CompuServe Thread

#Multisync Monitors

16 messages in this thread
#50596From: Harry CallesisMay 26, 1989 10:38 PM
OK, folks, once more for the people wh missed it the first dozen or so times: Those of you who have purchased a multisync monitor for use with your Amiga system, which one did you buy and why? Right now I'm thinking more about the expanded graphics modes than the FlickerFixer. I want to get as many opinions as possible. Thanks.
#50681From: Steve AhlstromMay 27, 1989 1:34 PM
Harry, I use an ImTec 1455N — and love it. -sja
#50895From: Gregg TavaresMay 28, 1989 9:10 PM
Look into a NEC MultiSync 3D. I looks great on my Amiga and you can adjust it from the front to have as little or as much overscan as you want. GreggT \|// _OO // Echidna
#50919From: Steve AhlstromMay 28, 1989 10:59 PM
Gregg, I haven't seen the 3D, but did take a close look at the NEC Multisync II. The Imtec is a much better buy. -sja
#50798From: John SteidlMay 28, 1989 10:16 AM
Harry, I don't have a multisync; I bought the Zenith 1490. If the enhanced chip set simply provides an analog signal at 31.5 kHz, you could probably use the Zenith, although it definitely won't run off the standard video signal. There were rumors that Zenith might come out with a multisync version using flat mask technology, but I don't know where that stands. The main reason I bought the Zenith was the excellent color saturation–better than anything you've ever seen. Based on comments around here, though, I suggest you personally check out every monitor you're interested in. They're all different, and most of the criteria (other than price and reliability) are pretty subjective. Be sure you look at both text and graphics. John
#50850From: Paul DowgewiczMay 28, 1989 7:06 PM
Harry: I ended up buying a CTX 3435 multisync monitor. It was rated as best buy in PC Digest Magazine. It cost me $430. Unfortunately with the standard Amiga display mode, it just doesn't use the full capabilities. Would be nice if there was something to fill in those dark lines between pixels. Sometimes they even show up in interlace mode. The monitor seems to have nice color, although a little more glare than I'd like. I stuck a Flickermaster (dark plastic screen) over the monitor. Someone earlier left a message recommending the Zenith 1490. We've got one at work, and although the colors are the best I'bve seen, it does seem to have an alignment problem. It's very touchy when it comes to outside interference. A review a few months ago confirmed this. The reviewer got five units, and no two acted alike. This was early in the production of the unit, so I don't know if they worked out their problems yet. Good Luck, Paul
#50925From: Don Curtis/SYSOPMay 28, 1989 11:09 PM
Paul, Get the program LACE.ARC in LIB 13. That'll set your machine in interlace mode at any resolution. That'll fill in those blank lines. Don
#51127From: David KieltykaMay 29, 1989 10:33 PM
Harry, You'll need a monitor capable of resolving at least 1280 vertical lines if you want to make use of both new ECS modes. I know Nanao makes a 19" FlexScan capable of such resolution, and I also believe NEC's Multisync XL can handle it, but I'm not familiar with any others (altho I know they exist). The Nanao is a terrific monitor, but with a price to match–3K+. The XL is sharp but suffers a bit from the usual Multisync flat color syndrome. -Dave
#51129From: John BushMay 29, 1989 11:08 PM
With regard to multisync monitors on the Amiga, will they be required to use the enhanced video modes with 1.4? The reason I ask is because I'm going to be purchasing a 500 and was planning on getting the Commodore 1084S monitor with it. However, should I just save up some more dough and get a multisync so that I'm ready for the new graphics modes when they are developed? Thanks, John P.S. If I do get a mulitsync, the monitor will end up being more expensive than the computer! (By the way, I'm typing this on my IBM — is there any chance my EGA monitor will work as a temporary monitor for the Amiga? I have a Samsung CM4531 monitor….)
#51173From: Don Curtis/SYSOPMay 30, 1989 3:09 AM
John, Yes…the new video modes will require a monitor that'll go to 31.5KHz horizontal sync…so, yes, a Multi-Sync should be used so you can use all Amiga video modes. No, an EGA only montior won't work, a VGA only monitor will work in the new resolutions…but only with those new video modes, it won't work for standard modes. Don
#51239From: John BushMay 30, 1989 3:20 PM
Okay, that answers that question… I think I'll stick with Commodore's 1084S monitor to save some money. Anyway, will my EGA monitor work with the current Amiga modes? (This way I can get the 500 now and share my EGA monitor between the IBM and Amiga until I can afford the 1084S.) The Samsung EGA supports 2 horizontal scanning frequencies, 15.75 KHz and 21.85 KHz. The former is for CGA modes(320×200, 640×200) and the later for EGA(640×350). It seems logical that the monitor should have no trouble displaying Amiga horizontal resolutions of 320 or 640 and a vertical resolution of 200. As for interlace or overscan, I don't know. I'm just guessing, though — I'm no more than a casual computer hobbyist, not a technician… There may be some intrinsic differences between the Amiga and IBM that would make this impossible. John
#51318From: Don Curtis/SYSOPMay 31, 1989 3:06 AM
John, NO, EGA monitors will not work with the Amiga. The A500, with it's present video modes uses 15.7KHz horizontal sync and 60Hz vertical sync. Those are the NTSC standard sync rates (TV sync rates). EGA uses something like 25KHz sync rates for horizontal sync…so will not work with the Amiga. Don
#51273From: Harry CallesisMay 30, 1989 8:38 PM
I thought that the 31.5KHz (available on most multisyncs) only allowed 800×600 resolution (or was that 640×400? I can't keep track 8^) ); Dave K. says the new modes go to 1280 … Am I missing something fundamental (again)? Thanks everyone for your answers so far – I'm still shopping, so keep'em coming!
#51322From: Don Curtis/SYSOPMay 31, 1989 3:24 AM
Harry, I don't have my notes in front of me, but no…I don't recall anything about a 1280 resolution mode in the new chipset. Don
#51326From: Khalid AldoseriMay 31, 1989 5:27 AM
Don, there is a new 1280 resolution mode. Khalid.
#51233From: Betty Clay/SYSOPMay 30, 1989 2:10 PM
I have a Princeton Graphics Ultrasync. Very nice. Betty