CompuServe Thread

#when will PgS 2.0 ship?

28 messages in this thread
#33315From: Barry DowellMay 13, 1990 10:16 PM
Just wondering people — here I am only about 3 months after getting PageStream 1.8, and now we have version 2.0…. Does anyone have info on when it will ship — I see the $75.00 price tag on the update and hope that I can get my work to pay for it…. At least now it will allow you to use Adobe Type 1 fonts!! Hoooray!! That Apple LaserWriter II NTX with 434 fonts (at my full time job) won't be going to waste after all!! (as well as the L-300!!!)
#33318From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.May 13, 1990 11:59 PM
Barry, SoftLogik is up to its usual unethical practice of advertising a product that they don't have. I called then on Friday, 5/11 after seeing the 2.0 ad. I realized that they had never sent me my update from 1.6. (I had long ago put the package away and had not even thought about it in almost a year since 1.6 was unuseable) They insisted that they _had_ sent me 1.8, but finally agreed to send me another copy. I asked about 2.0 and the girl at the other end said she knew nothing about it (a typical SoftLogik response). She said that the ad "came out early" and that they "have no idea when 2.0 will be available." SoftLogik advertised Pagestream (it was called something else at first) for over a year before they shipped it. During that year they told blatant lies about the delay, often reasuring callers that the product was in boxes 'ready for shipment' as soon as they could get to them, but that the stacks of boxes containing the Atari version was in the way! The release was unuseable due to bugs, which they denied. Then they ran ads announcing that an upgrade was shipping long before it became available. I think that magazines should exercise some responsibility toward the consumer and refuse to run ads until SoftLogik can actually produce the product. Don't hold your breath for 2.0! Rich
#33395From: Barry DowellMay 15, 1990 4:02 PM
I had much the same complaints before about the company (SoftLogik) and still have many complaints — among those the famous "never shipped" product that I kept hearing about before and their offerring the product for $50 for a limited time only (while it was vaporware), but never going back and offering the same sort of thing again (I didn't buy it originally because of the bad rep, and didn't want to pay full price for it to find out how much stuff had been fixed)…. My rantings stirred things up over in AmigaTech for quite a while, but most people just considered that I was bitching because I felt I'd been cheated out of a great offer — actually I was more bitching because the company deserved the bad press. I still have yet to hear back from them (negative or positive) about the possibilities of some sort of free evaluation copy for my work (I work for a service bureau in the D.C. area), and to get the program had to make other arrangements. Currently we still don't support the product here at my work, but I am hoping to have my work pay for the update when it becomes available (which as you point out could be sometime next year!!). Definitely not a well run organization….
#33400From: Ken RobertsMay 15, 1990 4:42 PM
Barry: Which service bureau do you work at? I live in the DC area and use a few bureaus with PageStream output. ===Ken
#33402From: Barry DowellMay 15, 1990 5:43 PM
I work for a company called Corporate Press. We are just outside of the Beltway in the Landover area, and have only recently moved into the PostScript service bureau area… I am the "expert" in this area for the company, so most of the software decisions are helped along by me, though there are only so many packages we can serve. We could definitely handle the PostScript output files that PageStream generates and you are welcome to check out our services…. Leave me email if you want more info…
#33855From: Ken RobertsMay 23, 1990 9:03 PM
Barry: That's really interesting about Corporate Press–I've been using Corporate Press II for all the PostScript output I've done from the Amiga. Mike Pummill has been really helpful. ===Ken
#33877From: Barry DowellMay 24, 1990 7:29 AM
Glad to hear that Ken, and yes, Mike is normally very helpful (at least to customers ;-} ) BTW, in the end you wind up getting Lino service from us if you are going that far… Laser only output from CPii at this point… (Lino's aren't cheap :-> )
#33491From: Christopher TolmieMay 17, 1990 4:11 AM
Barry, I work for a service bureau here in Delaware, and I'm not too sure if we can get work to pay for the update either, guess I'll have to go to the bathroom mirror and work on my approach to the boss, problem is the guy in the mirror looks just like him and he's been keeping me up later each night reading CIS messages and replying to them. B^) [sigh] Our VT4300P is now giving our Amiga a trying time ever since we put the 33MHZ '030 from GVP into it. Seems that the centronics port won't handle anything that has a clock faster than 7MHZ! I got to keep pulling the card out of the socket to ouput to our imager! Putting the jumper in place and cold-booting doesn't help! I have to physically remove the board! [sigh] chris AT&G
