CompuServe Thread

#Picasso RTG Board

22 messages in this thread
#101656From: Ed HoffmannMay 27, 1993 11:15 AM
Our user group, Ohio Valley Amiga USers Group (OVAUG), demo'd the Picasso board at our last meeting (5/25). This board is incredible (I am sure those DevCon know this, but I am not one of those lucky folks). It is a true RTG board, doing 24 bit at 640×480 (with overscan), going up to 1240×1024 (?) at 256 color. And fast. Several times faster than an A4000. On board blitter, etc. The Agnus/Alice chips just sort of idle, since the board does not merely copy from chip ram, it patches into the Intuition calls and redirects to the board. No chip ram usage, and a faster machine since the cpu never waits for the display. And AGA compatibility for properly-written 2.0+ applications (i.e., opens up as a monitor selection). Who says the 2000/3000 are AGA-dead? I hear availability in 1-1/2 months (FCC, manuals, translation from German, etc) at a MSRP of $599 for the 1MB version (2MB to come – field-upgradable).
#101730From: Jonathan HirschmanMay 27, 1993 10:36 PM
Ed, Does Picasso animate well? //Jonathan, \\//via AutoPilot
#101805From: Ed HoffmannMay 28, 1993 7:05 AM
From what I have seen, the 2MB version will allow buffered screens for animation – I haven't seen animations on it yet, but based on the specs it should move data real fast, so I expect good animation capabilities I will upload Picas.lha which contains some specs on the board.
#101813From: Jonathan HirschmanMay 28, 1993 10:38 AM
Ed, Thanks for the information. I have a feeling that I'm going to regret my choice of an OpalVision…:) Jonathan
#101837From: Richard BeausangMay 28, 1993 1:51 PM
Jonathan, I've seen you remark several times about possibly regretting the OpalVision. Are you actually using this card? It's an outstanding product and will have many capabilities that are not part of these other cards. The paint program is dynamite with lots of image processing tools, eg. magic wand, etc. All in all an outstanding deal for the show price you got it for. It doesn't quite animate as well as I had hoped, but that may even be fixed in the future. Also, don't forget that you can still use the Retina with the Opal card. Don't know about the Picasso. -Richard
#102060From: Jonathan HirschmanMay 30, 1993 2:05 AM
Richard, The Picasso seems very impressive; it very well might do more for me than the Opal. Not to say that I don't like the Opal…I might just like one of the newer alternatives a bit more 🙂 //Jonathan, \\//via AutoPilot
#102082From: donnellanMay 30, 1993 10:48 AM
Jonathan, Before you go for the PICASSO take a look at the MERLIN. It's about the same price and has MUCH more to offer! I'll go for the MERLIN as soon as I have the cash on hand. I'm just waiting for a 20" or 21" multisync to come my way… (or at least a 19")! Sean.
#102166From: Jonathan HirschmanMay 30, 1993 8:43 PM
Sean, What's so great about Merlin? //Jonathan, \\//via AutoPilot
#101852From: Jonathan BlackwellMay 28, 1993 4:42 PM
Jonathan- I bought my own Emplant and got it working in about 5 minutes. It is great! Now I'm gonna have to get a Retina board to use the 24bit capability now provided by UU for the Emplant! -Jonathan
#101919From: Paul ToalMay 29, 1993 6:57 AM
Jonathan- Could you expound on the connection between the Emplant and 24bit IFF? Retina24 is an incredible board. Is there a possibility that the Picasso may eclipse it? Will you wait, or jump? Have you watched the action on the NET over Retina? Very positive. What monitor will you use? –Paul < Motorola Inside >
#102120From: Jonathan BlackwellMay 30, 1993 5:53 PM
I am considering a Retina board for two reasons. 1) It has had great reviews on the nets from end-users as you have said. and 2) It has direct support under Emplant emulation. -Jonathan
#102061From: Jonathan HirschmanMay 30, 1993 2:05 AM
Jonathan, Glad to hear that you had good luck with your Emplant! Wish I could connect to the BBS to get the newer software, and to see if I can finally get mine running. Are you using HD floppies, or Sybil, or no floppies at all? //Jonathan, \\//via AutoPilot
#102133From: Jonathan BlackwellMay 30, 1993 5:54 PM
