CompuServe Thread

#Wild cards

10 messages in this thread
#34032From: Jonathan BlackwellApr 7, 1993 10:28 PM
Regarding Amigas wildcards, etc.. You might want to note that other operating systems in place long before MSDOS, used the forward slash. MSDOS kind of invented it's own convention. Unix for one, is a prime example. The Amiga wildcard system is much more usable. Besides, like you said, you can use utilities to get the * functionality. I don't personally because I find AmigaDOS's implementation much more powerful. -Jonathan
#34058From: michael heinzApr 8, 1993 4:12 PM
Do you know why DOS uses the "\" instead of the "/" – it was because the first version of DOS had a flat directory (no subdirectories) and IBM decided to use "/" to separate command line options ("dir /w /one") So, when they added sub-directories, they chose "\" because they didn't want to confuse users. I realize you don't care, but there it is anyway.
#34071From: Mike SchillerApr 8, 1993 9:47 PM
Michael: I was under the impression that when MS-DOS had a flat filesystem it still hadn't been bought by Microsoft yet, let along IBM. So I don't think we can blame IBM for the \ character. // -Mike Schiller \X/ AMIGA! On AutoPilot in sunny Fort Lauderdale
#34118From: michael heinzApr 10, 1993 10:00 PM
Nah – DOS 1 was flat. Remember, the original PC was 64k and had a tape drive (cassette tape, that is) for storage.
#34138From: Mike SchillerApr 11, 1993 7:12 PM
Michael: Yes, it sure did, but what I'm saying is we can't blame IBM for that, that's how they got it. Don't get me wrong, it is/was/will always be a lame OS compared to AmigaDOS. // -Mike Schiller \X/ AMIGA! On AutoPilot in sunny Fort Lauderdale
#34164From: Vic WagnerApr 12, 1993 6:43 PM
Mike, We certainly CAN blame IBM for the '\'. MS-DOS in the early days would accept either. It was IBM who 'insisted' on the '\'.
#34167From: Jim Shaffer Jr.Apr 12, 1993 6:57 PM
Right! Up through 3.x at least, MS-DOS had an undocumented routine to change the switch character. I found out that if you changed it to, say, "-", you could use "/" in pathnames. I also found out that it liked things like "/dev/prn" for the printer just fine…
#34181From: Mike SchillerApr 13, 1993 12:58 AM
Vic: Oh, well in that case… You do of course realise that we're all wrong, and IBM is right, after all they are I B M, and after all, didn't they invent computers in the first place? 🙂 Actually there are a couple of packages out now that allow you to use the forward slash "/" instead of the \ on MSDOS, and I think there's even something that extends the filenames out to 32 characters or so, although I don't know how they do that. // -Mike Schiller \X/ AMIGA! On AutoPilot in sunny Fort Lauderdale
#34077From: Jonathan BlackwellApr 9, 1993 12:02 AM
Interesting historical trivia. It still makes it a terrible OS. -Jonathan
#34067From: Ron LegroApr 8, 1993 7:45 PM
I agree with your comments. I like AmigaDOS' flexibility. For newcomers, it's confusing, but stick with it and it pays off.