CompuServe Thread

Cloud Effects

18 messages in this thread
#33544From: randy auschratJan 13, 1992 8:37 PM
That would be a virtual endless supply of Pic maps. I'm thinking about buying a DCTV so I can digitize some stuff for brush mapping. Then all I would need is a camera. This hobby is getting way to expensive…
#33648From: Peter GreciJan 15, 1992 1:40 AM
May I make a suggestion here.If yer gonna use a Camera to Digitize with DCTV to create Texture Maps take a GOOD look at the Canon Xapshot.I have one and have used a friends DCTV with it and it makes EXCELLENT digi pics
#33724From: John PendergrassJan 15, 1992 9:26 PM
Peter, re your use of the XapShot camera…. I've come 'this close' to getting one, but haven't yet…. cause I cannot find anyone who can SHOW me a picture taken with it displayed on the Amiga. Would it be possible for you to upload a basic image (ie. landcape, portrait, etc) that you've digitized, so that I could see the general quality of the images? You use DCTV to digitize, right? I was planning on using DigiView with it, assuming I get it. Do you know of any differences in digitizing quality (re the ZapShot) between the two? Thanks in advance…. if you can't upload something I understand; I'm just very curious about it. BTW, did you have to purchase the 'sports' package to get the tripod connector? Someone else told me that the basic camera doesn't even have a tripod screw… that you have to purchase the extra package in order to use a tripod? True? –jp–seattle–
#33771From: Margaret CopelandJan 16, 1992 11:43 AM
I have a Mavica and I grilled the Canon salespeeps at MacExpo. I had them show me on a Mac what the Zapshot image looked like. For all I can tell its the same quality as the Mavice. The cheapest Zapshot I've seen is about $360.00 mailorder, I got my Mavice for $200.00 from WholeEarth. Now the Zapshot has two features the Mavica doesn't, it has a Macro so you can get about 15" from the image, the Mavica is 3 ft. The other feature is that you can tell the Zapshot not to flash, can't do that with the Mavica. Autoflash in hopeless lighting situations – like inside on a white background does not help. You might do better if you could turn off the flash and do the lighting with video lights. You can always put a piece of tape over the Mavica flash. Canon has a new $2000.00 camera, it gives you a frame instead of a field picture, so there is no horizontal stepping on a full screen picture. It has a faster lens, a 2.0 (whatever that would mean for a digital camera). I use the DCTV filter in Black Belt's IP to remove the horizontal stepping and it does a wonderful job! If you use the Zapshot or Mavica pictures quarter screen on a 640X400(480) screen, they look just fine. Not good for closeup stuff, Digiview and a still video camera look better.
#33805From: John PendergrassJan 16, 1992 10:00 PM
The Mavica sounds great. What I want is 1/4 to 1/3 screen images anyway, not full screen (for windows in interactive stuff). Could you build a little switch to enable/disable the flash on it? In any case it sounds like I could deal with the flash somehow. I don't think the macro lens is that important to me either; I'll have to consider that. Does the Mavica have a build-in tripod screw? So that I can hook it up to any camera/video tripod? I understand that is an 'extra cost' item with the XapShot, but I'm still checking it. You use DigiView and IP… good, that's how I was planning on going too. BTW, are you using WB2.0? If so, how are you getting the DigiView buffer command to work? Mine is broke (boo) right now. Ben says I need the new 2.0 compatible DigiView, which is on the way. Hope it works then. I really miss the DigiView buffer command. TTFN –jp–seattle–
#33843From: Margaret CopelandJan 17, 1992 10:07 AM
No, the Mavica does not have a tripod screw but you could probably work something out. I wouldn't bother with a flash switch, I'd just get a piece of draftsman's tape and cover the flash – low tech solution. I use the Digiview and the Color Splitter with the auto cable. I'm not doing 2.0 with my 500 'till I get the accelerator in there and all is quiet. Remember that the Mavica and the Xap Shot are really point and shoot cameras. The quality is low but if you bring the image in at 640X400+ (which exceeds the range of the camera really), and scale it to 1/4 screen, it looks fine. IP does what it can with the stepping. In some respects this softens the image. Some shots just don't need it, especially if you don't have a lot of 45 degree angles in the picture.
