CompuServe Thread

#Toaster Dealer

40 messages in this thread
#53105From: Sam SternMar 22, 1993 7:53 AM
My name is Sam Stern, and I'm new at this forum. I represent B&H Photo/Video in NYC. We are a mail order and retail photo and video discount house. We sell industrial video equipment including the Video Toaster and peripherals for the Toaster. We have technicians and editors who use the Toaster and are very knowledgable about this product. Although I cannot quote prices on the Forum, you can get prices from me through E-mail or by calling 800-932-1977 EXT.406, or ask for Sam (that's me). We DO have the lowest prices (we've done extensive research on this) and full stock of Toaster equipment as well as industrial video equipment. I hope I can be of help yo anyone needing Toaster equipment. Sam.
#53126From: Peter GreciMar 22, 1993 8:33 PM
Sam, First Howdy from a fellow NYer. Now to the Meat. Do you guys carry the Toaster Oven Hardware for transplanting the innards of a A3000 into this Toaster Oven for using the Toaster? I was in Digital Dimensions today and while I've been told by their managament that they are phasing out Genereal Amiga stuff they are now concentrating on the Toaster and other Video related equipment and yet they had no idea what I was talking about when I mentioned the Toaster Oven. They immediately said No you mean the Toaster Cozzy. Does not promote confidence. You guys DO have Great prices and the ability to Bankrupt me easily hehehehehehehe Midgard Graphics. 718 714 1423
#53150From: Sam SternMar 23, 1993 7:43 AM
Sorry, we don't carry Toaster Oven hardware. Sam.
#53211From: Peter GreciMar 23, 1993 11:56 PM
Bugger, I wonder if ANYBODY carries the Toaster Oven? Perhaps the maker is having manufacturing or distribution problems. Oh Well, I would rather NOT have a Second case but perhaps I'm better off getting a Toaster Cozzy instead.
#53217From: John GrossMar 24, 1993 2:07 AM
Peter, Why not just put your Toaster in your 3000. That's what I did and it works great. JG
#53247From: Peter GreciMar 24, 1993 4:09 PM
John, did you have to replace your Power Supply in yer 3000??? I already have a second HD in the 3000 and plan to add a 040 and "I" think adding the Toaster will Overtax the Stock Power Supply. Also what do I have to snip on the back of my 3000 to fit the Toaster in so that Input 1 is not covered up? is it just the Silvery Sheet Metal in the back of the case? Thanx, I appreciate the help. "A Toaster Coveter who only wants Lightwave 3D tho I'd like to PLAY with the Switcher"
#53278From: Erik FlomMar 24, 1993 10:19 PM
I put a Toaster in my A3000 (cutting out a 3/4" sq. hole in the vented area at the rear-left-top of the back panel – very easy). I didn't have any problems until I put in a GVP 040 (w/ 2MB of high-speed RAM & LOTS of extra GLU chips onboard to really suck the power). The next morning, my system would not power up if the Toaster was installed. NewTek replaced the Toaster, I replaced the Power Supply, and everything was well after that. (Well, sort of, the GVP board STILL had thermal problems, and after sending it into GVP twice in the first month, they swapped it out for a different board that has blazed along in my A3000 for the last month w/o any problems. [An 040 is *really* nice too!]) Keep On Toastin' (or at least, give it a try), Erik Flom P.S. NAB is only 2 weeks away, so you might want to hold out 'til then. I'm bracing myself for the painful cost of the next upgrade to LW. :^)
#53324From: Peter GreciMar 25, 1993 5:18 PM
Hmmmmmm, I was considering getting my Toaster after WOC here in NY or possibly AT WOC. maybe I'll wait a wee bit then.
