CompuServe Thread

#Commodore Stock

29 messages in this thread
#137340From: Dale LarsonMar 28, 1994 7:10 PM
Did any one notice that Commodore stock was not traded on the NYSE today? Or that the WSJ carried an article with the headline "Commodore may face liquidation" (page B3)? — Dale L. Larson, Intangible Assets Manufacturing — INTERNET:dale@iam.com
#137349From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPMar 28, 1994 9:02 PM
I noticed the first (stock not traded) when I got home today. Should be interesting to see what happens in the next couple of days….
#137350From: Paul IdolMar 28, 1994 9:03 PM
Well, on that bright note there's a building I've been meaning to jump out of for quite some time now! Cheers! Paul
#137380From: daniel wolfMar 29, 1994 2:37 AM
my broker said there was 'an order imbalance' in Commodore – in other words, more sellers than buyers, causing a trading halt until price could be established. those with weak knees are bailing.
#137385From: Steve AhlstromMar 29, 1994 2:53 AM
Dan, Just out of curiousity … you buying, selling, or staying put?
#137400From: Richard EricksonMar 29, 1994 11:38 AM
Now the NYSE is deciding if Commodore should remain on the exchange, and the price is down to 75 cents. Richard -> AutoPilot on the 2.1/030 A1000
#137389From: gary vassalottiMar 29, 1994 7:51 AM
I have noticed with the Journal, that with certain stocks, the only NEWS that is reported is the bad news, and the good things that happen are ignored. If you followed chrysler when it almost whent belly up and hit $3 share, they placed large headlines with the negative news, and the positive news that was comming out on the company received small type in the middle of the paper.
#137404From: Dale LarsonMar 29, 1994 1:04 PM
Commodore stock trading on the NYSE is still halted while "the exchange reviews its eligibility for continued listing of the issue." While no stock has traded since the close of the market Friday, the noon asking price was 1.75 and offer was .75. WSJ didn't invent something. They came close to quoting Commodore's own financial report. — Dale L. Larson, Intangible Assets Manufacturing — INTERNET:dale@iam.com
#137480From: gary vassalottiMar 30, 1994 6:52 AM
Yes, I agree that the WSJ did not invent anything and was accurate in their reporting. I was not trying to imply otherwise. Gary
#137409From: Jerry ThompsonMar 29, 1994 2:14 PM
Does this mean the end of Commodore, for real, final? Is CBU stock worthless? -Jerry Thompson
#137410From: Steve AhlstromMar 29, 1994 2:28 PM
Jerry, Here are 2 stories (one liners, actually) that I just picked up in my ENS folder … Executive News Svc.($) List of 2 selected stories 1 RTf 03/29 1419 COMMODORE INTL <CBU.N> SAYS HAS "EVERY INTENTION OF 2 RTf 03/29 1418 COMMODORE INTL <CBU.N> SAYS EXPECTS STOCK TRADING … !1 Executive News Svc.($) RTf 03/29 1419 COMMODORE INTL <CBU.N> SAYS HAS "EVERY INTENTION OF RESTRUCTURING" REUTER !2 Executive News Svc.($) RTf 03/29 1418 COMMODORE INTL <CBU.N> SAYS EXPECTS STOCK TRADING … COMMODORE INTL <CBU.N> SAYS EXPECTS STOCK TRADING CAN RESUME IN DAY OR TWO REUTER
#137413From: Soft-Logik Tech SupportMar 29, 1994 3:48 PM
It appears that Commodore stock is trading again at $1. Michael @ Soft-Logik Publishing Corp.
#137414From: Steve AhlstromMar 29, 1994 4:03 PM
You're right, it appears they've resumed. In the meantime, I just picked this up from ENS … RTf 03/29 1440 Commodore <CBU.N> sees trading resumption PHILADELPHIA, March 29 (Reuter) – Stock trading in Commodore International Ltd is likely to resume within a day or two and the company intends to restructure its finances, a company official said. "We have every intention of restructuring," said Jeff Porter, Commodore's director of advanced technology. He said he expected trading in the stock, halted while the New York Stock Exchange reviews its eligibiilty for continued listing, to resume once exchange officials have had a chance to talk to Commodore chief financial officer Hock Tan, who has been unavailable Monday and today.
