CompuServe Thread

#quality of mpc sound?

16 messages in this thread
#41931From: Gregory ConranMar 4, 1993 7:17 PM
I have a problem with my quality of mpc audio. I have the following configurations: DTK 486-50, 16mb ram, 200mb ide drive, pro audio spectrum 16 sound board, nec cdr-74 external 150/300kb/sec cd-rom drive, windows 3.1 clone 386sx-33, 200mb ide drive, standard sound blaster board, chinon 150kb/sec cd-rom drive off adaptec controller (using corel's newest drivers) My problem exists with both of the above configurations (I have verified that I have the latest drivers for all components), I have set buffers of the mscdex driver to all possible settings, and the buffers in the config.sys file to all possible settings. The software that I am using are any of the following: The Animals! (software tools\works) white horse child aesops fables all of these software titles (running under windows), do not produce the quality of sound that I feel should be there. The speech quality seems to be jerky at times, with slight skips and hesitations that detracts from the quality of the playing. Both my cd configurations produce the same results. normal cd audio and any speech programs (dos based) work fine. There are absolutely NO conflicts with any other boards. I have stripped both pc's to the bone with only the boards and I have tried nearly every possible dma, irq and other settings for each cd-rom controller board. Would tweaking windows be necessary? should I buy dos based mpc programs instead of windows programs? is there any windows tweaks that would help? Am I too picky in wanting normal speech quality from these products? why do normal speech programs that come with the sound boards work better than the supposedly mpc-quality programs?
#41949From: Jack L. ChalkerMar 4, 1993 9:29 PM
There is no reason with your equipment and drivers that you are getting what you are getting. Well, there's a reason, but it's not in your hardware. I have two entirely different setups here on two main computers and don't get the sort of thing you are indicating. One question: are you running the NEC off the PAS16 or off CorelSCSI? If the former, I'd suggest you switch to the latter and Update CorelSCSI to handle it instead. The PAS16 SCSI connector is not a full-featured one and tends to slow down the drive. If sound is the problem, and your drivers are current, the most logical explanation is either a driver conflict or a DMA or IRQ conflict. First of all, have you excluded the memory address used by your SCSI device(s) in both CONFIG.SYS and SYSTEM.INI? Both are necessary. Second, check out the DMA and IRQ addresses used by various things in your system and compare them to what the PAS16 is set for. If two things are trying to use the same DMA or interrupt, you'll get breakups, bizarre results, etc. The only other possibility is memory. Multimedia chews up memory like mad; you may be on your system's borderline, not enough to trigger an out of memory but enough to slow things down in the swapping.
#42050From: Gregory ConranMar 5, 1993 7:15 PM
I am running the nec off of the pa16, I tried removing the emm driver to see if any region needed to be excluded – no luck, I have avout 590k free memory after loading all of the drivers – so I don't think memory is the problem. I have really tried every possible interrupt and dma channel. I just don't know what to do. It seems that the sound if 99% there. I would think that a dma or int conflict would cause static or lots of problems, not the hesitation and slight jerkiness that I see. Perhaps a full windows re-installation may help…
#42176From: Jack L. ChalkerMar 7, 1993 5:53 AM
No, no. When I'm talking Windows I mean MEMORY, not how much LOW memory you have. Total memory in the system. Windows hogs the low memory; it runs programs in expanded memory blocks, which is why you need so much memory to do so little. It has been my experience that less than 4 meg is not practical if you place any demands, let alone multimedia, on WIN31; 8 meg is much better and should do for the vast majority of people. Other than a defect in the card (always a possibility) there is simply no reason other than a conflict or driver problem that you're not getting nice sound. I assume you have the latest drivers, and that you deleted the old drivers in Control Panel and reinstalled the latest ones from scratch? Have you tried another DMA channel or IRQ you are positive is not being used by anything anywhere anyhow? I was thinking that there's a statement that can be put in SYSTEM.INI involving DMA sharing; I know it's in mine. If I think of it, I'll include it here when I get a chance to peek in my SYSTEM.INI and check. Shared DMA is the #1 cause of the symptoms you describe. Also, is your sound cord okay? Have you tried replacing the sound cords in case there's an internal short or break? I know how frustrating these things can be; we should be able to find the culprit SOMEWHERE.
#42217From: Gregory ConranMar 7, 1993 4:59 PM
thanks – I have never played with the shared dma, although I have tried all possible working combinations with the board. I have 20mb in the system (4-4mb simms and 4-1mb simms) on the mb. I had put all of the possible exclude paramaters that I could think of. the only program that I think could have affected my windows (that obviously was uninstalled when I deleted my entire windows config) was a cosession windows setup that modified the screen, kb, and system lines. I'll have to make a full backup before trying it again and see if it causes problems with the cd-rom drives…..hmmmm.