#33684From: Ray LewisMay 20, 1990 11:35 AM
Chris: What is the cost of a postscript compatible Linotron setup that can handle newspaper width output? We currently have on our net my 2500/30 Amiga as well as several 386s with Ventura. Since we write and spec quite a few ads for the NY Times and Wall Street Journal, but have a third company do the layout and typesetting, my bosses asked me what it would cost for us to set up an ad agency division in house that could do this instead, and let us keep the money while giving the client better control over the product (fewer suppliers in the loop). ?|^] Ray Lewis
#33735From: Black Belt SystemsMay 21, 1990 5:21 PM
IT may have been buggy, but it was NOT unusable. We used it from the first release, and got a huge amount of work out of it in the initial version. 1.8 is very nice (and stable) and we still get a lot of work out of it. Ben Amateur Radio Callsign is A A 7 A S
#33770From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.May 21, 1990 11:51 PM
Ben, I DON'T want to start these wars again. Pagestream 1.6 was unuseable for us in a professional graphics environment. Going to Lino was a nightmare. Loss of data was a nightmare. Unexpected corruptions of the page format was a nightmare. I have been a registered owner of PageStream since it was first released. I have JUST now received the 1.8 upgrade! I don't think I'll even take a look at it. It's just not worth the learning curve at this time for me. I _will_ try out 2.0 when it's available, although ProPage 2.0 may be out before. I would really like to see Saxon, but my dealer has never heard of it. I can't tell from messages here whether it's in final released form or a late beta. Rich
#33375From: Steve JessMay 15, 1990 1:00 AM
Barry: SL's press release (which Dr. Rose apparently hasn't read – see the other message) says available June 1990. It's a shame some people can't find anything better to do than complain. I've been hearing the same b*thcing for about a year over PgS…I've bitched myself..but some of the complainers don't seem to have noticed that the program GETS BETTER with each release. When (not if) it's released, I'm sure 2.0 will have bugs, but it will probably have some good solid advantages, too. sj
#33396From: Barry DowellMay 15, 1990 4:02 PM
What press release, and how come I didn't receive any kind of notification? (Actually never received any kind of notice that I might have been added to the mailing list, or list of registered users….)
#33424From: Lloyd W. Dull IIIMay 15, 1990 11:00 PM
Barry, You haven't gotten any notification about 2.0 yet because they won't send out the notifications until the program is ready to ship – and that is supposed to be at the end of June. The "press release" has appeared on SL's BBS, and on their section on GEnie. Lloyd
#33445From: Barry DowellMay 16, 1990 7:20 AM
Lloyd, I don't even have the number for the BBS… After sending in the registration I have absolutely nothing that shows that they received the registration and am now on the mailing list — It would help if they took time to send back a card thanking you for registering the product (like so many other companies do).
#33459From: Lloyd W. Dull IIIMay 16, 1990 7:45 PM
Barry, Not every company takes the time or expense to send a "thank you" note for the registration cards. But that's neither here nor there. When the upgrade is about ready to ship they will start sending out notices. If you hear about OTHERS getting notices, and you haven't gotten yours yet, THEN it is time to "worry", not until. If you sent your registration card, you'll get a notice. Lloyd
#33499From: Barry DowellMay 17, 1990 9:08 AM
While I could take the ball in my hands and run with it by having sent the registration card in RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, it would still be nice to think that a company that is getting my hard earned $$$ would take the time to acknowledge that they know I am here and have spent the $$$ on them/their product. I will be waiting with baited breath to see when others are receiving their notices, and will not start ranting and raving again until then. (Only started doing it now after seeing the ad in the magazine and wondering what others knew).
#33551From: Steve JessMay 18, 1990 12:16 AM
I didn't receive any notification, either, except seeing the ad in AmigaWorld. Soft-Logik had the press releases uploaded to their BBS. As for no notification in the mail, I think most registered users, even the satisfied ones like me, have heard a lot of this stuff about upgrades being ready real soon now. We know better. Still, I'm looking forward to the product. sj
#33566From: SyndesisMay 18, 1990 10:05 AM
Has this press release been uploaded to Compuserve yet? I'd like to see it… or can you direct me to this ad?