#53296From: John GrossMar 24, 1993 11:49 PM
If you go to an 040 and another drive, you most likely will need another power supply. Right now I only have a stock 3000 as one of my machines and I have the Toaster, a 120 meg drive and original power supply and everything is great. As a matter of fact I'm rendering a wireframe preview right now. I didn't cut anything on the back of my 3000. I have the Toaster installed and input one is pushing against the back of the case bending it out slightly (with the cover on, you can't tell). I have one of those metal brackets that cover the unused slots with two bnc's installed on it (for input one and two). These two bnc's are soldered to solder points on the side of the card where these inputs are located (this way the board isn't modified greatly). Everything works great unless you have a lot of weight on top of the machine's cover because that can ground out some solder points on the board — it's really close to the cover. I had that prob but covered the Toaster with an anti-static piece cut from one of those bags that accelerators, etc. come in. Of course, you could install the card and take a look to see where the case needs to be snipped to allow access to all bnc's. JGross
#53325From: Peter GreciMar 25, 1993 5:18 PM
Thanx to you and Erik, I'm confident that adding the Toaster will not be too bad of a Trauma. Will relocate my DCTV BACK to my Decked out A500/Bodega Bay beastie and possibly Parnet the 2 together.
#53451From: Anthony RamirezMar 27, 1993 5:29 PM
Well I have posted my problem with a A3000/Toaster combo which was a weak Power Supply, with the Toaster installed nothing would happen on power-up. My system is a A3000-25mhz/18megs of ram/2 HDs and the Toaster. I also have DCTV hooked up with no problems, but I have heard that some old DCTV units might have problems with a Toaster. <<< Tony D. Tracer >>>
#53509From: Peter GreciMar 28, 1993 10:25 AM
Thanx Tony. I appreciate it. Guess I'll get my dealer to put a Bigger PS in before I get Toasted.
#53622From: Anthony RamirezMar 29, 1993 11:23 PM
They don't `sell' any high-output PS for the A3000. The only way to get more output is to get it `upgraded' by Micro R&D. You might want to try it first to see if it works with the standard PS, the local dealers have installed many Toaster in A3000s without problems. <<< Tony D. Tracer >>>
#53195From: David J. HillyerMar 23, 1993 9:24 PM
Sam, I'm very interested in Video Toaster. I'm the advertising mgr. at Wabash National Corp (we make truck trailers) and we'd like to get into video production. I've got my own design business on the side that I'm thinking about expanding. My purchase hinges on one big thing: I use IBM compatible computers and I need to import some bitmaps or wireframes from CorelDraw into Toaster. My plan for my business is to make some videotapes with soccer bloopers from game tapes. Toaster would kill everything I've seen so far. But everything hinges on the PC factor (well, also the cost factor). I don't know the least thing about Amigas or why Toaster is based on the Amiga instead of a more mainstream computer. What I need to do is have 3 VCR's hooked into VT and I'd need to be able to do character generation if it won't import from CorelDraw. I've heard VT2.0 isn't very good with characters, so I'll probably wait to see what 3.0 brings, but I'd like to get an idea of what I'm getting into (at least hardware and pricewise). -Dave
#53203From: Patrick WhiteMar 23, 1993 10:54 PM
Pardon for the interruption…. David I couldn't help notice your comment on the Amiga. "I don't know the least thing about Amigas or why Toaster is based on the Amiga instead of a more mainstream computer…" You would have been amazed if you had looked at Amigas before IBM. Originally, the Amiga 1000 came out with an operating system, built in, which truely multi-tasked (with a "windows" like environment.) The deal is the Amiga came first, 1986 if I recall correctly. So if you were an earlier Amiga owner, you would not have been impressed at all with Windows. Since the Amiga multitasks, it is the ideal format with which to build the Revolution in Desk Top Video. The Toaster only works with an Amiga. And Amigas are much easier to operate than an IBM. NDAI Good luck with your Toaster. You be glad you purchased it… Patrick White "Saving my bread for a toaster."
