CompuServe Thread

#4000 / 40

6 messages in this thread
#138582From: Wes TattersApr 9, 1994 8:15 PM
I am looking at purchasing a 4000/40 in the near future but have become concerned by an increasing number of comments about performance problems especially with read to memory. Can anyone give me some insight into this area. Secondly how does a 1200 with a 50mhz 68030 and 68882 compare to the 4000/40. Thanks –> Television without lights is Bad Radio 🙂 –> WES TATTERS, BRIZ 31, AUSTRALIA –<
#138583From: Paul IdolApr 9, 1994 8:45 PM
I've got a 1200 in that config – it's about 1/2 integer, 2/3 graphics, 1/4 fp. General numbers. But 4000s can be GREATLY sped up by improved memory schemes – with replacement CPU cards and such. And there's also a rumoured 40MHz 4000 on the way from C=. Paul
#139120From: Wes TattersApr 14, 1994 8:08 AM
Paul which way are your figures . 1200 faster or 4000 faster : – ) –> Television without lights is Bad Radio 🙂 –> WES TATTERS, BRIZ 31, AUSTRALIA –<
#139154From: Paul IdolApr 14, 1994 6:05 PM
Sorry, 4000 faster, all around. And with a replacement CPU card that provides either better memory management, a faster chip, or both, you can REALLY realize a speed advantage. On the other hand, my 1200 setup would be maybe $1500 today, whereas CEI's 4000 packages are MUCH more. Paul
#139473From: Wes TattersApr 16, 1994 8:55 PM
Tell me more about replacement CPU cards on 4000. I have heard a little about the 4000's memory problems : -) whats the scoop ? –> Television without lights is Bad Radio 🙂 –> WES TATTERS, BRIZ 31, AUSTRALIA –<
#139481From: Paul IdolApr 16, 1994 9:18 PM
There's the Warp Board, which combines an optional faster 040 (or you can use your 25MHz chip) with, I think, memory and a good SCSI2 controller. No idea of the price. There's the XCalibur, same deal on the CPU, supposedly BLAZING memory scheme, but no SCSI2. And there's another one at least. As to which one's the best deal, I don't know. Paul