CompuServe Thread

#WinImages3

5 messages in this thread
#193718From: Anthony RamirezApr 21, 1995 11:36 AM
>No – the Windows 3.1 version will NOT run under Windows NT. Also, the NT >version will NOT run under Windows. Thanks for explaining more about Windows and Windows NT. How will this change when Win95 comes out? Or will it?
#193831From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 22, 1995 12:10 AM
Anthony, Not true…I HAVE run WFW under Windows NT Server 3.5. I only did it to see if it worked…but it did. Don
#193863From: Bart Van BockstaeleApr 22, 1995 3:59 AM
>> Not true…I HAVE run WFW under Windows NT Server 3.5. I only did it to see if it worked…but it did.<< It won't seem to work anymore when you start to USE it! Bart Van Bockstaele at 100574.2352@compuserve.com … On AutoPilot and Amiga all the way from Belgium …
#193894From: Anthony RamirezApr 22, 1995 10:55 AM
>Not true…I HAVE run WFW under Windows NT Server 3.5. I only did it to >see if it worked…but it did. I am a bit confused. What were you able to run under NT? Is WFW stand for Windows For Workgroup? Please explain.
#193944From: Black Belt SystemsApr 22, 1995 2:47 PM
Windows 95 is about 1/2 way between NT and 3.1 so some things will improve, some will remain weak. The interface is better, but there are a number of other problems remaining – I actually don't know abou thte 16mb limit problem… my hope is, it's gone, as it was one of those incredibly stupid limitations in the first place… –Ben …via AutoPilot