CompuServe Thread

#Don't be FOOLED

41 messages in this thread
#54485From: Luke H MontgomeryApr 11, 1993 4:49 PM
I want to pass on some knowledege that I've learned the hard way (read incredible cost-overruns)… First, as a guy that bought an Apple ][+ many years ago because it did four color (!) graphics, has been through to SVGA and 3D Studio on the PC, I have to say that I have great respect for what can be accomplished with the Toaster and Lightwave… but… For those of you considering getting into this stuff with visions of creating beautiful lightwave animations FOR PAY, don't be FOOLED by the ads that show beautiful still images, or the NewTek demo tapes, and think you can do animations like that for just a couple of thousand bucks… You CAN do some amazing stuff with the Toaster, as long as you have enough $$$ and TIME… To be realistic, in a commercial environment you need: 1) Amiga and Toaster (THIS is the "couple of thousand" part) 2) a 68040 accelerator card (without it, or even with a '030 card, you can easily wind up spending an HOUR rendering time per frame (1/30 second!!) of a moderately complex scene with SHADOWS and REFLECTIONS turned on. Can you spend 12.5 days waiting for a 10-second piece to render? If not, add a thousand-plus $$$ to the system cost. 3) a single-frame videotape machine (e.g. Sony EVO-9650 for about four-and-a-half grand). Sorry folks, renting time or farming out frame-to-tape work won't cut if if you're doing the animations for $$$ and you need it done NOW. Don't get me wrong – the Toaster is truly amazing stuff. B*U*T you'll HAVE to spend some significant bucks if you want to REALLY use Lightwave for animation – despite what the demo tapes and ads may lead you to believe… don't be mislead. It's a lot like the VAR that walks into a business with a $999 PC saying "Hey, you can completely modernized your business with this machine! Yes, sure you may want to expand it a bit, but it's still a great value!! (Hint, the "expanded price" is more like 6 thousand!) Bottom line: Don't expect to buy a Yugo and run the Indy 500 with it… Luke Montgomery
#54504From: Erik FlomApr 11, 1993 6:52 PM
Well, Luke that may be true for you, but not for me. I get by just fine doing LightWave anims 'FOR PAY' without owning a Single Frame recorder. In most large cities, it is much cheaper to rent the needed equipment than it is to make payments on a deck that will get occasional use. My system was purchased over the course of several years for around $7-8K. Someone looking to buy the same equipment today could do it for less than half that price. (Including all the extra 3rd party software add-ons.) The Toaster – as part of an integrated system with 040, HDs, etc. – could be better likened to a Formula 1 race car without tires, rather than a Yugo trying to 'run the Indy 500'. If you throw enough money at a Toaster system, it CAN perform with the big boys. It is fortunate that you have to throw far less money at the Toaster to get professional results than you do with any other platform. Keep On Toastin' Erik Flom P.S. I also don't think the videos are misleading. I think it is the buyers responsibility to research his/her choices. If you're going to be spending a minimum of $3000 (a BASE Toaster system) for some hardware, you should look for information in places besides just ads & promotional literature.
#54524From: Luke H MontgomeryApr 11, 1993 11:28 PM
Sorry, no intention to singe other Toasters with my flame about Toaster system costs… It just griped me a little after reading a LOT and doing a LOT of talking with folks, none of whom emphasized the importance of having an '040, etc., etc…. for doing Lightwave without having to let the machine render for DAYS… I just wanted to put up this flag about cost and expectations based on video samples and ads (while I was waiting for my '030 system to finish another 51-minute-per-frame rendering >:-( ) By all means, the Toaster is a bargin (and that's based in 10 years of broadcast television experience and 8 years of microprocessor system background). Even more so when LW 3.0 comes out… Don't get me wrong, if you need a REAL basic switcher with some digital effects, and a CG that's OK (but ain't no Chyron…), and one of the best 3D packages I've seen on a desktop system, then Toaster's the way to go… Just remember, don't be misguided by the "all this for peanuts" hype… Make sure your budgets include EVERYTHING if you plan to do a lot of Lighwave…. or else plan on writing out some large checks as you stumble along… waiting, and waiting, and waiting… I'll be happy to pass on via CI$mail some hard won knowledge and some POSITIVE recommendations for the TOASTER to anyone who's interested… Keep on Toastin' Luke
#54667From: CARL J. CUNEOApr 13, 1993 8:36 PM
Luke: How do I benefit from your hard-won knowledge. I have been hesitating for 3 months over whether to buy a Toaster Workstation, and keep being pulled back by the new stuff coming out for the PC? The more I read and listen to others, the more confusing everything gets. Carl.
