CompuServe Thread

DMS DISK MASHER v 1.11

8 messages in this thread
#92497From: Michael GerardMar 18, 1993 3:49 PM
New in Library 16 (after 2:00 am EST): [73260,1634] *New Upload (00:13:16 EST)* DMS111.SFX/Bin Bytes: 40960, Count: 0, 16-Mar-93 Title : Disk Masher version 1.11 – Whole Disk Compression Keywords: DMS DISK MASHER COMPRESSION VERSION 1.11 ARCHIVE WARP This is the latest version of the DISK MASHER (v. 1.11) which does whole disk compression. It is a self-extracting archive which is freely redistributable with a registration fee for those who decide to use it. Archives created with this version of the program are not extractable using earlier versions.
#92513From: Christopher TolmieMar 18, 1993 6:47 PM
Michael, I had uploaded this very same archive a couple weeks ago, and before that I uploaded it back in November. Chris
#92536From: Michael GerardMar 18, 1993 11:35 PM
Chris… I thought you did. Haven't we been looking for 1.12 (if it exists)? I'll have to look to see if we're getting duplicates in the lib now… I didn't check before I released it. Thanks for pointing it out.
#92574From: Harry CallesisMar 19, 1993 4:18 PM
Michael – I have a GUI version 1.14 (besides the gadget interface it's supposed to be faster) that I found on a local BBS. I'm not sure if it's legit or not. If you like, I can upload it and you can decide. Harry
#92575From: Christopher TolmieMar 19, 1993 4:27 PM
Harry, The GUI windows version of Diskmasher is for registered owners of Diskmasher (CLI) version. It says so right in the opening screen. Chris
#92608From: Michael GerardMar 20, 1993 12:59 AM
Please do Harry… and we'll take a gander. opps… just saw Chris' msg… if your opening screen is the same… well, don't bother with the upload.
#92678From: Harry CallesisMar 21, 1993 12:55 AM
Michael – I just checked it out, and as I told Chris in EMail it looks like a disassembled and improved pirate version. There's no notice of it being a registered version, the text has probably been changed – I don't see anything that looks like an "opening screen", just the main requestor. So I guess I won't be uploading 8^). Harry
#92701From: Michael GerardMar 21, 1993 10:08 AM
ok… thanks for checking!