CompuServe Thread

#Homemade film transfer?

6 messages in this thread
#3778From: Joel K. HollimanMar 16, 1995 10:37 AM
I've got some old 8mm film I would like to transfer. Any suggestions on the best homemade setup to do this. Thanks in advance
#3808From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPMar 17, 1995 9:14 PM
Joel, Here is the expert opinion of the day (big grin) (although I would like to know its shortcomings from someone who does know what they are talking about …) Point the 8mm projector at a wall, and put your camcorder directly to the left or right of it. Creative framing et al., record. -John
#3816From: A J. SOLOMONMar 17, 1995 11:44 PM
John ,you hit the nail on the head. At this very moment the old Bell & Howell is sitting on the desk with the 450 on a tripodnext to it. I use a semi-glossy poster board on the wall. I have found that by keeping the projected image small (8-10 inches wide) the contrast is reduced. Also because of the high light output of the projector I reduce the manual iris a bit. I found that by setting the white balance to the outdoor setting I get more of a natural color rendition ( don't ask me why, I don't know <g>). And don't forget to clean the 40 years of dust from the film. I use Edwal anti stat film cleaner, I think it's still made (not like the 8mm splices i tried to buy recently, I got a chuckle from the guy in the camera store). It's a tedious job, but with most of the specks removed, some of this stuff actually looks good. The only fallback with this setup is that you have to be an octopus to reach all the controls…….. arnie
#3857From: Timothy LiebeMar 19, 1995 10:29 AM
John, Arnie: >Point the 8mm projector at a wall, and put your camcorder directly to the left or right of it. Creative framing et al., record.< I seem to recollect another method back in the days of Super-8 filmmaking that also might work for film-tape transfers: you project the film image into a magnifying glass and videotape the magnifying glass image. Supposedly, it worked better than shooting off a wall (tho I've had pretty good results w/that, too). Hope this helps, Tim Liebe
#3902From: A J. SOLOMONMar 20, 1995 4:56 PM
Tim > you project the film image into a magnifying glass and videotape the magnifying glass image< sounds like a interesting concept, I have been trying to align this setup for about an hour now with no results. Could you elaborate on this a bit, i.e. distance between projector and camera. Also I am a little concerned about projecting a magnified image directly into the lens, or does the magnifier work as a condensor lens? arnie
#3910From: Timothy LiebeMar 21, 1995 9:37 AM
Arnie: >> you project the film image into a magnifying glass and videotape the magnifying glass image<< >sounds like a interesting concept, I have been trying to align this setup for about an hour now with no results. Could you elaborate on this a bit, i.e. distance between projector and camera.< Oh, Jeez! It's been about fifteen years since I last tried it (back when I was living at home & going to college)–but it seems to me that the distance between projector and magnifying glass wasn't more than a foot or two (enough to get the full projected image comfortably onto the glass w/out slopover), and the distance from glass to camera wasn't more than three feet, fully zoomed in. (Of course, I've since lost the magazine the article was in, so I can't check the number for sure…) >Also I am a little concerned about projecting a magnified image directly into the lens, or does the magnifier work as a condensor lens?< Actually, it works more like a REAL accurate screen, w/no texture to accidentally get incorporated into the image. The time I tried it, the results were very good, but the setup was so complicated (my magnifying glass kept slipping, I had a hell of a time aligning the elements, and my Mom needed the kitchen table <g>) that I set it aside for a future date. Sorry I can't be of more help, Tim