#54619From: Rodney MassmanApr 13, 1993 7:54 AM
I'm going to have to look at the Revolution tape again because that's the first thing I solidly saw of the Toaster. No dealers or Amiga shops around here. But for now I almost have to agree with Luke that it was misleading. I don't believe there was any adequate description of what was needed for the Toaster to do what was shown – that in itself is false advertising. (At least in my opinion) It's like selling a flashlight or toy and not putting on the cover whether the batteries are included. The Toaster (LightWave) being the flashlight. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54644From: Erik FlomApr 13, 1993 1:27 PM
Obviously, you don't follow the Multimedia claims made by vendors on other platforms? NewTeks ads were no more deceptive than those of any other multimedia product. You can't fault NewTek if YOU didn't do research beyond looking at their promotional tape. . . Keep On Toastin' Erik Flom
#54652From: Jim S. RoofApr 13, 1993 3:00 PM
There was a fine print description at the end of the tape that clearly stated what was needed for animations to be produced. If you were looking at a copy perhaps that was left off. Or perhaps the complaining parties were so egaww over the thing that the tape never got that far for all the rewind searches etc.
#54673From: Erik FlomApr 13, 1993 9:29 PM
I wasn't the one complaining . . . I think NewTeks Revolution video is something to shoot for, not to shoot down. :^) Keep On Toastin' Erik Flom
#54713From: Rodney MassmanApr 14, 1993 10:38 AM
From what I understand, the Revolution tape took 4 VCR's plus 4 TBC's to produce. Now if your talking to a general Amiga audience and don't tell them that – you've got a bunch of Toaster owners who later say EGAD!! Unless they know this, or find this out first – and it shouldn't be research that makes AT&T and Shell Oil Rich! It should be research that's available to the common man/woman. Like here on Compuserve, and here on this forum, which is NOW, where it is. (Thank You, Thank You (taking a bow)). -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54733From: Erik FlomApr 14, 1993 1:42 PM
Funny, I heard it was done with one D-2 deck, but since most high-end decks have the TBCs built-in, 4 decks is not really that much . . . You could rent that for less than $1K/day. Seems like any of these questions relating to the Toaster can be answered BEFORE buying by using CIS, or reading any of a number of magazines (Video Toaster User, Desktop Video World, AV-Video, New Media, etc.) devoted to MultiMedia products. Total investment in research would be less than $50. Keep On Toastin' Erik Flom
#54712From: Rodney MassmanApr 14, 1993 10:38 AM
As I'd said earlier, I'm in a small town. I rode to Findlay, Ohio to get the Taped Demo (Revolution). Talked to the man there about the Toaster, who didn't have anything – a camera shop – and he gave me a number to a place in *I think* Troy, Ohio – called them, all he wanted was to charge me lessons and tape my animations at charge per frame. I asked him about the Toaster and of course, he loved it. Mind you I hadn't checked with photographic outlets to find out just what a SFR runs for. I figured at that time that a Single Frame VCR wasn't going to be too much over a standard VCR. So, no longer are we considering a NewTek Toaster, a Commodore Amiga or a computer item. Were getting into Photographics, which is a Pandora's box in itself (speaking Hindsight 20/20). When I saw Revolution it said 'all this for $2500' at the bee frame that, I have to admit, sold me (trying hard not to speak as some ignorant consumer – but finding out otherwise). I trusted NewTek. I trusted Commodore when I bought the Amiga that they wouldn't mess me over later like Atari tried to with their XL line after I bought the 800 and later sold due to the XL line trying to drop my 800's price substantially. I guess what your saying and is the bottom line, is not to place trust in a company selling it's product and in a sense, to displace patriotism to that product. True, if I'd known then what I know now, there'd be no complaint, as is your case. I'm not a videographer, just a 3d nut and enjoy creating my own anims. I'm not a pro – just a beginner – I guess, a wannabe. I'll work towards that end come hell or SFR! Someday soon I will purchase that SFR and hopefully, if nothing else has been hidden from me, I will be able to release these hot anims that everyone else has been able too. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54734From: Erik FlomApr 14, 1993 1:42 PM
