CompuServe Thread

#Backtalk problem

9 messages in this thread
#45479From: Jeffrey SeidelJan 6, 1992 10:39 PM
Hi, I'm having a problem with Backtalk. I just fully converted over to WB2.04 (the ROM chip,etc). I transferred all of the Backtalk files to their recommended directories. Now if I try to change the font to anything but the 2 resident fonts (Topaz 8/9) the system locks up with a 8000 0003 error message. I've run fixfonts, increased Backtalks stack, and run diagnostics on my RAM…all OK, but still it crashes. I've accessed the fonts from other programs and all run fine. I'm running Backtalk 1.51 on a stock A2000 on a GVP hard drive. Any help or suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks, Jeff
#45487From: Steve AhlstromJan 6, 1992 11:55 PM
Jeff, No idea — BackTalk was written under 2.0 and I (occassionally) use the new outline fonts — so it does work fine. Double check your configuration file.
#45932From: Jeffrey SeidelJan 11, 1992 8:08 PM
Steve, The problem disappeared when I stopped using FR_BYPASS in my startup-sequence. I did d/l Khalid's latest version of it and tried that but still got a crash when selecting a font. Things run fine without it but every time I use BT with FR_BYPASS and select a font… I lock up (8000 0003). Jeff
#45949From: Steve AhlstromJan 12, 1992 1:18 AM
If you're running under 2.0 you shouldn't be using his file requester anyway — use a real font requester (that comes standard in 2.0).
#45965From: John PendergrassJan 12, 1992 11:39 AM
Hey, I *like* Khalid's FR, even in 2.0. A *real* file requestor, like ASL? Not bad, but gimme Khalid's any day. 🙂 –jp–seattle–
#45976From: Steve AhlstromJan 12, 1992 12:56 PM
John, Reread what I said — FONT REQUESTER.
#45992From: John PendergrassJan 12, 1992 4:31 PM
Whoops. Sorry.
#45973From: William CageJan 12, 1992 12:35 PM
Jeff, I use an offline mail reader and I found that I get the same problem. I was able to clear it up by getting rid of FR_BYPASS. Must be a bug in that program. Bill – via Whap!
#45490From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJan 7, 1992 12:10 AM
Jeff, I'm using BT just fine under 2.04. Fonts works just fine…my only guess is that perhaps one of the new libraries didn't get copied over? Look and see what version you have of the diskfont.library (in LIBS:). IT should be 37.58. You can find out what version it is by typing in a CLI. version libs:diskfont.library Don