#53233From: David J. HillyerMar 24, 1993 11:41 AM
Well, my biggest issue right now is… will the Amiga run my Windows stuff and most importantly my X-Wing game (with soundblaster?). I've heard it can run Windows and in higher resolution than an IBM, but I'm a little nervous about getting one and soon after wanting to shoot myself for doing so. IBM's will be able to do true multi-task within a year with local bus video too. It would seem that the Amiga's days may be numbered. What's your opinion on this? -Dave
#53251From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPMar 24, 1993 5:16 PM
The Amiga won't run Windows software without a Bridgeboard, and I'm not even sure how well that will work. People have been predicting the demise of the Amiga for years and years now. I don't think the Amiga's days are numbered at all. There are some mighty interesting things coming down the pike. Steve
#53293From: Patrick WhiteMar 24, 1993 11:40 PM
But there is presently nothing like the Video Toaster, especially for $2500, available for the IBMs. The question should not be which machine is better. This is a never-ending discussion much like politics. IBM offer more business software, bar none. IBM machines are getting into video and multimedia but in an expensive way. Again nothing around will match the features of the Video Toaster available only for the Amiga. David, keep your IBM to run Windows. As I stated before, the Amiga does not need Windows to run its own software. It may be less expensive to get a clone to run your IBM software and leave the Amiga for the Toaster, although you can run both at the same time. Rendering would slow your cpu down a bit while heavy multi-tasking. If you haven't already, call 1-800-765-3406 to obtain a free copy of the Video Toaster Video. CG, a 3D program called LightWave, Toaster Paint a 24 bit paint program, many DVEs and a 4 input production studio are just some of the Toaster's features. You will still need to purchase, if you don't have already, TBCs and likely some quality VCRs. Check out the video, if you haven't already. You'll be glad you did. BTW, IBMs and Macs are also fine machines. But I challenge any side-by-side multitasking between IBMs and Amigas (with similar MIPs). Patrick White "Saving my bread for a toaster."
#53617From: Matthew J. W. RatcliffMar 29, 1993 8:39 PM
We can't see what happens with your challenge 'til an IBM or MAc actually can multitask (without running UNIX). When PCs do get around to it, you'll need all new software anyway.
#53621From: John GrossMar 29, 1993 10:53 PM
Also, by the the time that multitasking on a PC actually works, we'll all be on to something else….or dead. JG
#53704From: Rodney MassmanMar 31, 1993 12:59 AM
Curious to find out, as I'm almost ready to start some LightWave anims, which Single Frame Recorder is best for the application. I'm currently of economic means, so I'm sure there's alot of Expensive equipment out there that'd be just great, but what is really affordable to get things rolling with Single Frame Recording on the part of a beginning hobbyist using LightWave 3d? -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#53798From: Peter GreciApr 1, 1993 3:46 PM
REALLY Econical eh? You COULD try using the new Russian Krangourska 16mm Camera's that I've read about on the Photo RT of Genie. They run about $300. Mount it on a Tripod and snap a frame of each frame of the anim, Mind Numbing but Good Quality is attainable RELATIVELY inexpensively. If $$$$ is at a premium get a DCTV and play yer Anims back in relative realtime if you have an A1200,A3000 or A4000 coupled with the new View 3.6 I've gotten 60 FPS on my 25 mhz A3000/68030
#53899From: Rodney MassmanApr 3, 1993 10:01 AM
Well, the Russian method wasn't really what I had in mind, but, eh, it sounds like it'd work. I've got an A2000 with GVP's 030 Combo/40Mhz 4mbRAM w/120Mb HD The Video Toaster Fattest Agnus and some extra 2 slow Mb of Ram on an ol' (I think)Xetec MemCard Primary interest is LightWave. I'd thought I had View 3.6 but looked and found that's another I should get. Rend24 – I do have though. Just not sure how many of those frames I can actually get onto the HD without filling it up and over, although I can guess it'd be relatively few, and that's with a clean and empty HD. Nope, pretty much I need some solid advice as to which SF Recorder works the best with my setup and end goal. Seems funny though, all I ever see in all the AmigaWorld ads concerning DTVideo is a JVC Recorder. Hefty looking sucker too! Even in NewTeks Toaster Tape I think there's two JVC's in a scene. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#53929From: Peter GreciApr 3, 1993 11:16 PM
All the Vidiot's I speak to recommend the JVC BR series as well. I heard alot of complaints on Panasonics products on other BBS's. Saw Lightwave 3D 3.0 in action today. INCREDIBLE is all I can say. Lee Stranahan dubbed it the "Wavefront Killer" I tend to agree now that I've seen it. I'm going to have to part with my Prized Les Paul Custom and get a Toaster now For SURE.