#33602From: Steve JessMay 18, 1990 11:39 PM
The press releases haven't been posted as far as I know…but maybe if I can find them here I'll post them. The ad, which is vague and poorly-written, ison page 57 if the current AmigaWorld. sj
#33577From: ELLIOTT,RONALD J.May 18, 1990 4:02 PM
I protest the writings of those reviewers who, when they write about PageStream, spend more time talking about how it was then about how it is. I find it very usable, tho Lord knows it could improve. I will not, however, part with a thin dime, or concern myself in any slight way with the alleged existence of 2.0 til I see it on dealers' shelves. *** RJE ***
#33603From: Steve JessMay 18, 1990 11:44 PM
? type I agree with your generally cautious attitude. Waiting for it to appear on dealers' shelves might take a while, though. When registered users start gettig their upgrades, you'll see message traffic about it here. As someone who has only paid $55 for PageStream, received three upgrades, and gotten more then my money back in desktop publishing jobs, I'm willing to take the plunge. sj
#33413From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.May 15, 1990 8:22 PM
Steve, Everything I have posted about SoftLogik is accurate. The events happened just as I described them. They have lied to me and to others repeatedly. What 'press release' have they posted? Do you mean an advertisement? The human voice at SoftLogik (Gina ?) said she had, "NO IDEA" when 2.0 would be released. June, 1990? I think not. . . "It's a shame some people can't find anything better to do than complain. . . " Well, Steve. All of us have better things to do than complain, and we do them all the time. We also have the right to tell the truth, especially about the unscrupulous business practices of some of the companies with which we have dealt. What is really a shame is that such compaines continue to get away with this dishonesty, and that some people excuse them. Rich
#33552From: Steve JessMay 18, 1990 12:26 AM
? Richard: As for press releases, several have been posted on Soft Logik's BBS. The June 1990 date comes from the release announcing version 2.0. As for the "complaining" remark, I have yet to read a sinlge message from you, on -any- topic, that conveyed an attitude any better than the attitude reflected in your messages about PageStream. Waiting for it and using it have been frustrating experiences for me, too, and I have reflected that in some of my past message traffic. Howver, over the past year successive releases of it have been increasingly stable and user-friendly..and -that- is the truth as well. I have produced excellent work with PageStream, from version 1.5 on. While I sympathize with the problems of anyone who can't get a straight answer from a software company, I feel the vitriolic tone of your messages here does not reflect the attitude of many PgS users. sj
#33582From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.May 18, 1990 8:06 PM
Steve, Good luck with PageStream. If it works for you, fine. What ever makes your boat float. If you find fault with my attitude, that's your problem. The only negativism you've seen in my messages concerns problems like I've described with SoftLogik. You apparently have a problem with honesty. And you apparently need to win arguments by personal attack on someone with whom you are in disagreement. SoftLogik has published no 'press releases.' Messages posted to their own BBS hardly qualify. I have stated many times that my remarks have nothing to do with the program. I have every expectation that the programer(s) is (are) as dedicated to his/her craft as I am to mine. I think that SoftLogik's business practices are dishonest and unethical. I have a real problem with the mixed messages of a BBS posting/magazine ad which promises a June release and a company representative giving me a curt, annoyned answer that SoftLogik has "no idea" when the program will be released, and that their ad "was released a little early." Actually, I'm sorry that I ever got involved in this silly discussion again and I have no intention of carrying it any further. Happy computing. Rich
#33719From: Wayne ColeMay 21, 1990 1:59 AM
Steve, If you think Dr. Rose is in the minority, or unjustly hard on SoftLogik, I suggest you start calling them about the release date. Write to them about the bugs with step-by-step descriptions of the bugs and sample disks. A little such interaction with that company and you will realize that SL is lucky that nothing more offensive than "complaining" is aimed at them…. wmc
#33414From: Mark SterlingMay 15, 1990 8:38 PM
Steve, I'm one of those chumps that got the original PageStream for $55. I waited 8-9 months and the first two versions were plenty buggy. However 1.8 is pretty solid and much easier and faster to use than PPage. I love the AgfaCompugraphic fonts for display in PPage but they slow it down even more. I am not TOO excited about PageStream 2.0 and their June release only because I don't believe it will arrive in June. The outline screen font support will be a big plus and I will get it when it ships. So far I have only spent $55 for PageStream and have received 3 versions and two updates to the manual at no charge. They (Softlogik) must be trying to overcome their bad image. Meeting or coming close to June shipment of 2.0 would go a long way for image building. ….Mark
#33553From: Steve JessMay 18, 1990 12:28 AM
Mark: I agree. PageStream has a lot on the line with their June 1990 announcement. I hope they make it…but I'm not betting any money on it. sj