#42064From: Gregory ConranMar 5, 1993 10:00 PM
well I tried all of the suggestions, and then said "s____ this" and deleted all of my windows files and re-installed windows fully. It seems to have solved the problem. all of the mpc apps work without skips, hops, hesitations, etc. really weird…
#42177From: Jack L. ChalkerMar 7, 1993 5:53 AM
Nope; this sort of thing happens. Windows is basically a klude, not a real OS, and one of its biggest drawbacks is that it constantly writes to and rewrites SYSTEM.INI and WIN.INI files as do a lot of other programs, many without telling you about it. Clearly something stepped on some needed command or driver; when you reinstalled the defaults were restored. At least you're going now, and that's all that counts.
#42218From: Gregory ConranMar 7, 1993 5:01 PM
really! I was beginning to doubt my system and components – especially since I do this sort of thing for a living…. kind of makes one wonder how reliable hardware and software really is with all of the possibilities….. I hope that windows nt is going to give us something better. I guess os/2 is always an option…
#42267From: Jack L. ChalkerMar 8, 1993 5:06 AM
Well, OS/2 2.1 is certainly a rock solid OS that delivers what it promises. Alas, it doesn't support my expensive graphics card and handles a vital SCSI device driver only in a DOS session so I really can't stick with it, and it would be far more of a knockout if there were more programs taking advantage of its multithreading. What it does have, though, makes you feel sad that IBM and MicroSoft went in different directions on it. MicroSoft has never put out a good version 1 of anything and I don't expect NT to be any different, even if they are calling it 3.1 instead of 1.0. A rose is a rose. The question there is twofold: NT is an OS, not a kludge shell, based on the same Unix mach 3 kernel as OS/2. Driver and video support will be as much of a question with NT as with OS/2, and, unlike OS/2, which doesn't hedge about running Windows, NT is only guaranteed to run what MicroSoft determines is the "top 100" WIN31 apps. That means whole new versions of most software, and by the time they come out we'll have the WIN32 kernel for Windows which will run NT apps under DOS Windows on a 486 or better. Indeed, some at MicroSoft on the latter project think it'll cripple or kill NT except for extensive networks. At any rate, anybody who installs NT without the dual boot option and with its high performance file system rather than the DOS one is going to have real surprises at what they won't be able to run!
#42404From: Peter VerkleyMar 9, 1993 4:41 AM
Gregory, at last, a fellow sufferer! I did the same thing the first weekend this month when experiencing serious trouble when trying to install MPC: kill Windows and all INIs and reinstalled 3.1 and W4WG, a real PITA. And then all relevant apps. Took me 16 hours (200Mb+), but everything works now. I suspect that various bits and pieces from old and deleted sound progs (Whoopie, SB 2 Pro-sold that card-, & some other shareware) made the whole installation unstable. We need a general uninstall watchdog in Win 3.2, so any application installed can be uninstalled and all changes in the system undone. Windows beats SF for weirdness sometimes! (with apologies to Jack if he is who I think he is) Regards Black Peter
#42065From: Gregory ConranMar 5, 1993 10:00 PM
I am definately going to try your suggestion and put the adaptec controller in the computer and use it rather than the pa16 to see if it speeds up the drive.
#42178From: Jack L. ChalkerMar 7, 1993 5:53 AM
Well, although I've always run my own system that way, we have another MultiMedia system here that uses a PAS16 and NEC83 and was somewhat jerky on the AVI playback. Playback still isn't 100%, but it's pretty good since I stuck an ASPI manager and SCSI card in and changed the 83 to that. Credit does not go to me; I think it was Bob R here who suggested it and I just took his advice, found he had something there, and so passed it on.
#42220From: Gregory ConranMar 7, 1993 5:02 PM
so the pro audio board just doesn't give the full performance like an adaptec board? I wonder how much better it would be with cd-speedway? I have purchased it (waiting for it to arrive) – anyone ever use it? Is it beneficial?
#42268From: Jack L. ChalkerMar 8, 1993 5:06 AM
I've never used it, but Speedway is a CDR specific cache buffer. If your CDR buffer is less than 64K as many earlier and OEM models are, you'll see some improvement; if it's already 64K you probably won't notice anything but a loss of the TSR's size in memory. On fully MPC compliant CDRs, Speedway should have no discernable effect.
#42221From: Gregory ConranMar 7, 1993 5:03 PM
do you also write books? I seem to recall your name being rather prominent around the sf section of major bookstores…
#42269From: Jack L. ChalkerMar 8, 1993 5:06 AM
Yes, I write books for a living in between online sessions. This is for my Junior Pournelle Merit Badge….