An interesting thing I'd like to point out is that you're not grousing about having to buy an Amiga to use the Toaster. I don't remember them explicitly saying that you'd need an Amiga. Much less an accelerated 040 system and a big expensive hard drive to put your images on, if you really wanted to get serious about 3-D. That alone could EASILY double the cost of the 'Toaster System' but you seem to be willing to accept those expenses as a matter of fact? I would also like to point out that you DON'T need a SFR to create decent looking anmations with the Toaster, only if you want to output at the full 24bits @ 30FPS will you need an expensive recorder. Even some of your customers will be more than happy with your HAM animations recorded straight to tape. With a DCTV, you'll get even better results. Oh well, that's all for now, Keep On Toastin' Eirk Flom
#54892From: Rodney MassmanApr 16, 1993 1:59 PM
I already had the A2000 for quite some time beforehand and I knew the Toaster was built for my system. So that's a moot point. Yes, I'm working on that DCTV thing. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54914From: Erik FlomApr 16, 1993 6:09 PM
At least you're not like me: I bought the A3000, fully expecting to put a Toaster into it. NewTek announced the Toaster at the FAUG meeting in Oct of 90 or 91 and I found out then that 'NO, it doesn't work in an A3000'. I was crushed. I had to wait a year before I felt confident enough to buy one and try installing it. works fine now, though. Keep On Toastin' Erik Flom
#55110From: Rodney MassmanApr 19, 1993 11:51 AM
Yea, it'd be nice if they'd come out with something like the Toaster Cozzy for the A4000 as well. Maybe someday Commodore will get it's act together and act towards the benefit of Commodore users instead of their wallet sizes by coming out with non-Toaster friendly systems. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#55130From: Erik FlomApr 19, 1993 4:20 PM
If the message I read in the AmigaUser forums about the NewTek preview party at NAB is correct, I don't think the 4000 is going to need a Cozzy . . . (Now, it looks like I might need a 4000. :^) Keep On Toastin' Erik Flom P.S. Welcome to the 3-D field. (Steal my clients and you die, sucker! :^)
#54956From: Matthew J. W. RatcliffApr 17, 1993 10:35 AM
SUperMac Technology has been offering refunds, and announced this in several mac week mags, because their Digital Film product had literature that made claims that it could 'replace professional video equipment.' They lied, and they are probably being forced to retract the ads and offer refunds, among other consolation to their suckers, i mean users. This and every industry are rife with types who thing\k their profit is more important than The Truth. Amazing isn't it?
#55011From: Erik FlomApr 17, 1993 10:30 PM
I hadn't heard of that. That's pretty funny. I'm glad to see some people are taking advertisers to task for their blatant mis-statements. Thanks, Erik Flom
#55111From: Rodney MassmanApr 19, 1993 11:51 AM
Well, if someone doesn't hold advertisers resposible for their ads, it'll just get worse. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54593From: John GagerApr 13, 1993 12:18 AM
I think you misled yourself instead of someone else misleading you. As with any artistic medium, it takes a lot of devotion and time to get it right. Someone using Imagine, DCTV, and an Amiga 500 could create better animations than a less talented individual with a $50,000 Toaster system. It's all depends on how much time and energy you want to devote to it. Mind you, I'm not bragging since I have all the artistic talent of a rock, but I've seen other's do some fantastic stuff with very little resources. // \X/ John – K7KB (Who enjoys harrasing the vendors)
#54631From: Rodney MassmanApr 13, 1993 9:43 AM
I think Luke has a point and a very valid one. As I mentioned earlier, take a look at the Revolution tape and that points out clearly there is a misleading quality there. One only makes judgement based upon the information provided him/her. You cannot mislead YOURSELF. That's a physical impossibility. I've been mislead myself on various things and it has very little if nothing to do with artistic talent. Only upon tapping into this base did I find that DCTV was practically a hammer to the nail. You don't need artistic talent to drive a nail – it's just a tool – and tools can get very expensive as Luke was implying. Especially when you weren't aware you needed the hammer to hit the stupid thing. So we end up taking money out of petty cash to buy the unexpected we hadn't accounted for. Sure I could probably use my head (kinda painful) or a ballbat but a hammer is going to do a better job and a job it was built to do, and it could do it more efficiently. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54639From: BILL LEACHApr 13, 1993 12:32 PM
Rodney; The call on NewTek being misleading with the Revolution Tape can be a close call. They do show a bit of pretty fine video hardware even if they don't emphasize it importance to the project. They have a right to expect people to know or learn what sort of hardware is needed to do video work. The make "no bones" about what part of the video suite the toaster implements. -bill
