CompuServe Thread

Imagine 2.0 Blues

16 messages in this thread
#33539From: Bill GoelkelJan 13, 1992 7:21 PM
Pete, Mind if I stray from the subject a bit to ask a couple of techie questions about the project you described? Your applications sound somewhat similar to mine and I'm wondering if you're always outputting to Firecracker and, if so, how you get from there to NTSC or R-Y / B-Y (or whatever). I've been going from Amiga RGB to component and am looking for something better.
#33550From: John PendergrassJan 13, 1992 9:14 PM
Bill, there are several ways to go FireCracker24 to video. I use the DigiFex video encoder, which allows me to record in either regular video, or S-VHS. Cost @ $100 or so. Results are good. Caveat: I've seen messages that some DigiFex encoders will cause a color shift on the FireCracker signal…. so you may want to try a specific unit on your machine before you buy. Any external genlock should also work. At least I've heard of others doing it just fine. Hmmmm….. Ben at Black Belt has been promoting another 24bit board lately…. I wonder if it would take the FireCracker 24bit board as a video source for genlocking? –jp–seattle–
#33973From: Bill GoelkelJan 18, 1992 11:14 PM
Have genlock, but obviously don't know anything about Firecracker, such as that it'll work with an external genlock. Thanks for the info.
#33561From: Pete GouldJan 13, 1992 10:27 PM
Bill, It's not exactly standard. Fasten your seatbelt. My Amiga has a SuperGen 2000S, and when I got it I retired my old Supergen external unit to a closet. When I got the Firecracker I found that the overlay section won't work with an internal genlock, though the board will otherwise function. What to do. Then I found that the Firecracker runs completely independently of the Amiga as far as timing is concerned; it's possible to genlock the Amiga to one thing, and the Firecracker to something else. So — the Amiga is genlocked to our house sync via the SuperGen 2000S. The Firecracker is hooked up to the old SuperGen which is also genlocked to house sync. Only problem there is that you can't adjust the timing on the old external SuperGen, so I run house sync out to another sync generator that has timing controls, and run the blackburst out of that second sync generator to the SuperGen. That way I can time the Firecracker in to the system. So far, that means the Amiga can appear to my switcher as two separate sources — the Firecracker and the Amiga graphics. So I can make a background on the Firecracker, say, and put graphics over it from something like Broadcast Titler II. But that's all composite. The RGB loop output from the SuperGen runs to a Panasonic UTP-2 transcoder, so if I'm running straight to tape — like for single-framing animations — I can transcode to YRB. Whew! That's how it works. Pete
#33972From: Bill GoelkelJan 18, 1992 11:14 PM
Bet that took only 2 or 3 minutes to work out.<g> Sounds pretty clever, and flexible. I use a post production house; no video equipment (or engineering expertise) here. I do have an Omni-Gen external genlock and a few S-VHS VCRs for client approvals and off-line editing — mostly live action that originates on film or B'Cam with an occasional graphic here and there. Once graphics are approved, I bring in a BVW-70 for a day and dump them. I take it the Firecracker has RGB output which the Omni-Gen could encode/ transcode/whatever to component video just like it does normal Amiga RGB, so my only problem then would be dealing with single frame because with the Firecracker the system's moving too much data to record animation in real time, right?
#33988From: John PendergrassJan 19, 1992 1:50 AM
Unfortunately you cannot animate the FireCracker24's display in real time. It is a single frame display device, and takes a second or two to load an image into it. But at either 384×482 or 512×482 resolution it does offer two independent buffers. You can display one while loading your next image into the other buffer, and do page flipping for backgrounds that way. Don't forget that it does allow the amiga screen to overlay the 24bit buffer either. I know I mention this often, but regular amiga anims (ie. HAM, 32color, etc) look pretty darn sharp when they are displayed over the top of a full color background. Combine that with the ability to preload the next 24bit background and page flip, and you have a pretty sophisticated system. Easier to design the anim too, since it allows (forces) you to seperate the background from the foreground imagery. I'll shut up now 🙂 –jp–seattle–
#34023From: Bill GoelkelJan 19, 1992 4:07 PM
Pete mentioned timing on FC24 was separate from Amiga overlay. Am I correct in assuming you can do what you describe (overlaying Amiga anim on FC24 background) thru a single external encoder and they will stay in synch?
#34025From: John PendergrassJan 19, 1992 5:08 PM
Yeah, you're correct. The encoder is attached to the output of the FireCracker24. That output includes the 24bit buffer and the amiga overlay. It's *no* different than just running the encoder off the regular amiga RGB signal. OTOH, there have been a few reports that the DigiFex encoder can cause a color shift in the output. It looks fine when viewed as RGB on the monitor, but not-so-good after the encoder gets through with it. My encoder doesn't seem to have this problem, but you should be aware of it anyway. Karl S. had this problem, and sent his encoder to Impulse to have it modified to work better with the FR24. I don't know how it turned out. Maybe he can say, if he is reading. Karl? Finally, just remember that with a $100 video encoder you get what you pay for. This is not the hottest video signal in the world 🙁 I've *heard* that if you run it through a really good genlock, and view on a good NTSC monitor, that it looks much better. But it looks good enough for my purposes. –jp–seattle–
#34032From: Mike SchillerJan 19, 1992 7:11 PM
John: I also sent my Digifex encoder to Impulse, and it does now work better than it did before, but still has a horrible color shift, there's almost no blue in the picture at all (on the RGB, Composite, and S-Video outputs) I've since decided that the Digifex isn't for me, and so I ordered a 23pin switchbox from Redmond, and I'll use my A520 to encode the FC (the A520 seems to do a MUCH better job than the digifex, although it has no S-Video output). -Mike Schiller In sunny Fort Lauderdale
#34101From: John PendergrassJan 20, 1992 9:45 PM
Whoops, I got the wrong name Mike (not 'Karl'). Sorry! 🙂 –jp–seattle–
#34062From: Bill GoelkelJan 20, 1992 11:20 AM
I'm using an Omni-Gen, which is a pretty good unit. The problem with low-end encoders is not so much how they look on a monitor, but how the signal holds up on tape, particularly as you go down multiple generations. Monitors, except for the 6-thousand dollar ones, are more tolerant of marginal signals. All this of course is relative: nobody'd ever mistake NTSC for RGB, even if the encoding were perfect. Thanks for the advice; it's really helpful.
#34075From: R. BARRY BALDERSTONJan 20, 1992 4:30 PM
Hi! I appreciated the advice also! Take Care! BARRY – via Whap! "Pro's from the Desert" Sierra Vista, AZ
#34446From: Karl SparklinJan 26, 1992 4:32 PM
John, I just read your message about me sending an encoder to Impulse. T'ain't true. Don't own one. Ya must have me confused with someone, maybe Mr. Shiller? I'm poor, ya know. Karl – via Whap!
#34471From: John PendergrassJan 26, 1992 9:20 PM
Whoops, sorry. I get all you Imaginoids confused 🙂 –jp–seattle–
#34486From: Mike SchillerJan 26, 1992 11:14 PM
John: Now you're really getting confused, I don't use Imagine at all (don't even own a 3d program at all). 🙂 -Mike Schiller In sunny Fort Lauderdale
#34559From: John PendergrassJan 27, 1992 10:42 PM
Hey, we're in the Imagine section; that's all I meant. See you Joe. 🙂 –jp–seattle–