CompuServe Thread

#SCSI Quantum Help

22 messages in this thread
#135622From: Mark KramerMar 11, 1994 10:23 PM
HELP! I have a Quantum 245 meg SCSI drive that is acting strange. I run the format (high level) command and it gets to the very last track, trys to validate the drive then dumps outand says "Not a Dos disk in device Dh0". Every program that I have tried that claims to low level format seems to say the drive is ok but I'm not so sure. It seems like it would take longer than 30 secs to low level format. BTW It's not the controller, my other drive works fine. Thanks Mark
#135624From: Don Curtis/SYSOPMar 11, 1994 10:39 PM
Mark, Sounds like you may have told the prep software (HDToolBox or equivalent) that the drive is one cylinder bigger than it really is. Try cutting it back by one cylinder. Many drives won't actually low level format…but they have to accept the command so you don't get an error…but you get a real quick return <grin>. Don
#135947From: Mark KramerMar 15, 1994 7:05 AM
Thanks for the reply but the cylinders are the same as when it worked before. I think I may have a garbage drive. I sent a Quantum back to GVP about 6 months after I bought it (combo unit) and they sent me this one. I had different problems with this one so I called Quantum and they sent me a new rom for the drive. Everything worked about 8 months then All 3 partitions lost the bitmap and gave me checksum errors. I would agree about the extra cylinder but any size partition won't high level. I'll never by a SCSI quantum again! Hell the old palamax I had on my old 500 was just as good as this thing…. What do common folks do with problems like these? I repair this stuff every day.. I wonder how they survive….
#136042From: Ed RoosMar 16, 1994 9:17 AM
Sorry to hear of your Quantum troubles, I have had my Q-105 for 3 – 4 years w/o any probs whatsoever. I have replaced it w/ a Maxtor 345s only because I could not get a Quantum of that size. Sure hope your luck improves. ED R.
#136133From: daniel stripesMar 17, 1994 2:46 AM
>…I have had my Q-105 for 3 – 4 years w/o any probs whatsoever. I have >replaced it w/ a Maxtor 345s only because I could not get a Quantum of >that size. Does this mean that you now have a Quantum 105 SCSI drive for sale?
#136284From: Ed RoosMar 18, 1994 10:00 AM
Dan, I'm sorry to say that I plan to run both drives in my Amiga 2000 The big one on the Amiga side and the small one one on the 386SX BB side.
#136358From: daniel stripesMar 19, 1994 3:12 AM
You can't fault one for asking…can you? Thanks!
#136258From: daniel wolfMar 18, 1994 1:24 AM
There IS a brand new Quantum product – a LPS 340 meg FAST SCSI2 drive at very attractive price now available. So Quantum now does have something attractive in that size/capacity range. If interested, just EMail me for more info.
#136285From: Ed RoosMar 18, 1994 10:03 AM
Sure wish I'd known that earlier, have already bought a Maxtor 345. Hard Drive International in Arizona told me there was no 340 size available in Quantum. How long has the LPS 340 meg been out? I sure would have gotten it had I known. Thanks anyway, ED R.
#136328From: daniel wolfMar 18, 1994 10:48 PM
Brand new from Quantum. Getting our first ones in next week. Maybe been available about 7 to 10 days now. What'd they sock you for the Maxtor 7345s? I also like the Maxtor 540S I use in my A4000 (on a 4091). It is super super fast and now the price is very very attractive for a ultra high tech 500 meg FScsi2.
#136316From: Mark KramerMar 18, 1994 8:37 PM
I never heard of any troubles except with the LPS245 series. I have had a lot!! I have a Maxtor now and it seems to run great. Thanks for the luck. Mark
#136336From: daniel wolfMar 18, 1994 11:08 PM
interesting – some Maxtors are wonderful on Amiga, but I've heard some of the newer IDE Maxtors don't spin up fast enough for a cold boot on A4000. Anyone out there with more info on that issue?
#136379From: Christian BusseMar 19, 1994 10:15 AM
Daniel, I don't know about the IDE Maxtors but I have an SC7120 SCSI drive which rarely come to life anymore since I installed a Quantum LPS240 in my A2000 with the Quantum on SCSI ID #6 and the Maxtor ID #0, both internally with a SCSI ribbon cable with two plugs on it. Have I missed out on something when adding the second drive, or might it be that my A2000's PSU doesn't give enough "oomph" to get the Maxtor going anymore (what with a CSA-MMR/512KB SROM/4MB SRAM, 4MB FastMem board, Multi I/O board, Merlin graphics board, and Evolution SCSI host adaptor in the machine…)?