#54714From: Rodney MassmanApr 14, 1993 10:39 AM
The point of contention is that >They have a right to expect people to know or learn what sort of hardware is needed to do video work.' I'm not so sure that is a right when selling a crossbread hardware utility to the general Amiga audience. If even a 'right' at all, but I understand your meaning as they expect you to know something of video. The switcher is nice/neat/cool/awesome but I really wanted LightWave 3d. Which is more computer oriented. If NewTek was targeting the Photographic industry they'd direct the Main majority of their adds to photographic magazines, and while a small percentage does in fact go to that, every issue of AmigaWorld is plastered with Video Toaster. If they say you can do this with $2500 then by G** you should be able to do this with $2500!! That's my contention – speaking of which, Newtek has been fairly quiet in this forum, as opposed to the welcome sight of ASDG and Syndesis. I'd welcome Newtek to explain this 'you can do this with $2500' (No bones) mystery brought about by the voice of Ken Nordine (I believe). -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54748From: JERRY HATCHETTApr 14, 1993 3:38 PM
I caught the fine print the very first time I watched "Revolution", and immediately jumped on this forum to begin gathering all the info I could. NewTek's approach is absolutely no different than every commercial you see for a new car, etc. They're gonna paint their product in the most attractive light possible, and I don't blame them. We, as consumers, are responsible for this strategy, because we've demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is the most effective way to sell products. How?? By BUYING the products, of course! Despite being a total Amiga illiterate a few months ago, I was able to put together a decent Toaster studio at what I feel was a more than reasonable total cost. If I had heeded advice from places like this on a more regular basis, I'd have done it for even less, by not ending up with several pieces of equipment that I can't effectively use! Anyway, I know it's frustrating to encounter all the added costs, but that's the way things are, and I'm afraid that's the way they're gonna stay. BTW, the ads for the Sunrize AD516 sound really great, and the product sounds most affordable also. However, they don't mention the fact that you'll need at least a 1 gigabyte hard drive to have any practical hopes of getting much use out of their system. It's nothing to get angry about, though…………. JERRY
#54893From: Rodney MassmanApr 16, 1993 1:59 PM
Oh I'm not angry, it's just that I've got the studio but no recording mechanism for the Lightwave anims, then I got to thinking about the course of events and re-viewing the Rev tape – and went from there. Basically – Wah! :> -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54680From: John GagerApr 13, 1993 10:30 PM
True, the tools for DTV can get very expensive. But what I'm saying is that it doesn't always have to be that way. If you are creative enough to find different ways to use that tool, or use just the ones that are right for you, then you can keep the cost's down. It's sounds like Luke didn't research the subject of DTV to find out what could be involved, so in a sense he did mislead himself. Sure the Revolution tape does look great, but as we both know it's a demo tape to show off what can be done with a DTV system, not how much it's going to cost or what else might be required to do those kind's of projects. That is the responsibility of the person getting into the field, not NewTek's. // \X/ John – K7KB (Who enjoys harrasing the vendors)
#54715From: Rodney MassmanApr 14, 1993 10:39 AM
Right, but if NewTek is getting into the field itself, then why the heck not tell the rest of us what the h*** we need to do the stuff they show us we can do!!!! That's the whole point. As I said earlier, I don't intend on making AT&T rich as well as Shell Oil calling and driving all over *blanks* half acre trying to find all this stuff out, that's needed to have a Desktop Video. Y'know, what half comes to mind is that these Amiga Forums are probably worth ten-fold any toaster/DCTV/SFR/TBC/SFC/ADPro or any other acronym they can think of – value in knowing what you have to have in order to do what you want to do – it's not a problem in research – it's a problem in availability of information to the general public. It all comes full circle I guess. I'm glad I'm here and the BEST PRODUCT I've ever seen on the Free Market Is AUTOPILOT!! Thank you Programmers. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54768From: Terry L. TaborApr 14, 1993 8:00 PM
