CompuServe Thread

#How to count slots

9 messages in this thread
#99850From: Christopher R. HertelApr 25, 1990 9:58 AM
Ron, Just a couple of things… I think that you may be able to find (if you really want one) an expansion chassis that will accomodate extra PC boards. I've heard of such things. Put one card in a Amiga PC slot and connect it via a cable to a board in the expansion system. Of course, I've never seen such beasts… The other thing… The 68040 is not yet production ready. They are still working out the bugs. I have that on good authority from a couple of sources. Chris -)—–
#99893From: paul ciminoApr 25, 1990 4:55 PM
The expansion chassis for IBM PC's are available, but not cheap. For the price of an IBM expansion chassis (PC or AT) you could probably get a PC Turbo XT mail order with 640K , CGA and a floppy drive. Add to that the price of a bridgeboard, and you might as well get an AT with harddrive. That's what I did :-} (I still use my Amiga more, but require the compatibility for work)
#100101From: Paul Christian NelisApr 26, 1990 10:02 AM
Your desk must be bigger than mine. I need the bridgeboard 'cause I can't fit another machine on my desk! {=-} Paul
#100148From: paul ciminoApr 26, 1990 6:30 PM
Try buying an adjustible floor stand for each one, and turn them into two towers. The only problem is getting the 9 pin extension cords for the Amiga mouse and joystick ports, and of course the keyboard (I forget where I got mine, but they are available) then you have two monitors and two keyboards on your desk. It's an odd setup, but I happen to like it. I did have two desks (That Oscar Meyer press board furniture, or whatever its called) 1 Amiga and 1 AT. That was probably better, and the desks with the hutch run about $90. But a friend needed the desk for something
#99922From: RON TROYApr 25, 1990 7:16 PM
Expansion boxes do exist but its been suggested to me that they are an iffy proposition. And if they couldn't use the 040, they could have gone for a 25mhz 030 as the bottom of the line, and have 33 and even 50 above that. Ron
#100114From: Christopher R. HertelApr 26, 1990 11:40 AM
I got a reply on the expansion box idea. Apparently they are not cheap. As for the clock speed on the 040… I think that it gives C= some room to grow. Still, I know how greedy I am for speed. I'd like to see the Amiga blow past the Mac so fast that it makes their floppies wobble. Chris -)—–
#100163From: Gabe J. FederApr 26, 1990 8:29 PM
Ron, seems to me you're just Commodore Bashing… Really, you want that stuff, some of it is available to soup up your 2000 at 33 Mhz and above… Go for it. –Gabe
#100212From: RON TROYApr 26, 1990 10:41 PM
Just not for the 3000; it seems silly that a 2000 could be faster then the 3000. Ron
#100274From: Brian BartlettApr 27, 1990 2:36 AM
Ron, I don't happen to feel that it is too silly since it is always easier to re-engineer an accelerator board than to re-engineer a whole machine. I wonder what the lead time differences are? True, I would love for C= to have come out with a Mac IIfx killer off the bat, but, at the price, I don't really care. I wonder how fast a tower design would/could be? Brian J. Bartlett