CompuServe Thread

#Bad Mitsumi Drives

9 messages in this thread
#49426From: MikeMay 28, 1993 8:36 PM
Well, now I know why my drive won't work with the OS/2 driver. Grabbed this off a forum today. My drive fits the following description exactly. Now I hope I can get CompUSA to give me credit on the drive for an NEC instead. I wish I would have forked over the extra bucks for a better drive in the first place. You get what you pay for, eh? >Subject: Mitsumi Warning From The Net > >There have been many reports on Prodigy and Internet that Mitsumi drives >manufactured after March 1993 do not work under OS/2. > >(with either the German driver or Joe's driver) > >The following was recently posted, so if you are in the market make sure >you have a friendly dealer that will take the drive back. > ==================================== >Subject: Mitsumi problems explained >From: benezra_a@spcvxb.spc.edu >Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.apps >Message-ID: <1993May25.232842.6073@spcvxb.spc.edu> >Date: 25 May 93 23:28:42 EDT >Organization: St. Peter's College, US > >I just received this e-mail tonite. Very sad quality control IMO. >Alan > >Hi > >Well I managed to contact Mitsumi and got transferred to their >Engineering Manager. He never talks to the public and was surprised >when I got transferred to him. He had an interesting tale to tell. It >seems in a later shipment of the LU005S drives Mitsumi replaced an ASIC >on the drive electronics and the drives should have been labelled 004, >not 005. What's special about this ASIC? Well the 004 drive does not >support PhotoCD and from extrapolation, OS/2. Mitsumi told their >distributors about this but not many told their retailers I guess. He >is also going to call Joe Cossette and talk to him about this. > >Anyway how can you tell if you have a 004 drive. Well if it doesn't work >with OS/2 that's one clue. If it was manufactured in March 93 (and >possibly later) that's another. The clincher is if the serial number >starts with a D then it certainly is a 004 drive. My retailer is going >to take the drive back and talk to his distributor. If you can find a B >serial number it will be fine. > >Hope that clears things up. > >Gary D. Archer Well, it certainly cleared things up for me. Now where's that darn CD-ROM purchase receipt… Mike…
#49429From: MikeMay 28, 1993 8:37 PM
Sorry, don't know why the text in my append got so garbled. Looked fine when I TYPE'd it…
#49462From: Mike SchoenbornMay 29, 1993 12:40 PM
> Sorry, don't know why the text in my append got so garbled. Looked fine when > I TYPE'd it… By default, CIS "word wraps" a forum message (I believe the intent is to support folks with screen widths other than 80 characters) . When you're finished typing, just tell CIS to store the message as "UNFormated".
#49716From: Torsten DrosteJun 2, 1993 1:31 PM
Hi Mike, this message is not completly correct so far. The drives you are referring to are manufactured in March and April and our driver reports M06! These drives SUPPORT Photo-CD and we are working on a OS/2 support also. Bye, Torsten
#49739From: MikeJun 2, 1993 6:13 PM
I was simply passing along what I had read. I tried your latest update (#4) with the new testdrv.exe. Testdrv.exe reported my drive as M06 just as you said. But, when the new .ADD driver initializes, it reports M-?-. Don't know what I could be doing wrong. Apparenlty my drive wants to work. (As evidenced by the testdrv results). But it just refuses to work with the driver. I've read elsewhere that the placement of the BASEDEV statements may ha something to do with it. I'll try moving them around. I'll post another message if I'm successful. Thanks, Mike
#50038From: Torsten DrosteJun 7, 1993 5:18 AM
Hi Mike, the problem with the M06 appears due a timing change. As TESTDRV.EXE uses many delays it seems to work this way. I think there's nothing you could do to solve this problem. Bye, Torsten
#50000From: Bryan S CaduganJun 6, 1993 3:18 PM
Hello, I have a question, I have a mitsumi and am now worried that it is one of these bad drives, I bought it in March, but, I have used it with photoCD successfully. How can I find out without ripping my computer apart? Thank YOu in advance Bryan
#50005From: Stephane TzarowskyJun 6, 1993 5:34 PM
I share your fear. I saw in the library a program named testdrv.exe, as a part of a third party os/2 driver designer, but it dont works under DOS. If it was possible to get a copy of this program for DOS, i am shure that its would be great for most of mitsumi's users. Friendly Greatings from Paris Stephane
#50011From: MikeJun 6, 1993 6:46 PM
The only way to be certain is to remove the drive and look at the serial number. If its starts with a 'D' and was manufactured in March (or April) then its one of the drives mentioned in the Internet message on bad Mitsumi's I have read several messages on this forum that state the drive will work with PhotoCD if you have the 2.1b version of the DOS drivers. If you don't care about running OS/2, and PhotoCD is working for you, then I don't think I would worry about whether the drive is the 004 or 005 model. Mike…