#137469From: Don Curtis/SYSOPMar 30, 1994 1:13 AM
Steve, And a late entry retracting earlier statements: Executive News Svc. RTf 03/29 1904 Commodore <CBU.N> says trading prospect unknown PHILADELPHIA, March 29 (Reuter) – Commodore International Ltd <CBU.N> said it did not know whether or when a previously announced trading halt would be lifted and said comments earlier in the day by a company official on that and other issues were unauthorized and inaccurate. "We do not know whether or when the previously announced trading halt in Commodore stock on the New York Stock Exchange will be lifted," Commodore said in a statement. Commodore chief financial officer Hock Tan said in a telephone interview the company had spoken with exchange officials today, but had no knowledge of when trading might resume. Don
#137412From: Dale LarsonMar 29, 1994 3:36 PM
Hardly. I mean, it might, but it also might just mean the Medhi is playing head games with the banks. — Dale L. Larson, Intangible Assets Manufacturing — INTERNET:dale@iam.com
#137415From: Jerry ThompsonMar 29, 1994 4:23 PM
Well, I guess I can hope that Irving and Mehdi were just manipulating the stock to drive it lower so they can buy big before it goes up again. I can't believe I'm actually wishing some fat cats are manipulating stock prices to line their already overstuffed pockets. The reason I'm doing freelance work from home now is because of high level corporate shenanigans that I had no control over. I like working from home a lot, but the timing wasn't my choice. -Jerry
#137727From: Andrew ChristieApr 1, 1994 7:26 PM
>>Well, I guess I can hope that Irving and Mehdi were just manipulating the stock to drive it lower so they can buy big before it goes up again.<< Do you actually believe this? Let me ask you, how do you manipulate a company's stock. The only way they could do that is to falsify the financial statements, and that is difficult to do being audited annualy. I doubt the financial statements are distorted seeing as how the are in line with previous quarters. -=Andrew=-
#137812From: Dale LarsonApr 2, 1994 9:41 PM
Commodore's last annual report had an auditor's statement which indicated that the auditor could not verify the numbers. Whether or not the numbers are falsified, the words are exagerated. — Dale L. Larson, Intangible Assets Manufacturing — INTERNET:dale@iam.com
#138002From: Richard EricksonApr 4, 1994 1:08 PM
That's standard procedure for auditors. Richard -> AutoPilot on the A1000
#138003From: Dale LarsonApr 4, 1994 1:24 PM
I'm 90% sure that this was a non-standard auditor's statement. It was basically an auditor's statement which said "we haven't audited anything." — Dale L. Larson, Intangible Assets Manufacturing — INTERNET:dale@iam.com
#138016From: Richard EricksonApr 4, 1994 5:07 PM
My wife who is a controller said it's just the auditors way of protecting themselves in case something were to come up after the audit to change things. In this case it's probobly the auditors saying, "Don't blame us!".
#138058From: J Saperstein/FontBankApr 5, 1994 12:10 AM
"I'm 90% sure that this was a non-standard auditor's statement." Whoa! If that's the case it means the CPA's felt uncomfortable issuing an opinion. That's grounds for delisting from the stock exchange in and of itself. Sounds like Commodore's problems could be even more significant than stated to date. Jerry
#138073From: Dale LarsonApr 5, 1994 7:06 AM
That was the auditor's statement from the financial report that has been out for months (but was six months late). — Dale L. Larson, Intangible Assets Manufacturing — INTERNET:dale@iam.com
#138074From: Dale LarsonApr 5, 1994 7:21 AM
From the 1993 Anual Report, "Report of Independent Accountants," dated 18 October, 1993, last paragraph: "Because of the possible material effects of the uncertainty about whether the Company will continue as a going concern discussed in the preceding paragraph, we are unable to express, and we do not express, an opinion on ht econsolidated financial statements as of 30 June 1993 or for the year then ended." Coopers and Lybrand were the accountants. — Dale L. Larson, Intangible Assets Manufacturing — INTERNET:dale@iam.com
#137849From: Jerry ThompsonApr 3, 1994 2:33 AM
There are many ways to manipulate the price of a stock and it is very easy to do if you are the management of the company. Companies pull sales, debts, depreciations, inventory into and out of quarter figures to inflate or deflate quarterly reports. "Distorting" quarterly reports is a standard mode of operation in large businesses. There is a large gray blur between distortion and falsification, which is also pretty easy and painless. If you cook the books and someone complains (i.e. sues), then you reach a settlement and move on. You have to do some really serious illegal activities to even get so much as a reprimand from the SEC. Take a look at Michael Millken and his cronies. They illegally bought and sold billion dollar companies, broke practically every exchange law there is, and trashed the US economy. This went on for years and they almost got away with it. Some would say they DID get away with it. Millken is out of jail already and holding business seminars at UCLA! If you think I'm saying that the big business mangement practices in corporate America are crooked, then you're right. We just need more lawyers to keep an eye on 'em. -Jerry Thompson
#137884From: Black Belt SystemsApr 3, 1994 1:23 PM
"We just need more lawyers to keep an eye on 'em" <gag> –Ben …via AutoPilot
#137889From: Robert ComerApr 3, 1994 2:30 PM
>"We just need more lawyers to keep an eye on 'em" ><gag> Gag is right… Who's going to watch the lawers? Bob Comer — Cruising the nets on Autopilot! Cheyenne, Wyoming U.S.A.
#137961From: Jerry ThompsonApr 4, 1994 12:44 AM
>>"We just need more lawyers to keep an eye on 'em" >><gag> >Gag is right… Who's going to watch the lawers? My guess would be… more lawyers? Okay, maybe I should have put a smiley on that one. I hope no one coughed up a bit of lung or anything on a quick read through of my message. I don't want to have to have my lawyers counter sue your lawyers. -Jerry Thompson
#137893From: Paul IdolApr 3, 1994 2:42 PM
<g> Paul