CompuServe Thread

#I'm back

8 messages in this thread
#43139From: Jack L. ChalkerMar 15, 1993 9:31 PM
Well, we have more lawyers per capita in the U.S. than any other country and they want business. While there are some really nasty features in the British civil system, they do have one thing I wish we had here–you can get creamed in British courts for bringing substantially the same complaints time after time and losing (i.e. nuisance suits). Not here. Everybody's got the right to sue, everybody does at the drop of a lawyer, and huge numbers of lawyers actually advertise on television with "There's no fee unless we win" guarantees on certain common suits. And we wonder why insurance rates are so high here. However, in the case of being denied service without legal cause you come under the Civil Rights Act; that means the state and federal government will actually sue on your behalf!
#43207From: Adrian Godfrey [D]Mar 16, 1993 12:56 PM
Jack, Even with that, the backlog of cases in the British courts is still pretty severe. Not only that, you're faced with two sets of fees, one for the solicitor (ie the guy you go to see in his office) and the barrister (ie the Perry Mason type who conducts your case in Court) Most people are probably like me ie mental note never to visit that place again and spread the word amongst your friends and business contacts. The whole legal process just takes so long, it's really not worth the hassle. Adrian
#43263From: Jack L. ChalkerMar 17, 1993 5:20 AM
Well, I happen to like the barrister/solicitor system, particularly since 90% of all legal matters don't really take a court appearance at all and the last person I'd like defending me for murder would be my tax attorney! Legal costs are horrendous almost everywhere, and backups, particularly in civil courts, are notorious all over. We have more than enough lawyers; we need more judges.
#43294From: Adrian Godfrey [D]Mar 17, 1993 5:14 PM
Jack, I think if we had less laws, that would help<g>. Obviously you still need what was the Common Law (theft, murder etc), but can _anyone_ honestly say they've _never_ broken a law? There are just so many ways of falling foul of the statutes even unintentionally and _without_ malice. Adrian
#43418From: Jack L. ChalkerMar 18, 1993 11:07 PM
Most laws, like most taxes, aren't designed to do what they claim but rather something else. Just as taxes are used to control behavior more than raise revenue (or at least as much), most laws like the speed laws and much of the civil code are used to raise revenue–not just for the governments involved but also for attorneys and a whole support system for them. Remember that the vast majority of legislators in most democratic states are lawyers before they run and will be lawyers after they are voted out.
#43541From: Adrian Godfrey [D]Mar 20, 1993 8:56 AM
Jack, Well-known English (UK) expression: "The law is an ass( = donkey, mule)". I think that expression actually originated from a judge! Adrian
#43699From: Jack L. ChalkerMar 22, 1993 4:25 AM
Actually, that quotation is universal at least amongst English-speaking peoples, nor is the sentiment exactly new. It was Shakespeare, after all, who had Hamlet say, "First, let's kill all the lawyers."
#43874From: Adrian Godfrey [D]Mar 23, 1993 4:30 PM
Jack, From time to time I see a rash of lawyer jokes in various forums here on CI$. Adrian