CompuServe Thread

#New Monitor Drivers!

21 messages in this thread
#98692From: Paul IdolMay 7, 1993 6:13 PM
I got the new monitor drivers in the mail today from that guy in Salt Lake City! _INCREDIBLE_ is all I can say. DoubleNTSC now goes to 720×455, NTSC (which I can't really use, sniff, since my monitor doesn't support it) goes to 724×241, and _MULTISCAN_ now supports overscan, going up to 656×481. True, the overscan on the multiscan modes isn't enormous, but it's a start. And what's more interesting is that there's a new multiscan mode – 640×240, at 58Hz and 29.29kHz. Is that wierd or what? Furthermore, there's a new "Super72" mode – Euro72 Productivity – that offers a maximum resolution of 656×401 non-laced or 640×802 laced at 69Hz and 29.32kHz. The Super72 800×600 modes go up to 912×614, though I don't know what they did before because they did and still do use the _idiotic_ horizontal scan rate of 23.21kHz. And then there're the Euro36 and DoublePAL modes which I never used and won't now but which have undoubtedly changed. I'd be happy to upload the update – I just don't know whether it's against forum policy or something. Could someone tell me? (I have a feeling plenty of people will.) So there's the scoop, right from the horse's mouth. Or at least from the mouth of one of his close relatives. Well, kind of close. Paul
#98700From: Steve AhlstromMay 7, 1993 6:32 PM
I checked with CATS specifically on this — any monitor drivers that did not ship with the version of 3.0 that came with the 1200 or 4000 are beta test versions and not for distribution. Anyone caught distributing them can expect to be hearing from CBM's legal department. For further information contact CATS at 215-431-9100.
#98710From: Paul IdolMay 7, 1993 7:03 PM
Ah, I see. Oh well. They're still very nice, even if I "don't" have them. Rats. Any idea when 3.1 is coming out? Paul
#98732From: Jim SteeleMay 7, 1993 10:16 PM
Thats interesting… the updated monitor drivers I have came *from* CBM. I still have the disk down at the store in the CBM mailer. Perhaps the support person at CBM didn't have authority to release them? It wouldn't be the first time that one part of an organization didn't know what the other was doing.
#98736From: Steve AhlstromMay 7, 1993 10:47 PM
Many times the support people don't have the authority to do what they do — they're being "good guys" and it's very commendable, but their jobs are on the line if they get caught. The problem with beta material being distributed is that there is no guarantee that it'll work as expected. If the user doesn't know he's using an untested program, and it messes up his system, causes gurus, or whatever, CBM gets blamed for shoddy system software. It's neither fair to CBM or to the user.
#98766From: Jonathan BlackwellMay 8, 1993 2:46 AM
The new drivers were just recently released to dealers.
#98771From: Steve AhlstromMay 8, 1993 3:11 AM
According to my conversation with CATS this afternoon that is not the case (or at least not for public distribution). As Denny said, the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. Since CATS is the originator of those drivers and they are part of the beta 3.1 distribution, I'm going to go with what they told me.
#98785From: Dale LarsonMay 8, 1993 5:34 AM
CATS doesn't provide end-user support but support to developers. Engineering could concievably release something to the end-user support channels without CATS knowing it. I believe that is the case with these drivers.
#98826From: Steve AhlstromMay 8, 1993 11:34 AM
That could very well be — it was just that the denial was so strongly stated. Guess I'll call them again on Monday.
#98884From: Mark D. ManesMay 8, 1993 5:16 PM
I am a direct Commodore dealer, and they have *not* released to us any new drivers.
#99119From: Dale LarsonMay 10, 1993 1:53 PM
This is from Spencer Shanson, the programmer at Commodore who actually writes the monitor drivers (my question is quoted by him): > Apparently many dealers have a disk with newer monitor files. There are > arguments on CIS about its legitimacy. Someone called CATS (who might > well not know what has been given to dealers) and was told that no way > has anything at all been released to anyone other than developers. I > figured you would have the definative scoop. ..this disk is probably the 1942 upgrade. The 1942 is our new low-cost 1960 replacement monitor; to take advantage of it, we sent out a monitor update disk which contains the latest Beta monitors (and iprefs) for better picture centering. That's it. Strictly speaking, it should only be distributed to buyers of 1942s. If it's not the 1942 update disk, then CATS are correct.
#99222From: Mark D. ManesMay 11, 1993 12:07 AM
I appreciate the extra information on this. However, the Commodore 1942 monitor has not been released in the United States-yet.
#98850From: Jonathan BlackwellMay 8, 1993 1:58 PM
Denny is probably right on the right knowing what the left hand is doing. It may not supposed to be distributed, but many of the dealers I know or have heard of are giving customers the newer video drivers.
#98735From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiMay 7, 1993 10:32 PM
And once again the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing… Commodre did release a driver update disk to dealers. Also, new systems are shipping with newer monitor drivers, and there's nothing illegal about getting a copy of those from your dealer. However, I'm quite sure thatit's possible that CATS doesn't know about this.
#98737From: Steve AhlstromMay 7, 1993 10:51 PM
The software originates from CATS — they know what they've released and what they haven't. You might give them a call (I did) — the man with the definitive answer is John Campbell. There is disk that's being distributed via bbses and other networks — ParBench. It was put together by a CBM sales rep (I was told today that he's no longer with the company). It is a distribution disk in .DMS format. It contains most of the files from a 1.3.2 Workbench disk. Electronic distribution of these files are forbidden. You're right, the left hand may not know what the right hand is doing — but in this case, I believe you've been talking to the wrong "hand". Call CBM for confirmation.
#98804From: Sean LallyMay 8, 1993 9:20 AM
Paul, Those monitor drivers came with the 2.1 upgrade that I recieved the other day. Didn't everyone get them? -Sean
#98822From: Paul IdolMay 8, 1993 11:08 AM
Hmm… Maybe they're shipping w/ the 2.1 upgrade, but I didn't get them with 3.0 – and a lot of the enhancements are AGA only. C= has to get on the ball here. This is ridiculous. Paul
#98841From: Sean LallyMay 8, 1993 1:26 PM
Paul, I think you're right about C= getting on the ball. They even mentioned datatypes in the manual and then went on to say that they were only for use with 3.0. What's up with that? I don't think it was written to be a common manual between the two OS's. -Sean
#98872From: Paul IdolMay 8, 1993 4:01 PM
That's strange. Of course, my "unprofessional" 1200 didn't even come with ARexx and AmigaDOS docs. Paul
#98952From: Sean LallyMay 9, 1993 11:45 AM
Paul, Maybe C= is trying to eek a few dollars more out of all the 1200 purchasers. "Send us $25 with your proof of purchase (of course) and we'll send you the new drivers." -Commodore (Lurkers, they didn't really say that.) -Sean
#99024From: Brian CowanMay 9, 1993 11:52 PM
Neither did mine, but a quick call to C= Express fixed that… // Brian — Cruising on AutoPilot….. \X/