CompuServe Thread

#digitizing help?

22 messages in this thread
#18921From: Joe PastreckMay 2, 1992 7:59 PM
I have recently begun to download ham pictures from the libraries. And as a result, I have become interested in the digitizing process. I would like to get into it as a hobby, but I don't know where to start, or what kind of a setup is required. My current setup consists of, an A/500 w/1 meg ram. And 3-3.5 floppy drives. I would like to know what can or can't be done with this system. I also have an old black and white video camera around here somewhere. Also, I have converted several pictures from gif to ham, using hamsharp, and would like to know of how to retouch them after they have been converted. Finally, I have seen several ad's for digiview 4.0, the ad's state that all you need is an A/500, and you can "produce professional quality images." Does anybody have any input on this? I am open to any and all comments/opinions, they will be greatly appreciated. thanx Joe via…New England!
#18925From: Bill EastburnMay 3, 1992 12:25 AM
Joe, You can use a digi-view with your setup, but with certain limitations. The big constraint is your limited memory. Add two additional megabytes of memory and you will be able to do anything digi-view is capable of. Retouching pictures can be a problem. I am not sure what you plan to do in retouching. Most GIFs, or the ones I usually get, are 640×480 resolution, so I need to resize them. I use ADPro, from ASDG, for this and other functions. It is a fairly expensive program, but well worth it. Image Professional from Black Belt Systems is another image processor. These programs allow you to resize, crop, change lighting, texture, and produce other effects from your image. A cheaper alternative is to use a Ham paint program, like digi-paint, and to the best you can with it. If you are serious, I would suggest an image processor AND a paint program. ASDG has a lower priced version of their program called The Art Department, which is not as full of features as ADPro, but costs about half what you would pay for ADPro. Using any image processor will run into constraints with your present memory configuration however. Graphics EAT memory! Digi-view can produce excellent images, though it is very tricky to learn how to use properly. Lighting is terribly critical, as is your camera and lens. If you can afford a little more, a scanner like the JX-100 from Sharp will do a more consistent, and better, job. Full page (8×10) scanners run around $1,000 right now. The JX-100 can be had for around $600 or so, but only does about 1/3 page. Again, you may be bothered by your lack of memory. Another thing you might consider is adding a hard drive to your system. A 320×400 interlaced HAM image from digi-view will be 90k or so. It will be around 280k if you want to save in RGB. Saving your scans can eat up floppies. Most hard drives for the 500 can be obtained with memory as well, so you could kill two birds with one purchase. In graphics, more memory is better. 🙂 With a 500, you probably have [ MORE ]
#18988From: Stephen SponagleMay 4, 1992 4:34 PM
I've had Digi-View for years. It quit working one day. In a thread, I found the culprit might be VirusX, which I had started using, but did not use Digi-View for awhile. I got it going again, but now I have WB2.0 and it quit working again! It hangs when I execute the actual digitizing. The <WAIT> icon locks up, well, the whole dang computer locks up! Anybody know whats going on? (I tried killing all my commodities, no help). – Some day, this will be a catchy Whap! signature.
#18996From: Bill EastburnMay 4, 1992 9:30 PM
I understand NewTek has a fix for the WB2.0 problem for about $10. You need to call them. Bill, K3OZM
#19012From: Stephen SponagleMay 5, 1992 11:06 AM
Ten bucks, eh? Newtek ought upload this so those with DigiView could access it easily. Again, just like the SuperGen updated libraries, who but DigiView owners would make use of it? Are ya listening, NewTek? – Some day, this will be a catchy Whap! signature.
