CompuServe Thread

#Mega-midget racer

15 messages in this thread
#135670From: Karl F. KugelMar 12, 1994 10:36 AM
The 8 meg version is a new board, not an upgrade (the memory is soldered in). I believe there is a 16 Meg version of the DRAM board available too. Memory World here in the U.S. is a good source for CSA products. -Karl Speaking from the Rubble.
#135716From: John M. VreelandMar 12, 1994 9:50 PM
I think the 16 Meg is just for slingshot, as CSA didn't mention it (I'd have bought it if they did). The only problem with it now is the inability to put 3.1 in SROM. I'll have to look into replacing the half-meg SROM. I assume that's why CSA didn't solder it in, though they did solder the DRAM. -Vree in Virginia
#135763From: Karl F. KugelMar 13, 1994 11:21 AM
If you find out, let me know. I hadn't even thought about the SROM size before, and I'd hate to give up that speed increase. -Karl Speaking from the Rubble.
#135815From: Robert LittleMar 13, 1994 6:16 PM
I'm using my mmr with no SRAM. I use CPU (C= supplied) to move ROM into DRAM. A very noticable gain in speed. Of course, it didn't seem to speed anything up before I put in a 'real' 68030 w/MMU. It seems like that should still work even if the image is larger…? Robb
#136200From: Christian BusseMar 17, 1994 6:02 PM
Robb, I have tried both and I must say, everything's noticably faster if the OS is in SROM than in DRAM. And you don't need a CPU with MMU, CSA's little tool fixes this for you… ;^) // Chris coming in from Germany \X/ on AutoPilot 1.061……….
#136347From: John M. VreelandMar 19, 1994 1:10 AM
It should work fine with dos 3.0 in DRAM but that steals some of my precious contiguous memory away. Then what do I do with a half meg of SRAM? It's okay. Imagine runs under 1.3, I can keep my memory available.
#136418From: Karl F. KugelMar 19, 1994 5:27 PM
John, I've heard (from Expert Systems) that the 3.0 ROMs are only 512K, so that it should fit in the standard SROM. We will see.
#136617From: Christian BusseMar 21, 1994 5:45 PM
Karl, I think the _3.0_ ROMs are 512K but there's 2 of the little suckers… <g> // Chris coming in from Germany \X/ on AutoPilot 1.061……….
#136199From: Christian BusseMar 17, 1994 6:02 PM
Steve wrote that his 3.1 ROM only has 512K, so there is still hope… I have a small daughter board with only every other chip soldered in, so is it just the matter of buying some chips and do a bit of soldering?
#136348From: John M. VreelandMar 19, 1994 1:11 AM
sIf the 3.1 ROM is only a half meg then it's the same size as 2.04, yes? I should be all set since I have that much SRAM installed. It's just a jumper switch from 1.3 to 2.0. -Vree in Virginia.
#136380From: Christian BusseMar 19, 1994 10:15 AM
John, yes, OS2.04's ROM size is 512K, too, and happiness is only a jumper switch (and a new ROM) away, IF the 3.1 ROM stays 512K until actual release (Steve, as a registered developer, has the beta release ROMS/WB). // Chris coming in from Germany \X/ on AutoPilot 1.061……….
#136419From: Karl F. KugelMar 19, 1994 5:27 PM
As far as I know, at this time there is no 3.1 ROM, it uses the 3.0 one. So the size shouldn't increase. -Karl Speaking from the Rubble.
#136442From: John M. VreelandMar 19, 1994 10:44 PM
I understood that it would be the 3.0 ROM, I was merely referring to the idea of a 3.1 DOS version for everyone. My only worry now is that the 3.0 ROM won't work in my machine (the 2.05 ROM doesn't). -Vree in Virginia.
#136648From: Karl F. KugelMar 22, 1994 12:53 AM
>My only worry now is that the 3.0 ROM won't work in my machine (the 2.05 >ROM doesn't). Oh really? I guess I better call CSA, the 2.05 shouldn't be any bigger than the 2.04. -Karl Speaking from the Rubble.
#137115From: John M. VreelandMar 26, 1994 1:24 PM
The problem with 2.05 isn't the MMR it's just that it doesn't work with 500's. I've heard it works so-so with late revision 6 motherboards. -Vree in Virginia