CompuServe Thread

#download troubles

16 messages in this thread
#50694From: Paul FeganJan 25, 1987 10:13 AM
Hi, I wrote last night about download troubles I am having. I called customerservice once and they told me it was local telco problems. I had my line checked by the guys in the office where I work (Bell of Pa. Harrisburg, Pa.) they said it should be fine for data transfer. I don't get any garbage at any time except while downloading. When I up/down load locally or on long distance boards around the country I haven't had any problems. I am using either Maxicomm or Starterm mostly. I have them set for 8-N-1 and I am using Xmodem protocol. Boy I wish I could get this straightened out, this is costing me a fortune and I'm not really getting anything out of it. Thanks for your concern, I realize that you, in the forum, have little control over the operations of the service in general but I hope something can be done to correct the situation. By the way, other people I have talked to in the Central Pa. area have had similar problems with CIS and have dropped the service. Not all of them call the same access number that I do either. Anyway thanks again I'll be awaiting your reply. Sincerely, Paul Fegan
#50699From: Marlene ZenkerJan 25, 1987 11:31 AM
Paul, the only thing I can suggest at this point (if you want to) is to call a CIS number outside of Central PA. try a short download and see what happens. If you have a problem then it's got to be either your CIS settings and/or your term pgm settings. BTW, don't uuse Maxicomm if you don't have to – it has lots of problems. Besides, 8-N-1 what are your EOL Send and Receive parms set to in Starterm? Marlene
#50722From: Steve AhlstromJan 25, 1987 12:25 PM
The only way we can help is if you give us the number you are dialing and the node id number that is giving you trouble. To get the node id number log on with a carriage return instead of a ^C then type CIS at the prompt. With that info we can forward it to network services for them to check both the line and the modem on the particular port for problems.
#51035From: Paul FeganJan 26, 1987 11:02 PM
Hi, I checked last night and it said I was on node To1hap. I hope thats what you need. Thanks for your interest. All in all I think I better try some other Terminal programs too, though I haven't had much luck with any of the other PD stuff. And I really haven't seen any commercial programs that really impressed me either. Let me know if you come across any problems with the network. I've got some people looking at the trunks in Harrisburg for me. I work for Bell of Pa. I'll be looking forward to hearing from you.
#50736From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJan 25, 1987 1:35 PM
Paul, I see other replies to your message…so this may be a repeat…but a MAJOR problem with what you are doing is using MaxiComm….it has it's timing parameters set too tight for use with a packet switched network like CIS and will bomb almost every time. If you get no garbage during normal connect, and only during transfers, the problem is not the phone lines, it is the terminal program. Make sure you are using a later version of StarTerm as the early versions had problems similar to MaxiComm. We have the latest version here in the DL's as STERM.ARC….I realize this creates a Catch 22 type problem….but if you attempt to do the download very late at night (after midnight Eastern time) it should go successfully. Try it on small short files first, so you don't waste any money trying a larger file. Don
#50759From: Kelly JordanJan 25, 1987 3:19 PM
Don, I never had any problems with using Starterm V2 to download from CIS. Though it may be that I mostly did my downloading on weekend mornings when most of you guys are sleeping 8). It must have taken me three months to figure out that I had to have V3.01 set to relaxed timing before I could get it to download anything!! I kept going back to V2 to download anything. Now if only V3.01 would recover from a received error condition. Hopefully the next version will have this fixed. (along with its many other problems) 73, Kelly
#50816From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJan 25, 1987 9:34 PM
Kelly, Humm….I've never had problems with uploading with the 3.01 version, but lately have been trying a beta test version of the next step (now called NovaComm) and it does have a few problems uploading…but then this is a test version. Don
#50848From: Kelly JordanJan 25, 1987 11:19 PM
Don, The problem with uploading is not with StarTerm 3.01, but appears to be beyond my modem!! I mean datapac, or something else down the line. I tried a couple term programs on here, and have even tried my SeXy-64, but don't seem to get anywhere. I will have to wait and see what iNet has to say about the matter. I have a couple of printer drivers for the Star Micronics SR-10/15 printers to upload. 73, Kelly
#50870From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJan 26, 1987 12:27 AM