Rodney, Excuse me for butting in here, but after reading this thread and seeing the same things being said over and over without really going anywhere, I decided to watch my copy of the Revolution tape to see what it really said. Mine must be different than yours because it says you can "get started" for just under $4000.00. It then goes on to say that a basic system uses a camera for input and a VCR to record the output. It then says a more advanced system adds a second camera. It then says to get full production you'll need to add two more VCR's and an edit controller (and shows them in the picture as it is saying this). At the end, in the edit scroll, it explains that the switcher inputs must all be time base corrected and that to do 3D animation you need a single frame capable VCR. Also, it says some features are only available with Toaster 2.0 software (at that time not yet available) and the ubiquitous "specifications subject to change". It seems that even without any external research Newtek tells you all you need to know in the Revolution tape (at least my version of it). With the exception of the fact that they didn't tell you that time base correctors and single frame capable VCR's are expensive, I think Newtek accomplished everything that you are complaining about in the very "Revolution" tape you are hitting at so hard. Give your tape another listen/look and tell me if I got a different version of the tape or not. I swear, they say $4000.00, not $2500.00, and they tell you everything you need in addition to the Amiga/Toaster combination either in the voice over during the tape or in the scrolling credits at the end. Sincerely, Terry Tabor
#54894From: Rodney MassmanApr 16, 1993 1:59 PM
Right, yea, the part about the cameras and recorder are fine, that's really not what I'm interested in. The part I was talking about was showing the animation of the bee buzzing and other 3d anims and the guy in the background saying 'I can do all this for $2500? Yes. But yes, I rescanned my tape again, and caught that scrolling text just last night on freeze frame – it says you must be single frame capable. Kinda contradictory isn't it? -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54911From: Terry L. TaborApr 16, 1993 5:59 PM
Rodney, If what you say is true, then it is contradictory. But the version I have, the voice over is completely different. During the segment you are referring to (Telephone, Bee), my version has the voice over saying "I can do this?", "Yeah!", "And this…", "And this…", etc… It doesn't mention price at all in this section on my copy. The reference to $4000.00 is at the beginning of the tape when it shows a Toaster Workstation. I guess the folks at Newtek revised the tape and the $4000.00 includes the price for an Amiga. Looking at my tape, I would say the biggest ommision in my opinion was that they didn't mention that Lightwave is much faster with an accelerated Amiga and at that time I don't think you could get a Toaster, Amiga, and accelerator card for $4000.00 (although it would be easy today). Although I don't agree with you in this case, I can sympathise with you. When I bought my first Amiga (I'm up to three, now), an A500, I bought a copy of Turbo Silver (predecessor to Imagine) with the belief that the animations I created could be played directly off of the floppies I stored them to. I was pretty disappointed when I found out otherwise. But I kept at it and have learned my lesson. Difference is, mine was a $100.00 lesson and yours was a $2500.00 lesson. But don't despair. If you want to get pretty good full color animations for not alot of cash, I heartily recommend DCTV combined with Scala MM200. From what I've tried (and I've tried alot), Scala MM200 has one of the fastest playback times. It even plays animations (in its own format, ANIM-32) directly from harddrive, faster than the same animation would play from RAM in Anim-5. That's my experience with large motion lots of movement animations. Terry Tabor
#55112From: Rodney MassmanApr 19, 1993 11:51 AM
Well, were kinda nitpicking here – I mean – were looking at a $2500 unit, and supposing you have an Amiga and that it's what the 'voice-over' guy has of course. 'I can do all this?' I'll go over the stupid thing again and – wait a sec I'll play it now—Thanks to AP –it's 'ALMOST LIVE' First Voice: "Then when your ready, LightWave will animate your scene just like this" (Chess – Queen moves) First Voice: "Or like this." (Telephone turns and opens) Second Voice: "Neat" First Voice: "Or this" (Bee buzzing and swiveling head – adjusting eyes) Second Voice: "Crazy" First Voice: "Or this" (Tuesday night at the movies) Second Voice: "Yea – and all this is included in the price of the Toaster?" First Voice: "You bet! It's each separate piece of production equipment that you NEED to make real broadcast quality television. Combined into one device, with one easy to use interface." And that's pretty much all I have to say about the topic. I've gotten psuedo support on my claim with the general concensus saying 'You should have known better than to believe Newtek's word.' The video, to be honest should have said 'You bet! With a Single Frame Recorder, all your three dimensional animations can come to life and present real broadcast quality results for television.' Were talking 3d here – every image on that segment was Lightwave generated – the first voice should at least mention a SFR. Oh well, at least it's settled what was actually said. I blame myself enouph – it's time for blame to also be portioned out. Nuff' said. