CompuServe Thread

Mitsumi and SCSI/OS2 ?

6 messages in this thread
#48932From: Robin CollinsMay 21, 1993 3:50 PM
Jochen, I haven't bothered with MS-DOS 6 so can't say whether there are any problems with the LU005S and that version of DOS, but I can't see any reason for there being any as long as you use the MSCDEX which shipped with DOS 6. As for OS/2, currently there are no _released_ drivers, but there are at least two drivers in beta test being written by non-Mitsumi people, and someone mentioned a while back that Mitsumi themselves are doing one. One of these beta drivers is in LIB 4 here, currently you'll need to get hold of OS2_LU.EXE, the original upload, and UPDAT4.ZIP, the latest update. From limited use this works well, supports audio and supposedly single-session photoCD (I don't have any such CDs to try). Note that the early versions were date crippled to expire on 31 May. Although un-announced, update 4 still works with the date set to June 1, and from examination of a disassembly the original location of the crippling code shows no sign. IOW, either the author saw the light and removed it, or else he realised how easy it was to crack and moved it <g>. Finally, the Mitumi comes with a proprietary 16-bit interface card, it is NOT SCSI and so doesn't work with the Adeptec controllers you mention (which is why neither OS/2 not Windows NT support it 'out of the box'). Hope this is helpful to you. Robin PS, in case my mention of cracking the cripple concerns anyone, I would point out I sent my order in for this a couple of weeks ago! <g>.
#49002From: Jochen BaumgaertelMay 22, 1993 7:21 PM
Robin, thanks for responding. I think there's a big problem with unofficial drivers, 'cause you can't be sure to get one for further releases of your OS. So I think, I'll ask my purse if it's willing to pay for an (expensive) SCSI-CDROM (Toshiba/Nec) ;-). Jochen
#49011From: Robin CollinsMay 23, 1993 4:57 AM
Jochen, I got the Mitsumi sort of free, though it's none the worse for that, but I've come to the conclusion that as a developer I need something which the 'big boys' support. Right now I reckon the Tosh. 3401 is _the_ drive, though my purse must be in the same union as yours 'cos it's not too keen on forking out for one either :). Robin
#49111From: Jochen BaumgaertelMay 24, 1993 6:25 PM
Robin, after a long fight against my purse, I won <g>. So I decided to buy a SCSI-drive, even if it's more expensive. But I think I will have a lot less trouble using it with newer/other OS's like OS/2, NT and UNIX. I'll have a closer look on the Toshiba, NEC and the TEXEL. Jochen
#49184From: Robin CollinsMay 25, 1993 2:05 PM
Jochen, >after a long fight against my purse, I won <g> <g>. I'm currently having my motherboard swapped for a VL-bus one and am trying to pursuade the dealer that giving a good trade-in price on my redundant cache controller and motherboard against a 3401/1522 is a good deal for him <g> (he does quite see it that way just yet, but I'm working on him). It seems to me from a large number of messages I've seen that the 3401 is really _the_ drive at present. I like the fact that OS/2 and NT support it out-of-the-box. Robin
#49003From: Jim BriscoeMay 22, 1993 7:37 PM
Robin, I am running MSDOS6 with the LU005S and have experienced no problems what so ever. Also, I am using the MSCDEX that came with MSDOS 6. 🙂 JimB