Kelly, Have you read the file DATAPA.TXT in DL 1? It contains information on setting your DataPac parameters so you can do up/downloading. Don
#50931From: Kelly JordanJan 26, 1987 10:26 AM
Don, I have no problems downloading (yes I do the stuff the DATAPA.TXT says), just uploading! I will have to wait and see what iNet has to say about it. 73, Kelly
#50748From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJan 25, 1987 2:24 PM
Paul, After I left the last message to you, I thought a full explanation of what is going on may be in order. The was CIS and the other network services work is that "packets" of data are sent from CIS to your node. These packets of data can contain data for not only you, but other users connected to the same node as well. The frequency that the packets are sent to your node (how often a packet is sent) depends on several things such as how much data is waiting to go there, system usage (how may folks are on CIS in it's entirety) and how much data is waiting to go to other nodes. In other words, all the data doesn't come in a steady stream, although it may appear to on your screen. When you connect to a BBS, even a long distance BBS, there is no such packet switching…you have full use of that BBS, so the data comes to you in a steady stream. Xmodem timing requires that the data bits be received within a specific amount of time. On a BBS, this is no problem, but on CIS (or other services) it can be a problem. The answer to this is to relax the timing specifications for how much time the terminal program will wait for a character to be received during an Xmodem transfer. MaxiComm in particular does not relax the timing near enough for it to work with network services, althou it seems to work fine with a BBS. As a result, while normal communications with MaxiComm and CIS look fine (since there is no timing involved), Xmodem transfers fail almost every time. StarTerm, in it's early versions (ver 2.0 and earlier) had similar problems..it's timing was relaxed, but not enough for use during busy times. It also has a setting for STANDARD and RELAXED Xmodem transfers. Use the RELAXED setting and do the transfer late at night and it should work. Again…the problem is NOT in the phone lines, or CIS modems, etc. the problem is the software used not having "loose" enough timing parameters. Does that make a little more sense now? Don
#50758From: Kelly JordanJan 25, 1987 3:19 PM
Paul, If you are using Starterm V3.01, be sure to set the timing parameter (right most menu) to relaxed instead of standard. And CRC instead of Checksum. And then when you pick the menu item to download, pick Binary receive. That is all I can think of. I used V2 of Starterm, and never ran into any of the timing problems. It took me a long time to figure out with V3.01 that I was supposed to have it set to relaxed timing to get thru all this datapac (AND MOSTLY CIS) delays. The only problem with V3.01 of Starterm on doing XMODEM transfers is that it can't recover from an error if you get one on receive. My only real problem (other then it being so SLOW half the time), is I can't upload!! No problems downloading. 73, Kelly
#50862From: Steve AhlstromJan 26, 1987 12:04 AM
By using DataPac the slowness is not on the CIS end. DataPac connects to TymNet (or TeleNet — I forget which) which then connects to CIS. So, by going thru 2 different supplemental services things tend to get bogged down.
#50874From: John DraperJan 26, 1987 12:47 AM
Absolutely right Steve. When we were forced to go through Datapac/Telenet before they restored our local node, it was irritating in the extreme to press a CTRL O to cancel a message and then have to sit through all the packets that were already in the net on the way to me. Regards, Larry.
#50932From: Kelly JordanJan 26, 1987 10:27 AM
Steve, Then I still consider it a CIS problem. They should have a direct port to Datapac. This would result in higher throughput by not having to go through telenet, and will also result in lower costs for Canadians to access CIS. I got that one comment (not in them words) from iNet themselves when I was asking them if they could interface to a direct CIS node in Toronto instead of having to got thru datapac then telenet. They said there were too much incompatibilities between the CIS node and datapac, but the whole problem could be simplified if CIS would put in a direct datapac connection. So, no matter what you say, the problem is still CIS, if not one way, then another. And I still say that CIS is way too slow in the evening hours (after 7PM eastern time). It is going to take an awful lot to convince me otherwise. These are the only real problems I hold against CIS. (though 1200 bps access rates could be lowered to 300 bps! 8) ) 73, Kelly
#51039From: Paul FeganJan 26, 1987 11:08 PM
Hi Kelly, I've got a few questions for you. 1. why can't you upload with Starterm? I do quite a bit of uploading the stuff I download to the boards in the area. Also do you know if you can download a file with Xmodem that has been uploaded to CIS with Bprotocol and vice versa. Thanks for the help. Paul Fegan