I am currently using version 2.8 of the Emplant software. It is posted regularly on Genie. They do support on that network as well. I am sure if CIS gave them a sponsored (free) account, they would provide service here as well. I do not have an HD floppy (YET). I am running off of the 7.01 AMAX partition that I have had for a while. I have accessPC running on this system and my MAC at work. I just make a MAC/PC disk and transfer stuff that way. I also have a tape backup and Syquest drive in which I bring media back and forth from work with. When I get an HD floppy, I will be able to run MAC Hi-caps. The new converter software by the way lets you use the sybil without messing with the pots. Software is getting better by the day. By the way, they have introduced the Retina 8 and 24 bit drivers and are nearing completion of the EGS, Domino, Merlin, IV24 and one other (name escapes me). They have put OpalVision on indefinate hold due to the fact that Centaur refuses to give them technical documentation on the board. On Genie, they gave several names at Centaur of who to contact. Anyone with an OpalVision and planning on getting an Emplant, call Centaur first to make sure they are going to provide UU with the technical specs. -Jonathan
#101940From: Chris N.JulsonMay 29, 1993 12:06 PM
Jonathan, I just picked up on this thread. What is this Picasso bd? And what is it's major advantage over OVsn? Thanks…. Chris
#101958From: Black Belt SystemsMay 29, 1993 12:53 PM
I have a feeling you're not (going to regret your choice of an OpalVision) :^) –Ben …via AutoPilot
#102059From: Jonathan HirschmanMay 30, 1993 2:05 AM
Ben, Not another "I know something you don't" comment! //Jonathan, \\//via AutoPilot
#102199From: Black Belt SystemsMay 31, 1993 12:22 AM
Mmmmm…. no, not exactly. But I do think the OpalVision is likely to get the lion's share of support – Centaur has been nothing short of excellent in their work with us; and we've completed what is very likely the most complex application created outside Centaur as a result… that says to me that others who want to use the board will also get good support. I also know those things sell quite well, and are very system-compatible; more so than most other boards. If video res 24-bit is sufficient, then OpalVision is an excellent deal. Oh yeah – I also have a *very* high level of confidence in the designer of the OpalVision, and expect that the promised hardware upgrades will meet the expectations that have been raised for them. I've seen quite a few other high-rez boards go by the wayside in the past few years. –Ben …via AutoPilot
#102281From: Jonathan HirschmanMay 31, 1993 3:56 PM
Ben, Kind of the way that I feel about the Opal folks, too…although the non-genlock boards, which patch or "intercept" Intuition seem to be getting pretty good reviews. (Incidentally, has anyone considered that RTG has been delayed to avoid dilution of AGA sales? Hmmm…) One sour note, tho. Jonathan Blackwell has reported that Utilities Unlimited is *not* getting good support from Centaur. I find this kind of hard to believe, especially considering the ultimate source this report is coming from (meaning UU, not Jonathan). At any rate, I hope that a 4000 appears in my future. Right now, I see AGA as the hottest video hardware…anything else is an approximation in some way or another. //Jonathan, \\//via AutoPilot
#102439From: Black Belt SystemsJun 1, 1993 4:02 PM
Jonathan… As far as support goes, all you have to do is call the centaur BBS and D/l the support files. You don't have to ever even speak to them. So whatever the problem is, it's NOT Centaur. –Ben …via AutoPilot
#102451From: Jonathan HirschmanJun 1, 1993 5:38 PM
Ben, I kind of figured something like that…my opinion of UU is not terribly high right now! Even more distressing is how terribly their BBS works, and that is *their* main line of support. //Jonathan, \\//via AutoPilot
#102642From: Jonathan BlackwellJun 2, 1993 8:50 PM
That's interesting Jonathan, I have not had any problems connecting to UU's BBS. Actually, they do support on Genie and Portal. If someone gave them a free account here on CIS, I am sure they would support the product here as well. They always post the latest updates on Genie, etc… without putting out an ad for Genie, UU has given me great support – on Genie. -Jonathan
#101909From: Wayne ColeMay 29, 1993 1:30 AM
No, actually his stuff looked kinda blocky, ya know, he operated with antialiasing truned off… ;^} wmc – via Autopilot!