#18926From: Bill EastburnMay 3, 1992 12:25 AM
[ continuation ] 512k of CHIP memory. You can use that, but you may find you can't do all the effects you might want later on. Having your dealer upgrade you to 1 megabyte of CHIP memory would be a good move. Converting a standard 640×480 GIF with hamsharp runs right at your memory limit right now. Most will fit, a few detailled ones won't. 800×600 GIFs, or larger, are too big for your system. You really need a minimum of 3 megabytes, preferably 5 megabytes or more, and one of the image processors if you want to work the images to your satisfaction. You say you have an old b&w camera. Maybe it will work with digi-view, maybe not. Digi-view requies RS-170 monochrome video with 2:1 interlace. Some cameras use 'random sync' as well, and digi-view does not work with random sync. The camera should have internal sync, 2:1 interlace, to work with digi-view. Enough rambling. You probably now have more questions than when I started. 🙂 Bill, K3OZM
#18954From: Joe PastreckMay 3, 1992 8:58 PM
Bill, Thanks for the info, I had figured that I was going to be limited by my current system. A lot of the things you have talked about are far above my price range, most notably the hard drive, and the scanner. I have been looking through catalogs, and for $95 I can get an external ram board with 2 meg, it is expandable to 8 meg should I require it in the future. Do you think this is adequate? Or, do I need more than that for now? As for the retouching of gifs, I should have made myself more clear on that. I have a large collection of gif pictures that I downloaded from another BBS. They are inferior in quality to the ham pictures I downloaded from AmigaArts. A lot of them seem blurry, and others seem more like the colors are too bright. What I mainly want to do, is to be able to clean these pictures up, and make them look sharper and more detailed. Also, I have some B&W pictures that I would like to colorize. For now, I will be content just playing with these pictures. In the future I would like to start digitizing my own (I am becoming more and more interested in DCTV). Will digipaint-3 be adequate for what I want to do? Or, do I need something else in conjunction with it? Thanks for the help. Joe. via…New England
#18959From: Bill EastburnMay 4, 1992 12:47 AM
Joe, If the GIFs were blurry, chances are you can't do much with them without an image processor. Even then you might not get the results you want. GIFs vary in quality widely. Digi-paint is a paint program. You could use it to colorize pictures, or to simulate cropping. I use paint programs to remove those advertisments BBS love to paste all over the picture. 🙂 If you're a fair artist, you can play around with images, removing clothes from clad models (or putting them on nudes), etc. A better solution for you might be to check out the graphics forums here on CompuServe. The images are generally high quality, and there are lots of them. Starting out with a good GIF does make quite a bit of difference. 🙂 Two additional megs, added to your one, give you three. That should be enough to work with most images of 640×480 or less. At $95.00, I suspect you are looking at a board for the 2000 though. If you get that, you still have to buy a chassis to attach it to your 500. I haven't played with DCTV, but I understand its digitizer is similar to digi-view. It is (I think) an 18 bit system, so whatever standard paint program you get it won't work with DCTV. I am not sure what comes with the DCTV package. It may include a paint program. You would still have to add lighting, copy stand, cables, etc., and probably a new camera, to use the digitizing function. You might want to defer a decision on DCTV until you get some practice working in normal 8 bit modes. (ADPro and ImageMaster (or whatever Ben is calling it this week) should both work with DCTV images.) For the moment, a paint program and some memory should be good enough to get you going. You will probably want more very shortly, but you can work with those. The Art Department should run around $100, and would be a logical next step. (Get the GIF module with it so you can convert and process the image at the same time.) ADPro is preferable if you can swing it, but it runs around $250. (Image Master is in the same price category [ MORE ]
#18975From: Peter GreciMay 4, 1992 12:56 PM
ADpro can be had via Mail order for as low as $150 for Version 2.01
#18960From: Bill EastburnMay 4, 1992 12:47 AM
[ continuation ] as Adpro.) Bill, K3OZM
#18995From: Joe PastreckMay 4, 1992 7:54 PM
Bill, Sorry for the typo in my last message. I should have read it more carefully, the price is $195, and it is an A/500 board. I have been going through a lot of catalogs over the last few days, and I have come up with what is hopefully a good enough system to begin tinkering with, let me know what you think. First of all, is the above mentioned memory board, wich will give me 3 meg ram. A fatter agnus, wich will give me 1 meg chip ram. And a digiview media station, consisting of a copy stand with lights, a panasonic 1410 b&w camera, digi-view, digi-paint 3, and elan performer 2.0. I can assemble this for a little under $600. However, the descriptions in the ads were not very detailed on the software package. From what I could gather, elan performer is basically a slide show program. but, is digiview in the same vein as adpro or image master? Or will I still need one of those as well? Joe
#18997From: Bill EastburnMay 4, 1992 9:31 PM
Joe, Memory is memory. 🙂 $195 sounds more typical. It should do the job for you. I am not really familiar with Elan Performer. I thought it was essentially an animation program, but could be way off base. I don't think you really want an animation program from your earlier description. In any case, Digi-View comes with a slide show program, and there are loads of them in the libraries here in the forum. (I like SuperView from the libraries…. and the price is right. 🙂 ) Digi-View is a digitizer. It is an hardware interface for the camera to the Amiga and software to control the digitizing process. The software does perform some image processing functions, but an image processor gives more functions and more control over them. Digitizing is composed of several discrete steps, at least for good images. First is selection of an appropriate image to digitize. I imagine everyone can handle this one, though you should be aware that a photographic system like digi-view or DCTV may have trouble with dark images. Second is the actual digitizing procedure. In either digi-view or DCTV this is done by having the camera scan the image three times, one for each red, green and blue. The digitized image output is directly related to the focus of your camera, lighting, quality of the lens, etc. This is a photographic process, remember. The third step is processing the image to obtain best results. You can do a good bit of this with digi-view (and I imagine DCTV) software, though it is a little more difficult than a real image processor. With ADPro or IM, you save the digi-view image as a RGB file and optimize it with the image processor. (You can do it with the HAM image, but using the RGB output is better.) Cropping out external garbage from the digitization, resizing it, more precise control over image colors and brightness, etc., are things the image processor can do for you that the digi-view software cannot. You can get by with the digi-view software and a HAM paint program. [ MORE ]
#18998From: Bill EastburnMay 4, 1992 9:31 PM
[ continuation ] You do have enough image processing to turn out a reasonable picture with the digi-view software. The paint program can simulate cropping by blocking out the unwanted parts of the image with black rectangles. It is not as neat as using an image processor, but is cheaper. 🙂 Digi-paint is around $55… just a representative, I didn't look for the 'best' price. Prices I saw for ADPro and Image Professional were around $150. The Art Department was around $70. There are some older processors around, like PixMate or Butcher, which should run around $50. The older ones are not a full featured as the others, and I think The Art Department would be a better investment on the cheaper end. Bill, K3OZM
#19035From: Joe PastreckMay 5, 1992 8:23 PM
Bill, Thank you for all the info over the last couple of days. I know I don't need (or want) elan performer, but it is included in the package. As for image master vs. adpro, I stumbled on an april issue of A/W, and they had an informative article comparing the two. Based upon what I have read, I am inclined to go with adpro, only because they state that it has an easier user interface (wich is what I need at this stage). They also state that image master has a lot of features that adpro lacks, and for any really serious work, you should use the two of them in conjunction with each other. as for the bargain processors, I would rather buy a processor like adpro or image master, that way when I do become more experienced, I will have the features that I want. Joe
#19054From: Margaret CopelandMay 6, 1992 11:05 AM
If you are using your Digiview, you'll want ImageMaster as it gives you direct Digiview support. If you have enough memory you can multitask both programs. If you save your Digiview files as Digiview RGB, you can pull them into ImageMaster and there are several very valuable Digiview file massage functions that Adpro just does not have. <- not too mention everything else you can do!
