CompuServe Thread

#I'm back

5 messages in this thread
#46336From: Paul KudlachApr 20, 1993 1:02 AM
Jack, 1815-1914 certainly had some horrible civil wars. Somalia and Yugoslavia are civilian wars. These civilian wars are in a sense becoming World Wars because of the involvement of the United Nations. Human rights and perhaps even environmental issues may force nations to intervene in the internal affairs of other countries. If the Japanese can influence U. S. economic policy, what else is possible? I'm sure that the U. S. has involved itself in the internal affairs of Grenada, Panama, Iran, Vietnam etc. and probably other countries in less obvious ways. Paul
#46470From: Jack L. ChalkerApr 21, 1993 5:50 AM
Involving ourselves in the affairs of other nations is a constant, not something new, that's all I'm saying. And a good examination of the wars and revolutions around 1848 and 1871 will show you that civilian wars aren't that unusual, either. The most instructive thing about the Serbs and their ethnic clensing campaign is how eerily similar the political reaction is to that of German activities in that area in the Thirties. Europe could have stopped it when it first started but they said "Tsk tsk!" instead. Now that things are out of hand and beyond any real help, they are wringing their hands and saying "Oh, my! We wish we could do something for those poor wretches! More sanctions!" And since it is basically a European problem, we really couldn't do a thing without their support. It's over. The west failed again, as usual. I can only find amusement that it is the left, the very folks who were so against Vietnam and all the rest, even anti-Gulf War, who are crying the loudest for us to intervene militarily there, led by columnist Anthony Lewis, who always considered any intervention evil, while all the right wing institutions and politicians they always decried for this sort of thing are saying "No way."
#46588From: David GleasonApr 22, 1993 12:51 AM
Anecdote about U.S. involvement abroad (while living in Ecuador in '63): The President, Carlos Julio Arosemana Monroy, besides being anti-Yanqui, was a drunk, showed up in his cups at a diplomatic community reception. After more consumption, he said he would show his disdain, and climbed on the table, walked up it, stopped before the U.S. Ambassador and relieved himself. The U.S. financed and trained military overthrew the government in about 48 hours. This never appeared in the press in the U.S. In fact, Slime reported it in such a manner that one would have thought they were talking about an entirely different country. That was when I quit going to the U.S. Ambassador's monthly briefings for the U.S. business community. (Not because I was afraid he had not bathed; because we did not get the truth.) I keep looking for the word "Zenophobia" below the Great Seal on dollar bills…
#46612From: Jack L. ChalkerApr 22, 1993 5:39 AM
You actually expect the truth from government briefings? How naive…. I grew up in close proximity to Washington, D.C. I know better.
#46682From: David GleasonApr 22, 1993 9:54 PM
And I _learned_ better. My only excuse for going to the briefings is that I was 18 at the time, which also caused me some problems. They did not believe I was real, and I returned the sentiments intact.