CompuServe Thread

#Mac/Win crosspltform Dev

20 messages in this thread
#163538From: David F. JohnsonMar 12, 1994 11:09 AM
I'm not sure, but I believe MSVC will run under Windows 3.1 with Win32s or Win32c. Regardless, it seems likely that they'd make it available under Chicago (i.e., Windows 4.0). I think the main reason for using NT is speed and protection during the development process. A powerhouse PC isn't too expensive, and if you get Windows _and_ Macintosh applications out of it it's more than worth it!
#163579From: Neil Ticktin/MacTech MagMar 12, 1994 4:34 PM
>> A powerhouse PC isn't too expensive Guess you haven't priced out the system needed lately, have you? Estimates are $5,000 for a minimal system. And, that doesn't even get a large screen that most Macintosh developers would demand. You should know about a little product called PowerPC based Macintosh that Apple is coming out with. This "toy" product is way cheaper (as far as bang for buck) than an NT system.
#163684From: SyndesisMar 13, 1994 1:11 PM
Did he say Power PC or "powerhouse PC"?
#163755From: Neil Ticktin/MacTech MagMar 13, 1994 8:09 PM
John, He said "powerhouse PC" I believe. Thanks, Neil
#163836From: SyndesisMar 14, 1994 8:35 AM
That's what I thought. I put together my "powerhouse PC" for, hmm, about $4,000, but that's a 19" monitor, 3401 CDROM, 1.2 gig disk, 16 megs, and a 486/66, high-end SCSI, networking, and a pricey video card. A thousand here, a thousand there, pretty soon you're talking real money. 🙂
#163947From: Neil Ticktin/MacTech MagMar 14, 1994 7:48 PM
John, >> A thousand here, a thousand there, pretty soon you're talking real money. And the worst part is your system would need another 16Meg of RAM (for 32Meg total) to bring it up to *minimum* levels to handle the Microsoft stuff. Pretty sad situation — you have a pretty hot system. Good luck, Neil Ticktin Editor-in-Chief MacTech Magazine (formerly MacTutor)
#163969From: David F. JohnsonMar 14, 1994 9:44 PM
John, "I put together my "powerhouse PC" for, hmm, about $4,000, but that's a 19" monitor, 3401 CDROM, 1.2 gig disk, 16 megs, and a 486/66, high-end SCSI, networking, and a pricey video card. A thousand here, a thousand there, pretty soon you're talking real money. :-)" How much would it cost to get an equivalent Macintosh setup? At least as much, or more? David
#164043From: SyndesisMar 15, 1994 10:10 AM
I'm not about to try to compare the '040 with the 486/66. So much depends on other factors. Right now, I run a Mac IIci with 20M RAM, 1.4 gig hard disk, 24-bit video, networking, CD, scanner. And the current Mac product line boggles my mind, I don't know which is the "top of the line" these days.
#164190From: David F. JohnsonMar 16, 1994 9:19 AM
John, The recently released PowerPC models would be top of the line, though until the software you need runs in native mode you'd probably be taking a performance hit. A Quadra 800 is probably the faster 68k machine available. David
#164164From: Neil Ticktin/MacTech MagMar 16, 1994 3:04 AM
David, >> How much would it cost to get an equivalent Macintosh setup? At least as much, or more? Try less — the factually correct answer.
#163846From: David F. JohnsonMar 14, 1994 8:44 AM
Neil, I am the proud owner of a Compaq Prolinea 4/50 (80486 @ 50mHz) which, with monitor, keyboard, intenal data/fax modem, large hard disk, eight megs of RAM, etc. costs less than $2500. And, I bought it a year ago! I'm well aware of the PowerPC coming out, and have not nor do not consider it a "toy". I'll own one of them soon enough. David
#163950From: Neil Ticktin/MacTech MagMar 14, 1994 7:48 PM
David, >> I am the proud owner of a Compaq Prolinea 4/50 (80486 @ 50mHz) which, with monitor, keyboard, intenal data/fax modem, large hard disk, eight megs of RAM, etc. costs less than $2500. And, I bought it a year ago! My point isn't that you don't have a good quality system for a nominal amt of money. My point is that your quality system isn't anywhere what you'll need for Wingz. You'll need to spend roughly double what you spent a year ago and that will only bring you to the *minimum* system. Good luck, Neil Ticktin Editor-in-Chief MacTech Magazine (formerly MacTutor)
#163978From: David F. JohnsonMar 14, 1994 10:04 PM
Neil, "My point isn't that you don't have a good quality system for a nominal amt of money. My point is that your quality system isn't anywhere what you'll need for Wingz. You'll need to spend roughly double what you spent a year ago and that will only bring you to the *minimum* system." Well, when I get MSVC 2 I'll let you know what I end up hardware-wise. David
#163682From: SyndesisMar 13, 1994 1:11 PM
Yes, MSVC-32 will run under Win 3.1 with Win32s in place. It'll even run at the regular DOS prompt in command-line-mode; it has its own DOS extender built-in.
#163848From: David F. JohnsonMar 14, 1994 8:44 AM
John, "Yes, MSVC-32 will run under Win 3.1 with Win32s in place. It'll even run at the regular DOS prompt in command-line-mode; it has its own DOS extender built-in." But will MSVC 2 run in the same environments? David
#163887From: SyndesisMar 14, 1994 2:03 PM
I don't know… I haven't seen much about the new cross-platform stuff. What's the name of the company that you did the Corel contracting with?
#163974From: David F. JohnsonMar 14, 1994 10:04 PM
John, "What's the name of the company that you did the Corel contracting with?" Can't say, or at least I don't feel comfortable with the question. It may not (i.e., probably does not) matter, but it might. David
#164044From: SyndesisMar 15, 1994 10:11 AM
Sounds like some of the non-disclosures I've signed, which make it seem like you can't even tell yourself what you're doing. 🙂
#164090From: Howard OakleyMar 15, 1994 3:40 PM
..or if you ever found out what you were doing, you'd have to shoot yourself <g>. Howard.
#164191From: David F. JohnsonMar 16, 1994 9:19 AM
John, "Sounds like some of the non-disclosures I've signed, which make it seem like you can't even tell yourself what you're doing. :-)" That's funny! David