#19071From: Joe PastreckMay 6, 1992 8:18 PM
Margaret, Thanks, I ordered adpro before reading your message. I am extremely inexperienced in this area, and have decided to just play around with the gif pictures I have, to gain an understanding of how things work. Im sure I will be adding image master to my collection as I progress.
#19092From: Margaret CopelandMay 7, 1992 10:55 AM
Well you could have started and stayed with Image Master. Having both is nice but Image Master really makes the difference with Digiview. Also try getting good RCA cables for the camera like Monster cables. They cost more but they give you a better signal. Also, get a good lens. I tossed the one that came with my Panasonic and put on a 35mm lens adapter. Outside of the software, this can make the greatest difference in the quality of your digitized images. A better camera would help too.
#19237From: Charles BlaquiereMay 11, 1992 9:03 PM
Joe, regardin AdPro vs. Image Master, two comments. First, IM _is_ harder to get into than ADP. Black Belt will argue that it's because it offers more functions and more choices. Second, you should download their rebuttal to the AW review. It's in section 6 of Amigavend. Welcome to the wonderful world of digitizing! You'll love it! Blaq!
#19030From: Matthew J. W. RatcliffMay 5, 1992 7:03 PM
Digiview can do some mage processing tricks, including cahnging resolutions, but it is not really a full blown image processor like adpro or imagemaster. This package would be a really good start for almost all of whatr you need.
#19031From: Matthew J. W. RatcliffMay 5, 1992 7:10 PM
Oh yeah, Digi-View uses a B&W camera and a color wheel for color images. The resolution of the B&W cameras is better than the color video required by DCTV. DCTV can take a still color video image from a good VCR, still video camera or camcorder, It digitizes in NTSC color which is like 21-22 bits (this statement usually causes arguments) Elan Performer is for stills and animation and is like a interactive slide show where each image/anim is assigned to a key. They can be auto sequenced, or selscted with a key press. It comes with little pads of paper with blank keyboards so you can remember what's where.. really cool idea but I haven't used any yet ;-/
#19061From: Joe PastreckMay 6, 1992 2:16 PM
Arnie, Thanks for the advice, it will take me awhile to get used to the more basic stuff. I have heard of adpro 2.1.0, got any info on this? Joe
#19236From: Charles BlaquiereMay 11, 1992 9:03 PM
Joe, that extra 2 Meg of memory will be the smartest purchase you ever made. For one, it'll enable you to copy all system files into a ramdisk at bootup, so you'll never see that "Please insert Workbench disk" again. This alone is worth its weight in gold. You'll also be able to use that famous Amiga multitasking to a much greater extent. And you'll have enough memory to digitize and manipulate your images. Digi-View will digitize color images one color at a time. This means you'll be using their color filter in front of your black & white camera and doing three passes. It also means you won't be able to digitize off a color video signal, like that of a paused VCR. To do that, you'll need a color splitter, which runs about $100 and does electronically what the color filters do optically. DCTV will digitize a color NTSC signal in one pass. It has a wonderful paint program. And best of all, it allows your Amiga to display full-color images with much higher quality than HAM! Think of a paused VHS VCR… now imagine such a picture coming out of your Amiga! DCTV sells for about $400; add in your memory board and you get the same $600 total, but you gain great paint software, color digitizing and full-color output. You lose out in precision (DCTV is a bit blurry; Digi-View can digitize fairly sharply) but gain a whole lot of possibilities. And if you ever get a demo of Black Belt's Imagemaster program, you'll start saving up for it. It's that simple. Blaq!