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#55195From: Paul ToalApr 20, 1993 3:28 AM
There's nothing for you to snivel about. You just didn't watch the whole tape. You also jumped in blind. –Paul < Motorola Inside >
#54771From: John GagerApr 14, 1993 8:29 PM
Yep, it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if NewTek did a video showing how the Revolution tape was done and what kind of equipment it would require, as well as general price range. Then people would have a better understanding of exactly what they are getting into. A good friend of mine already has close to $35,000 invested in his Toaster/DTV system and he keeps wanting more. Sounds like a serious addiction to me <g>. // \X/ John – K7KB (Who enjoys harrasing the vendors)
#54694From: john bennettApr 14, 1993 6:52 AM
Thats why I love my Amiga Toaster sys. I have Alot of Compositional Talents (I got atleast one good eye) but I can't draw fer @#$%. I can model and render a PRETTY picture with LW though. And I never thought I would be into animation, But thats my Latest FAVE. Just wish I had the Talent for Original IDEAS, And halting TIME :^)> ….John
#54898From: Nathan WahlApr 16, 1993 2:21 PM
Hey, I see a pattern here. Are we all a bunch of closet artists that can't draw a straight line by hand, but give us an electronic 3D version of an Etch-A-Sketch and whole new worlds appear? I got my Toaster on day -29 to do simple commercials for local cable. Wondered who in their right mind would want to do this 3D stuff (especially with all of the time and specialized equipment that I >knew< would be needed), and so tried it. <He's hooked, he's hooked, his brain is cooked>. Never did a single commercial. Oh, well, needed a new hobby to absorb all of my time and spare change anyway. Beats the bars. Anybody else get started this way? ~p BTW people, I'm gone 5 days and you post 200+ msgs. Sheesh…. 8) … Nate, Emerald Video. Flyin' IFR on AP
#54978From: Peter GreciApr 17, 1993 2:02 PM
I like yer Chant <He's Hooked He's Hooked his brain is cooked> I got started in 3D Long time ago in the Dark Ages of 3D on a Personal Computer when Antic Released their CAD 3D software by Tom Hudson. Even in Low Rez 16 colors I saw GREAT THINGS. Got an Amiga so I could do 4096 color 3D anims and Now I'm REALLY a 3D Junkie. I used to SLEEP…HONEST
#55006From: jeff HolinskiApr 17, 1993 9:21 PM
I also started with Cad 3D on the Atari and I still think that program whould have been ported to the Amiga. It was easy to learn, had a good interface and made an excellent starter package for 3D. Of course now that Tom's working on 3D Studio I doubt he'll have time to port it now. :^( You still can sleep, the secret is to do it while you're waiting on renders. Now if I could just keep from falling out of my chair when I nod off…. :^)
#55052From: Peter GreciApr 18, 1993 1:17 PM
Multi[ple machines rule out Sleep. I've currently got 3, tho one is a CDTV set up simply as a CDROM. I also tend to do other things on the 3000 while rendering as well. Like Writing Scripts or BBSing. Can't get away with that on my souped up 500 tho with only 512k of Chip ram tho.
#54744From: Peter GreciApr 14, 1993 3:23 PM
Thats ok, with 3D software even folks with the Artistic talent of a Rock can do nice looking work. It may not be Earth Shatterringly Gorgeous but you will be able to impress yer Friends and Neighbors hehehehehehehe I consider myself fairly adept at 3D Fiddling but Please NEVER ask me to draw something for you hahahahahahahaha. You'll get the Equivelant of Cave Paintings from the Prehistoric age.
#54774From: John GagerApr 14, 1993 8:52 PM
Hehe, well I do a mean stick figure, that's about the extent of my artistic talent and I flunked finger painting in grade school <g>. // \X/ John – K7KB (Who enjoys harrasing the vendors)
#54902From: Peter GreciApr 16, 1993 4:48 PM
Stick Figures eh??? Well maybe you could get a Shot on Liquid Televison. After all there's a segment on there called "Stick Figure Theatre" which is QUITE Entertaining. They usually do Clips of old Movies with the Actual Dialogue from the Original Film with STICK Figure animation usually on Lined Looseleaf paper. Recently I saw their version of "It's a Wonderful Life"