CompuServe Thread

#3000 Video outputs

15 messages in this thread
#99984From: Karl SparklinApr 25, 1990 9:41 PM
Larry, Hope you've had some time to spend groping the 3000. There is a question that burns at my soul… If the 3000 has both 15kHz and 31kHz outputs, why do you need a multisync monitor? I had assumed (probably incorrectly) that normal computer-monitor use would be with the display hooked up to the 31kHz output, and that all modes would appear deinterlaced at that frequency (except the highest). The 15kHz output would be used only with genlocks, etc. Perhaps the only 31kHz rates are the deinterlaced modes plus the productivity mode, and that the ones that didn't interlace in the first place still exit the 31kHz port at 15kHz, requiring a multisync? How does the 1950 look? Thanks, Karl
#100015From: R. NiklosApr 25, 1990 10:41 PM
The A3000 works with a RGB analog, VGA or multiscanning monitors (yes VGA!) (not all modes supported with VGA or RGB analog monitors). R, Niklos The displays on this puppy are gonna look real nice and crisp.
#100172From: Karl SparklinApr 26, 1990 8:45 PM
Yah, I see where the tube is a .31mm dot-pitch. That's reasonably good for that size monitor and will contribute to some crisp imagery, as you say. (.25mm is available, but the cost goes up and the brightness output goes down.) I really worry about them using the term VGA so heavily. I'd rather they used "VGA-rate" or somesuch. Calling it VGA outright implies that the stock Amiga somehow runs VGA applications, or has the exact VGA screen format, shows existing VGA pics, etc. The only thing it has in common with VGA is the horizontal rate. Oh well. A video-tech's beef. I'm anxious to see one of these puppies. I hope they stick with a quality monitor on the 3000. Some of the models of displays sold for the other machines suck big-time. Karl
#100231From: RON TROYApr 26, 1990 10:56 PM
Its my understanding that the 1950 is a VGA compatible multisynch, but I'm not at all sure; anyone know for sure? Ron
#100268From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 27, 1990 2:13 AM
Ron, It's specs are: .31 dot pitch 50 to 80 Hz vertical sync 15 to 36 kHz horizontal sync (I think 36… > 32 anyway) So yes, it should work on an MS-DOS machine with a VGA adapter. Don
#100283From: RON TROYApr 27, 1990 6:15 AM
Nice part is that the video I saw even looked good on a 1084! Ron
#100242From: Betty Clay/SYSOPApr 26, 1990 11:24 PM
An English friend told me about the monitor being displayed with the 3000 in the English show. He said it looked 'old fashioned' to him, but that the display was crisp. He said that someone from Commodore UK told him it was a 'Ranger' monitor with a few changes. Know anything about that? He considered it old fashioned because he said the corners were all rounded, and he thought of that as being popular about five or six years ago, but not now. Just one man's opinion, of course. ……Betty
#100901From: Roscoe ThomasApr 29, 1990 7:34 PM
The VGA monitor can handle 31.5KHz and 60 or 70Hz vertical rates while the standard super VGA 512K card can handle 256 of 256K colors in 640×480 or 640×400. The monitors are cheap, and a VGA or PS/2 monitor ought to be able to handle everything but overscan Amiga modes.
#100031From: Kevin DarlingApr 25, 1990 11:08 PM
Karl – a 31Khz output would fry most normal monitors, quite literally. You'd need a multisync for the de-interlaced modes. – kev
#100173From: Karl SparklinApr 26, 1990 8:45 PM
Kevin, True, but I had heard (or thought I understood) that the flicker-fixed output was going to be 31kHz ONLY, that the lower modes would be converted to that frequency. Thus, I wondered why you'd need anything other than a 31kHz display. Now I understand. Karl
#100252From: Kevin DarlingApr 27, 1990 12:48 AM
Karl – umm, right <grin>! The Flickerfix'd <tm> output would have to go to a 31Khz display. Non-fixed displays can go to a normal (or multisync) monitor.
#100081From: John DraperApr 26, 1990 2:41 AM
Karl, You need a multisync to take advantage of all modes, including the ones you want shown interlaced for a reason (like when using X-Specs). I don't have a 1950. I will be using a Samsung multisync. -larry
#100175From: Karl SparklinApr 26, 1990 8:45 PM
Larry, So what's the highest graphics mode look like? Is it 1280 x 400? I'm anxious to see it; our dealer hasn't received his yet. Is there a switch to disable the scan-doubler? Karl
#100232From: RON TROYApr 26, 1990 10:56 PM
That 1280×400 looked great to me on a 1084! And there is a switch to disable the doubler for the 31mhz output. Ron
#100313From: Peter SmithemApr 27, 1990 10:27 AM
Ron, 31 MHZ output!!! Great, gimme one. I want a 1,280,000×400,000 display!!! <grin>! Peter_S (LeCroy Corp) "Software means never having to say you're finished"