#54053From: Wayne ColeApr 5, 1993 11:13 PM
Rodney, A very cost-effective solution to SF recording is the JVC BR-S605. It is configurable with with a serial card (RS232) for computer control and I know at least AmiLink has support available for this deck. Nucleus may support it as well. It sorta the low end of the high end decks and goes about $2300 list, I think. wmc – via Autopilot!
#53838From: John GrossApr 2, 1993 2:46 AM
I would definitely recommend the Personal Single Frame controller from Nucleus Electronics. It is very affordable (approx 425.00) and controls most any deck as long is the deck has serial control and built in time code. JG
#53900From: Rodney MassmanApr 3, 1993 10:01 AM
Yea, I've had that particular controller in mind but it pretty much comes down to second fiddle compared with the purchase of the actual SFRecorder. I'm a little curious though, if I would want to delve into Editing, could the SFR dual as an Editor or end-VCR (spoken as a true novice, I'm sure). -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#53948From: John GrossApr 4, 1993 2:06 AM
The PSFC won't but the same company is developing the Personal Editor (retail about $695.00) This will only be a cuts only editor – no A/B roll. JG
#54017From: Matthew J. W. RatcliffApr 5, 1993 2:11 PM
Consider the SONY 9650, a nice little hi8 SF deck which doesn't even need a controller.. should be around 3K street price.
#54055From: Wayne ColeApr 5, 1993 11:14 PM
Single framing is usually done to the same type of decks used as the edit deck in an editing suite. wmc – via Autopilot!
#53722From: Wayne ColeMar 31, 1993 2:20 PM
Ooops! – Not true! Don't forget O/S-2. It is mutli-tasking, but since MS did the original version, they REALLY messed it up, I believe, on purpose so that theyhad time to get Windows out and grab a major market share before O/S-2 could do anythign useful. That is what caused the "divorce" between IBM and Billy Gates. O/S-2 is actually a multi-taskig scheme that uses demand page swapping a la MVS or other IBM mainframe OS's. The trouble is the segmentation of the Intel addressing design, the paging overhead and all the memory protection stuff puts such a burden on the beasty that you need 4 megs of memory just for the OS to load and another 4 megs to do anythng useful. And one shouldn't expect much performance on it with less than a 30Mhz '386 chip set either. Don't get me wrong – PeeCee's can multitask – it just aint pretty or fun. It will be along time before the PeeCees can do it with the same basic facility (vis-a-vis day to day usefulness) and speed as AmigaDos, however. wmc – via Autopilot!
#53839From: John GrossApr 2, 1993 2:46 AM
And just think…in 1985 a 512k Amiga could multitask no problem… JG
#53892From: Wayne ColeApr 3, 1993 4:14 AM
…and Bill Gates actually said it couldn't be done in less than 2 megs circa 1989… wmc – via Autopilot!
#54020From: Matthew J. W. RatcliffApr 5, 1993 2:13 PM
Can OS/2 multi-task MS-DOS software, or just programs written for OS/2?
#54048From: Mike TopfApr 5, 1993 9:56 PM
OS/2 2.0 will run multiple DOS, Windows, and OS/2 applications. OS/2 1.3 will run OS/2 applications, and a single DOS session. The DOS sessions tend to draw heavily on the CPU.
#54064From: Wayne ColeApr 6, 1993 12:14 AM
OS/2 1.0 (dont know about the present incarnation) used to have this thing called the compatibility box that started DOS as a process under O/S-2 and essentially treated what went on in that process as a virtual machine distinct unto itself. MicroSoft engineers had another name for it that I forget but it was something like the suicide machine cause most DOS apps run in the (in)compatibility box crashed the machine! (Real useful, huh!) wmc – via Autopilot!
