CompuServe Thread

#Best Word Processor

10 messages in this thread
#44750From: Alex BakerDec 29, 1991 5:06 PM
Arrgggh! Just what we need, another program with proprietary fonts. I welcomed the arrival of Pagestream, because it allowed the use of scalable fonts on non-postscrpt printers. However, there is only so much room on my hard drive, and to have to replicate the same fonts in different programs only makes it worse. Since WB 2 supports AGFA fonts, it would be real nice it they would also. – Well Whap! Me Silly….
#44850From: Steven D. KapplinDec 30, 1991 7:14 PM
Alex, I assume you were referring to FinalCopy? I agree. Although it's a very good program, it's a shame that developers can't just use what's here and proven instead of going the route of something proprietary.
#45122From: Alex BakerJan 2, 1992 9:36 PM
I wasn't referring to final copy directly, (I've never used it), my comments were of a general nature. If a program supports only proprietary fonts, I am unlikely to buy it. I haven't found anything to cause me to throw out my current software, and I am not about to go through all the expense to duplicate all the fonts I currently have, for one piece of software. (Unless of course it could do strange and wonderful things, that no other piece of software could, and I couldn't live without it.) – Well Whap! Me Silly….
#45141From: Steven D. KapplinJan 2, 1992 11:28 PM
Alex, I can't disagree with you. I think you're quite right. Especially now that 2.04 is out and the system fully supports outline fonts, there's no reason for software not to fully utilize what's there, rather than re-inventing the wheel.
#45150From: Michael GerardJan 3, 1992 12:07 AM
>"If a program supports only proprietary fonts, I am unlikely to buy it."< Alex: Boy, do I agree 100%. Between special fonts, special drivers, special libraries, it is amazing that my programs can find anything they need to operate. And our system (Amiga) is much better of than PC/MSDOS! – Whapp!ng from the North Coast Michael
#45241From: RENE LEBLANCJan 3, 1992 11:25 PM
I attended a presentation by the authors of Final Copy. They developed proprietary fonts for two reasons: 1. When they began development of the program, Commodore had not yet announced their decision to make the AGFA fonts a standard. 2. The AGFA fonts take much longer to render than Final Copy's proprietary fonts. They essentially render their fonts on the fly, and on a standard Amiga 500 that program just blasted the text up on the screen like regular bitmapped fonts.
#45290From: Alex BakerJan 4, 1992 3:34 PM
I'm sure they had a reason to create their own fonts. (Nobody would do that just for fun. Believe me! <g>) Wonder if their fonts are hinted for quality reproduction at small sizes on low res devices. (laser jets are considered low res at around 8 points.) Speedier screen displays are not a reason for me to switch. Proprietary fonts have a way of receiving little third party support. (ie. Pagestream internal fonts are found only from Pagestream, or a few shareware/PD suppliers off BBS's (and those off the BBS's are of varying quality.) On the other hand, there are tons of Postscript fonts, of high quality, from lots of vendors. (Not to mention the Shareware/PD off BBS's, which are also of varying quality. But the Shareware fonts seem to be good for the most part, because there is more competition, and more familiarity with the font structure.)
#45298From: RENE LEBLANCJan 4, 1992 5:46 PM
I agree that having a hard-disk full of a myriad of different font systems is definitely a disadvantage, but I can understand the Final Copy designer's problem. I have to say, their product is VERY impressive. It is a ProWritelike word-processor — VERY convenient to use compared with desktop publishing programs, and yet provides a lot of capability for fonts and graphics that meet the needs of most applications without the burden of the DTP type packages. I am sticking with ProWrite for now, trying to use the CGFonts converted by Fountain. This yields VERY good results on my Panasonic KX-P1124, BUT the Fountain font conversion isn't perfect, and does not convert certain characters, including ' and ", which is very unfortunate! I also have ProPage 2.1, and I get perfect results with that using the CGFonts, but it isn't a convenient program to use for most letters and memos.
#45362From: Soft-Logik Tech SupportJan 5, 1992 3:23 PM
Alex: There are actually lots of commercial fonts in PageStream's proprietary format available. Computer Safari sells 25 disks of 3-4 fonts each, FontAbility has 6 disks I think, Sol Guber sells 40 or so fonts, Dennis Palumbo sells 5 disks of 3 fonts each (very high quality), Cherry Fonts (now distributed by CodeHead) are being translated for PageStream, (extremely high quality), MS Designs sells 80 or so PageStream fonts, etc… There are hundreds of fonts available in PageStream format from commercial developers. Mike Soft-Logik Tech Support
#45398From: RENE LEBLANCJan 5, 1992 9:27 PM
Thanks for the info. I don't have PageStream, myself, but I'll pass it on to friends who do.