200HD and holding back some $$$ in order to get one of the GVP 1230 turbo+'s when they become available, the Panasonic 13xx series looks like I maybe able to swing it. Well, thats about the third time you have given me advice in the last 2 weeks, since I decided to get the A1200, I guess its time to actually purchase your book, its the least I could do <G>. Thanks again………….Rick
#90119From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiFeb 25, 1993 7:02 AM
Rick, I checked my references, and it's the Panasonic C1391 that scans from 15.5 to 36KHz. Don't forget you'll need Commodore's 23-15 pin VGA adaptor as well, which should be available from your dealer for about $15. Happy to help! ….Denny
#90144From: Richard GraffFeb 25, 1993 3:59 PM
Peter just sent me a message and said he was having trouble with his Panasync C1391, and also, I tried to locate one locally today with no luck, it isn't even in any of the catalogs that the computer stores can order monitors from. In fact, of 3 stores that I got to actually spend some time looking in their catalogs/price lists, they couln't find a single mulitsynch that goes down to 15khz that is in the list in the library here, except for a sony which I was quoted almost $900.00 for. I got a quote locally on the 1960 of $499.00, I may have to go that route, not that that is necessarily bad, I just like to make comparisions when i spend that kind of money <G>. =Rick=
#90186From: Christopher TolmieFeb 25, 1993 9:45 PM
Richard, I bought a Princeton Graphic Ultra 1600 multi-sync that syncs down to 15kHZ, can overscan to the screen edges with a push of a button, all panel controls are front-mounted, and I bought it fairly cheap, $450. The Ultra 1400 is a 14" monitor and it was selling for around $350 from DAMARK mailorder. I believe this item is out of stock with them now, but it wouldn't hurt to call them and/or call DAMARK Mailorder 1-800-327-6767 Princeton Graphics Systems 1125 Northmeadow Parkway Suite 120 Roswell, GA 30076 1-800-221-1490 Tech Support Ultimate Display Solutions Chris
#90249From: Richard GraffFeb 26, 1993 10:09 AM
Thanks Chris, Where did you get the Ultra 1600 for $450.00??? I called Ultimate Display Solutions and they quoted me $725.00 for the 1600 and $525.00 for the 1400. I haven't been able to get thru to Damark yet, nobody is answering the 800 number you gave me. =Rick=
#90477From: Christopher TolmieFeb 27, 1993 8:33 PM
Rick, I bought the Ultra 1600 from DAMARK mailorder for $599, then a month later they reduced the price to $450. I called 'em up told them I was on the Preferred Buyer List and they credited my credit card $150! I don't know if they still stock the monitor or not, but I feel if you can get one around that price you should move quickly and do it. I'm pretty sure that 800 number is correct, but you could call 800 Information and ask for DAMARK's 800 number. Chris
#90162From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiFeb 25, 1993 6:30 PM
Dang. I was flipping through AP messages thinking someone was finally plugging my silly book and then I look up at the name and it's just YOU. Sigh. (Hmm… talking to yourself is a sign of WHAT again?)
#90191From: Michael GerardFeb 25, 1993 10:03 PM
ROFL excuse me, Mr. Atkin… could you please keep CLASSIFIED ads in the CLASSIFIED section? 🙂
#90331From: Christopher TolmieFeb 26, 1993 9:05 PM
Denny, Once I begin reading my anxiously awaited autographed copy of your new book, I'll be able to plug it! But I keep checking the mail each day, and nothing yet. <grin> >>DENNY ATKIN'S BEST AMIGA TIPS AND SECRETS >>(***DICE***) Chris rolled (100) 100 >>;;[6] MODERATOR – was that for real? >>(1-17,Chris) yes I won! >>(1-21,sja) It appears Chris did it … Chris
#90404From: Paul ToalFeb 27, 1993 6:21 AM
You got an autographed copy of the book? Wow! That's something special. Who's autograph did you get? –Paul
#90433From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiFeb 27, 1993 1:00 PM
BTW, I'm not only easy, I'm cheap too. 🙂 Anyone can get an autographed copy of my book just by ordering it directly from COMPUTE. Just download DennyBook.Txt for info. 🙂 Speaking of the topic at hand, I hooked an Epson 17" monitor to my A4000 today for the heck of it. MAN, I wish that puppy would scan down to 15… It was wonderful. Makes me want to consider the IDEK…
#90493From: David KieltykaFeb 27, 1993 11:44 PM
Denny, I was at the local CompUSA last week, and saw a 21" Sony monitor hooked up to a Mac Quadra. Oooh, the display was beautiful! Sharp as a tack, too. When I win the Lotto I'll definitely buy one. -Dave (via AutoPilot)
#90552From: Black Belt SystemsFeb 28, 1993 1:55 PM
David, A Mac, or the monitor? <grin> –Ben …via AutoPilot
#90518From: Paul ToalFeb 28, 1993 5:38 AM
What was the first thing that intrigued you about the 17" monitor? Can you use a smaller system font, do graphics look worse because the pixels are bigger and blockier? I go find DennyBook.Txt 🙂 –Paul
#90527From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiFeb 28, 1993 9:45 AM
Paul, >>What was the first thing that intrigued you about the 17" monitor? Well, I guess it was that size DOES matter. (grin) Yep, you could use Topaz 8 instead of Topaz 11 in 640×480 mode, for instance. But I personally just thought it was more comfortable to have everything larger. I used to have almost 20/10 vision and now it's down to 20/20, and I wonder if it's staring at computer screens for the past 12 years that has done that. (Could just be age I spose. 🙂 The larger text was just more comfortable to read. I really don't think the graphics looked any worse; 17" isn't quite as drastic a jump as 19". Sure, 320×200 pixels are more noticeable, but you also tend to get more "into" games and such with the larger monitor so you don't notice the pixels because you're not staring at a computer screen, darnit, you're blasting Kilrathi scum! 🙂 …Denny
#90417From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiFeb 27, 1993 10:18 AM
Chris, It's coming…. I gave the copy to our books dept. to mail out, and they tend to only do mailings once a week. You should see it early next week, I think.
#90303From: Dave CinegeFeb 26, 1993 5:40 PM
IDEK is a VERY good monitor. Elite MicroComputers – via Whap!