#53321From: Ron LegroMar 25, 1993 2:09 PM
You need one of the bridgeboards to run MS-Windows on an Amiga, and you'd want to plug in a VGA card (or one of those Windows accelerator cards) in an Amiga ISA slot as well as a Windows-compatible soundblaster type card in another slot to see and hear your X-Wing game to full effect. The various bridgeboards can run MS-Windows without a video card but then at best only in 16-color or monochrome VGA. Since Windows is a performance hog, you'd have to go for a 386 or 486 bridgeboard plus set aside a big partition on your Amiga hard drive for Windows files, or add a drive dedicated for bridgeboard use. Probably better off just having two computers — a Windows-based PC and an Amiga alongside. Use a monitor switchbox and they can share one screen. Don't count too much on "true" multitasking for IBM compatibles. On the Amiga, true multitasking is economical in terms of RAM use. On a PC, it will require Windows NT, which demands gobs of RAM and hard disk space. Plus, those machines will still be constrained by the 640K DOS limit, which can be gotten by but only with device kludges. NT will not be a cheap upgrade, just as "Multimedia PC" upgrades aren't cheap, compared to Amiga alternatives. You can approach Toaster quality on a PC if you buy a dedicated, EISA-compatible system equipped with the five-slot Matrox Studio. But that comes without software, takes over the machine and costs upwards of $25,000. The Toaster is in a class by itself in terms of price vs. performance, and will stay there for the foreseeable future, as witness "Babylon 5" and Steven Spielberg's recent decision to buy 30 Amiga Toasters for his next TV series. A plain-vanilla Amiga will outperform most Multimedia PCs in terms of audio quality and (in the case of AGA-equipped models) video output, and often in terms of rendering and execution speed. For the vast majority of PCs out there, configured as they are, the only advantage over most (non-AGA) Amigas is that if they have a Super VGA card they can run 256-color high res games, of which there aren't a whole bunch. Most high-end Amiga games run in 32 or 64 colors at lower resolutions than Super VGA, but there are a couple of HAM-based games, one (so far) AGA game, and one 24-bit (16.7 million-color) game if you own Opalvision. Expect to see more in the latter two categories. The computer industry is one big game of leap frog, and in AGA the Amiga just took a big leap forward. The PC industry has a solid base of useful machines and surely will leap again soon, too. But eventually (sooner than Commodore), PC makers will have to abandon backwards software and hardware support for existing MS-DOS platforms if they are to move their offerings ahead. The underlying technology is about a decade more dated than the oldest manufactured Amiga.
#53234From: Sam SternMar 24, 1993 11:49 AM
Since you've already gotten a reply regarding the incompatibility of VT with IBM, I will quote you the prices as per your request: Amiga 2000 with ROM 2.1 7 Mb RAM 120 Mb Hard Drive Toaster board and software 2.0 Keyboard, mouse, and Amiga 1084S color monitor We install the board and software and test the system before shipping The total cost is $3475.00 plus shipping. The accelerated Toaster package includes the above but with a GVP 68030 40 MHZ accelerator, and 9 Mb RAM. Total cost is $4275.00 plus shipping. There are of course upgrades for memory, hard drive, and acceleration. Please let me know what else you need prices on. We have an extensive line of VCR's, Edit controller's, TBC's, and other related peripheral's for editing systems using the Toaster. Sam.
#53351From: Anthony RamirezMar 25, 1993 10:17 PM
I bought my Toaster from B&H Photo/Video in Jan. and have been very satisfied with it. Although my order did get screwed up and I had to wait a week before it was shipped but other than that I am happy with the service. <<< Tony D. Tracer >>>
#53375From: Sam SternMar 26, 1993 9:57 AM
I'm sorry you had a little problem, mistakes CAN happen. Luckily it doesn't happen very often around here and it gets rectified REAL fast. I'm glad it worked out in the end for you. We hope you will continue having a long happy relationship with our company. Sam.