CompuServe Thread

#ADPro still Broken

16 messages in this thread
#56059From: Paul ToalApr 30, 1993 1:22 AM
Is it still true that Sentry will not work with Lightwave? Will this ever be fixed? –Paul < Motorola Inside >
#56075From: ASDGApr 30, 1993 9:30 AM
We are looking into this problem. Lightwave opens and closes its files multiple times while writing and this is fooling Sentry. Sentry is doing exactly what it was designed to do. Process complete files as they show up and DOS considers a file complete when the file gets closed. Lightwave is causing this problem by not handling file i/o in a standard manner. If this behaviour is going to continue in Lightwave then Sentry will have to be fudged to handle the special case. This is what is being considered. -Russ
#56167From: Joe MaulucciMay 1, 1993 11:38 PM
I wonder how REND-24 (shareware) handles this? I believe it does wait for the IFF (not FrameStore) to be rendered and then does its thing. It will even delete the IFF after it adds it finished using it, to handle space limits. (Wondering if there is a difference on how LW creates IFFs and FS? Could one make an ARexx script that would wait for a given amount of time, then copy the LW image destination to the place were Sentry is waiting?) Joe Maulucci >>> AP ENGAGED
#56543From: Scott HornMay 7, 1993 10:40 AM
Sentry doesn't work with lightwave? Somebody must have forgotten to tell MY copy of Sentry that! Just last night I used Sentry and AdPro to create an anim from lightwave IFF files as they were being rendered, worked just fine. I was using Low Res mode, which I think writes the IFF file all at once. Maybe thats why it worked?
#56622From: Joe MaulucciMay 8, 1993 9:19 PM
Scott, I have yet to play with Sentry… If you say it work fine with LW/IFFs then perhaps the problem is with LW/FSs! See if framestores are the problem. I would not think that resolution would do it. But as I said, Rend 24 only uses IFFs so let us know what you find out. Thanks, Joe Maulucci >>> Accadia Electronic Arts DTV/DTP – Amiga Style!
#56829From: Paul ToalMay 11, 1993 9:31 PM
Super lores works because it writes the file in one shabang. Chokes on FrameStores too. –Paul < Motorola Inside >
#56189From: Paul ToalMay 2, 1993 5:49 AM
Thanks for filling me in Russ. What if I added a script that waited for the second file to show up and then load the first file? If we see the file Pic002 then we know for sure that Pic001 is done, right? I'm not quite sure how to this, any Arexx wizards have a coding clue? –Paul < Motorola Inside >
#56198From: Robert WilcoxMay 2, 1993 11:06 AM
If you are sure you know what the file name is going to be, you tell ARexx to open it and loop (with a delay) until the return code indicates success. Then you access the previous file in the series. There is the problem of the possibility of the prior file not being successfully created so you may want to activate the BREAK_C trap. Since the file you are testing in the loop should not exist right away – say file image002, the loop continues because Open fails until the host is finished processing image001.
#56126From: Nathan WahlMay 1, 1993 9:54 AM
Paul, For what it's worth, LW1.0 used to leave the files open until the frame was finished, then close 'em. That was bad, 'cause if you didn't let it finish, it was difficult to get rid of the partial file. If you've still got it around, it might be better with Sentry. Probably not worth the effort. It should work with lo-res and super-lo-res, as they are written with one whack, but you can't do everything pixelized. ;^) Gotta big drive? The scripts work OK on a batch of files that are already done (Hey, you gotta sleep sometime!!!). … Nate, Emerald Video. Flyin' IFR on AP
#56190From: Paul ToalMay 2, 1993 5:49 AM
Got a big drive? Hmmmmm…. I thought I was being nuts buying a 426 meg drive. I only needed 80 megs. Guess what? All but 12 megs are full. How can this happen? –Paul < Motorola Inside >
#56245From: Nathan WahlMay 3, 1993 5:58 AM
Paul, Maybe you should throw away some stuff, huh? I'm a packrat, too, but wow. What IS all that stuff???? Happy rendering! … Nate, Emerald Video. Flyin' IFR on AP
#56304From: Jonathan HirschmanMay 3, 1993 10:30 PM
Paul, Guess you put that Seagate to good use! Personally, mine is only half full right now, but I have a Quantum 240 and a SyQuest 44 to back it up 🙂 Isn't having gobs of storage grand? //Jonathan, \\//via AutoPilot
#56331From: Paul ToalMay 4, 1993 5:46 AM
It is indeed. I like to keep things around "just in case". I have 84 versions of a camcorder I did in Lightwave, and 134 versions of texture maps for the buttons, and 37 versions of the animation, and 1,888 versions of… 🙂 My history file for Autopilot is, get this, 104 MEGS! I might do a prune soon. Yes- Having gobs of storage is indeed grand. (I also got a 220 meg Conner :). Have you seen the new Tahiti 1 gigabyte removable cartridges 🙂 –Paul < Motorola Inside >
#56408From: Jonathan BlackwellMay 5, 1993 1:47 AM
Paul, I have seen the Tahiti mechanism. Actually it is a Maxoptics mechanism which is a subsidiary of Maxtor. BTW, I am selling Tahiti carteidges. For you or anyone else interested, they are selling for HALF price! -Jonathan
#56452From: Jonathan HirschmanMay 5, 1993 10:49 PM
Paul, Have not seen the new Tahitis, but you can bet I'd love to have one. Pretty much infinite storage. Next aquisition might be a new 3.5" Syquest, or maybe a 150 MB Bernoulli. I hear that the SyQuest is rather fast for removeable media… //Jonathan, \\//via AutoPilot
#56524From: Paul ToalMay 7, 1993 5:29 AM
Yeah, but the Bernoulli is bullet proof and cheaper. Tough call, huh? Let me know what you find poking around in the other forums. The SCSI version just got released this week. –Paul < Motorola Inside >