#136397From: daniel wolfMar 19, 1994 1:51 PM
If your power supply were dropping low enough that it affected the Maxtor 7120S, then I suppose it would be low enough that nothing would work at all! I'd check out the Maxtor separately outside your system and get it replaced if under warranty and it turns out to have flaked on you. I have a A2000 much more loaded than yours. I'll bet the 7120 is coming up late and not noticed by the SCSI controller – maybe you can set the scsi controller to give the drives more time to spin up.
#136615From: Christian BusseMar 21, 1994 5:45 PM
the Maxtor seems ok enough, it even comes on again fairly regular now after having abandoned me for a few months… <g> The first symptoms back then really were that I had to warm-boot after a cold-boot if I wanted the Maxtor a appear, but a short time later the Maxtor wouldn't start at all. Sometimes, after having worked on the machine for a few hours, suddenly the Maxtor would spin up, more often than not if I had just inserted a floppy disk(?!)… On the other hand, it would just as well stop somewhere in the middle of something and not come on again. What about "termination resistors" or whatever these are called? I used to have the Maxtor as my only drive and just sort of plonked the Quantum in between the host adaptor and the Maxtor without changing anything on the drives or the hast adaptor. SHOULD I have done something? // Chris coming in from Germany \X/ on AutoPilot 1.061……….
#136639From: gary ludwickMar 21, 1994 10:17 PM
Chris, The only thing you should have done is remove the termination resisters on the Quantum. If you didn't, then that may very well account for the Maxtor problems…if the system assumes the Quantum is the "end of the line" and stops looking further.
#136701From: Christian BusseMar 22, 1994 7:08 PM
Gary, right, I should have removed the resistors – WHAT resistors? Any hints? Sadly enough, the scrap of paper I received with my Quantum LPS240 didn't tell me ANYTHNG about resistors or, takling about that, the jumper layout. Anyone out there who can tell me which jumer does what on the thing? Thanks, // Chris coming in from Germany \X/ on AutoPilot 1.061……….
#136740From: daniel wolfMar 23, 1994 4:30 AM
I think you probably DO NEED TO DO SOMETHING to check if you have your chain of drives properly terminated. If the Quantum is 'in between' then it should not have termination resistors. And the Maxtor SHOULD have them if it is at the END of the chain. Please check the Quantum and REMOVE terminators on the Quantum if they are still there. If performance changes, please reply.
#136451From: Trent HawkinsMar 20, 1994 12:57 AM
Mark, =>I never heard of any troubles except with the LPS245 series. I have had =>a lot!! Oh oh!! Specifically what kind of problems? I have a Quantum LPS245, and while it has run for over 2 months without a hitch, what would I have to look out for? Trent "If in doubt, empty the magazine"
#136257From: daniel wolfMar 18, 1994 1:22 AM
I've sold LOTS of hard drives in the last 3 years and found that all the large manufacturers (Quantum, Maxtor, Micropolis, Seagate, Conner, etc.) seem to make very high quality products. NOTHING is perfect and failure of any mechanical device can occur without warning. My experiences with Quantum have been superb. One old 40meg SCSI ran continously for 3.5 years until I retired it to make room for something beefier. I think your Quantum problems are probably NOT reflective of overall Quantum quality. That may not assuage hard feelings now, but … hope your luck turns around. Some Quantum 240's early on were definitely NOT Amiga compatible, but that has definitely been fixed.
#136320From: Mark KramerMar 18, 1994 9:36 PM
I've had 2 Quantum LPS 245's and both failed. Makes one wonder. I guess some people like Fords, some Chevy, etc. Just seems like the two I had were Garbage!
#136333From: daniel wolfMar 18, 1994 10:59 PM
Being in the business of selling lots of data storage equipment I'm much more interested in performance/price/quality/warranty than personal tastes of my own. Not to say I lack my own preferences. But the more I work with different types of drives and learn of their behavior from customer feedback, I'd have to say that ALL the big makers do a very very good job, especially on the newer technology drives. I hope your Q240S drives were still under the standard Quantum 2year wty when they went bye-bye. Quantum is excellent about repair/replacement (at least through bona fide resellers, my own experience). There are lots of fairly fly-by-night folks out there selling questionable product (third-party refurbs, used but cleaned ane repackaged, etc.). I have seen everything in the book in the three years I've been handling disk drives. I've learned WHERE to buy is as important as WHAT to buy. Sometimes PRICE isn't everything. Others have said this, but I can't feel more strongly – BUY FROM REPUTABLE PEOPLE. It isn't worth taking a chance with your system and/or livelihood to save $50 on a $300-500 purchase.