CompuServe Thread

#DAT?

8 messages in this thread
#54037From: Bill DwyerMar 31, 1992 12:42 PM
We're a multiplatform household. I've got a 2000, a peecee clone and several Macs. I just bought a DAT (Archive Python). Performance on my Mac is really terrific (258M copied and verified in less than an hour, 7M incremental in less than 3 minutes) so now I'd like to use it on the peecee and the Amiga. The peecee is easy since there's lots of backup software that recognizes it. I just need to add a SCSI board. On the 2000, I've got a SCSI board (GVP Series II) but it's manual doesn't say anyhting about tape. My QuarterBack manual says it recognizes streaming tapes but I don't think they mean DAT. Is anyone using a DAT on the Amiga? If so, can you give me a clue as to how you set it upo and what software you're using? Thanks
#54049From: Alan RussellMar 31, 1992 7:41 PM
Hmm.. I guess you need to know things like the block size, command set and so forth.. I managed to make a SCSI QIC drive work..
#54086From: John DraperApr 1, 1992 1:52 AM
I am currently using a DAT drive (Archive Python), with performance ranging from about 3.5 to 10.5 megs/minute, depending on what I am writing to it. I developed my own software though, since the one method I tried (tar, and Markus Wandel's tape-handler) did not work. There are several other tape handlers out though, and one of them might work. Metadigm owns the rights to my programs, and they can be contacted via Vic Wagner, 76046,3004, here on Compuserve. I don't know what the current status of the software is. -larry
#54107From: Bill DwyerApr 1, 1992 11:03 AM
Thanks – that sounds just like what I'm looking for. I'll drop him a note Bill
#54102From: daniel wolfApr 1, 1992 6:06 AM
Try it with AmiBack.
#54108From: Bill DwyerApr 1, 1992 11:03 AM
Thanks, I'll take a look Bill
#54234From: daniel wolfApr 3, 1992 5:01 AM
looks like someone (only 1) has downloaded them already. looks like I should have put them in the 24-bit IFF art library, but, … hope you like them.
#54243From: Bill DwyerApr 3, 1992 11:04 AM
I think you're on the wrong thread!