#33866From: John PendergrassJan 17, 1992 7:34 PM
Thanks…. I'll check out the Mavica in some mail order places. I know that if I walked into any local camera store and asked about either the ZapShot or the Mavica I'd get a blank stare. I have no idea of how to order from Whole Earth; didn't even know they had a 'store' or 'catalog' 🙂 –jp–seattle–
#33937From: Margaret CopelandJan 18, 1992 4:23 PM
You could try directory service to Berkeley, ask for Whole Earth Store Electronics and Computers, they'll route you. I believe, pretty sure they do mail order. There are two Mavicas, one that is $100.00 more with a 15 sec sound bite capability. Get the cheaper one. Comes with one battery and a disk. Disks are cheaper NY Mail order (get Shutterbug at the newstand). If the have extra batteries, you might want one, but they are expensive $40.00. Not sure if yee old Vidiot supply has that battery size or the camera but they might.
#34012From: Peter GreciJan 19, 1992 2:03 PM
The package I have Has the Tripod Screw Wether it was the "sports" Package or not I have NO idea.As to me ULing a Digitized pic done with Xapshot at the moment I have No Digitizer for the Amiga,I had done my Testing at a Friends Studio.BTW For some Reason the Toaster Had Trouble Digitizing from the Xapshot.I dunno why since I don't own a Toaster I used my Buddies Equipment.I keep holding off buying new equipment like even the DCTV cuz my ol lady is unemployed and we're living off my Check's
#34017From: Margaret CopelandJan 19, 1992 3:01 PM
My Mavica couldn't digitize to the Toaster, needs a TBC?
#34063From: Peter GreciJan 20, 1992 12:43 PM
That may very well ber the problem,we didn't go thru his TBC either
#34078From: Margaret CopelandJan 20, 1992 5:42 PM
I just tried it once in a casual way as I just had the camera and the player. Could not get it to do more than mess up the screen. After I digitized the pics and made them 24bit, they toasted just fine.
#34024From: John PendergrassJan 19, 1992 5:07 PM
Thanks for the reply. Margaret Copeland has been very nice to give me advice on the Mavica too, so I think I have enough info to work with now. –jp–seattle–
#34031From: Mike SchillerJan 19, 1992 7:11 PM
John: I can send you some shots done on the Xapshot. Would jpeg images be OK? (shorter upload/download times) If not, I can send a 24bit image. These were digitized using an Impulse VD-1 digitizer, and also the output of the Xapshot was run thru a TBC. -Mike Schiller In sunny Fort Lauderdale
#34100From: John PendergrassJan 20, 1992 9:45 PM
Mike, that would be great. It sounds like yours would be 'better' than any I would get, cause I'd use DigiView and no TBC, but it would show me what the darn thing is capable of. I have a pretty good idea from descriptions of Margaret (Mavica) and Peter G (Xapshot), but 'seeing is believing' 🙂 JPEG is fine. Just a good sample image. Thanks. Do you find your VD-1 and the TBC add 'significantly' to the quality of your digitizing with the XapShot? –jp–seattle–
#34116From: Mike SchillerJan 21, 1992 3:11 AM
John: When you say 'add significantly', I'd have to say yes, as without them (and Impulse's VDZ program) I wouldn't be able to digitize at all, would you consider that significant? I'll try and upload a couple of pix in the next couple of days, but can't give any promises, as I've been having trouble uploading to CIS lately. -Mike Schiller In sunny Fort Lauderdale
#34150From: John PendergrassJan 21, 1992 7:48 PM
Mike, forget about loading the pics, I think. Given the generally positive comments I see from others I think I have enough info to make a decision with. I may be back to you with some questions on it later, though! –jp–seattle–
#33894From: randy auschratJan 17, 1992 10:45 PM
I may have to look into that later on. After buying my new machine and the DCTV, I'm just a little broke. Anyways, thanks for the info. Later. Randy.