CompuServe Thread

#Vibrant Drivers

19 messages in this thread
#100770From: Yost GroupMay 9, 1994 10:23 PM
Check this out… Jamie Clay couldn't get his Viper PCI to work, and he was using the most-current vib3ds.vlm (from up here in the forum). My Viper PCI was working fine with the last version of the .vlm (1.0.1) and when I sent it to him, it worked fine on his system. I'm sure Chuck will be able to figure this out soon. – G
#100796From: John TissavaryMay 10, 1994 1:09 AM
Man, this is so typical of Viper – dismal inconsistency. I got so sick of their stuff I won't buy another peice of hardware from them as long as I live. Reminds me of somebody I know… <g> John Tissavary (LUNA cie)
#100901From: Gus GrubbaMay 10, 1994 1:06 PM
I heard that! 🙂
#100960From: John TissavaryMay 10, 1994 8:33 PM
Gus… you ARE here! Thought you'd dropped off the end of the earth (that's Portland, right?) or drowned in the Oregon rain <g>. John Tissavary (LUNA cie)
#100967From: Gus GrubbaMay 10, 1994 9:01 PM
Actually we've had a couple of nice days (for a change). I've been totally submersed in several projects: selling a house, buying another, packing up, installing a new network, replacing OS'es in 3 machines, read about 20 books in the past couple of weeks (all unix, of course), puf, puf… Ever heard from Paul? I got the quote on the biff'ed up Indi and I will get one. Haven't a clue what I'm going to do with it, but… who said I ever knew what to do with computers? It reminds me the first Apple I bought in 79. I had no clue what I could use that thing for.
#100981From: John TissavaryMay 10, 1994 10:23 PM
I'll be talking to Paul sometime this week, let me know if you want me to forward a message. He's easiest to reach via e-mail – he answers most of the time. John Tissavary (LUNA cie)
#101171From: Gus GrubbaMay 11, 1994 5:29 PM
I gave up.
#100847From: Noah KennedyMay 10, 1994 9:48 AM
Hmm….. Either a job for Chuck or M. Poirot! <g> I'm afraid I'm just not that curious. Mine's working- wake me when it's fixed, Chuck. Re: Diamond Viper, I was disappointed when I dialed Viewpoint to find that their CD-ROM program just doesn't work with a Viper. Had to retrieve my Texel 1X CD-ROM just to offload some files. We were also disappointed with the old Stealths. I'm nervous that our two new Pentiums are coming with the Stealth 64's. I really liked the Speedstars, but I haven't been impressed with their cards since then. –Noah
#100984From: Kenny DubuissonMay 10, 1994 10:30 PM
I just received an ATI Graphics WINTURBO mach64 PCI video card (the 2MB version.) It is supposed to be about 60% faster than our VIPER PCI card. I can't wait to try it, but is is not supported by 3DS right now. I talked to Vibrant Graphics' project manager for 3DS drivers and he said that they have it working in-house but don't expect to release it for about 2 weeks. It did comfort me to learn that they are not only writing the 3DS r3 drivers, but all of the video drivers for this card. The newness of the card scares me a little. It came with a manual that was run on a copy machine and spiral bound, and the driver disk label's were just printed up on someone's laser printer. I think I'm on the "bleeding edge" of technology, ahead of the "leading edge." I ordered this card for my DX4/100 system at the house and just as soon as it arrives, I'm going to install the card and 3DS r3. I was real pleased to learn from Autodesk than it is not illegal to have multiple copies of 3DS installed since the program will not run without the hardware key. The Autodesk rep said that I could install it on the Pentium system at work, a 486DX2\50 at work, our Creative Director's DX4\100 at home, and my DX4\100 at home without violating any copyright laws. The only problem that I will have is the battle between me and our Creative Director to see who get to take the key home on the weekends. I can see it already, someone loses the key in transport and my boss has lunch on certain parts of our bodies. Oh well.
#100986From: Noah KennedyMay 10, 1994 10:36 PM
Ken- How do the DX4/100's compare in speed with the Pentiums for 3DS rendering? –Noah
#101396From: Kenny DubuissonMay 12, 1994 10:57 PM
The DX4\100's have not arrived yet. They are scheduled to be here next week. I cannot wait to try them, especially when the Vibrant driver is our for my new ATI PCI video card with the Mach64 chip. I'll keep you updated as to how it's going. BTW, I bought QEMM today and fell in love. I cannot believe how much better it is than MEMMAKER. I went from 505K free to 579K free and I have not even read the manual and tried to tweek it yet. It has literally, in one pass, solved all of my memory problems. Do you use it? Another question; what have you heard about 3D Studio for Windows (or NT?) Since I am new to the product and CompuServe, I have not seen if it is in the works or not. It would be nice for our artist because she is not comfortable with DOS, plus she would like to be able to edit in several things at once. Just though I'd ask. Talk to you soon. Kenny
#101428From: John TissavaryMay 13, 1994 3:41 AM
Autodesk does not release info on unreleased software. Therefore, your guess is as good as anybody's as to the next release of 3DS. There are no plans to make R3 a windows product, but you can run it from windows. Alan Inglesias, a forum regular, says R3 runs beautifully on his P5/60, but I know there are noticeable performance hits on a 486/66. I've heard windows runs better on the p5 than the /100, but who knows? Consult your manual for setting 3DS R3 up to run under windows. John Tissavary (LUNA cie)
#101646From: MARTIN G FOSTERMay 14, 1994 1:36 AM
John, >> Autodesk does not release info on unreleased software. << this is all rather amusing. The employees have to keep mum but Carol Bartz has publicly stated quite a bit about plans for rel 4 and further into the future. I won't say what she is quoted as saying (fear of castigation [ouch!] prevents me) but instead I will refer y'all to the Australian Multicad magazine (March '94) which shows that she was quote forthcoming about the direction of Acad 13, 3ds 4, and other Adesk products.
#101668From: John EllisMay 14, 1994 4:48 AM
>> The employees have to keep mum but Carol Bartz has publicly stated quite a bit about plans for rel 4… << CEO perogative! 🙂 (Bless her!) -JE
#101723From: MARTIN G FOSTERMay 14, 1994 2:25 PM
John, well if Carol has said things publicly, I should be able paraphrase here. Any Adesk/Yost people have any objection to that?
#101729From: John TissavaryMay 14, 1994 3:15 PM
I guess if you're the CEO, you can spill the beans if you want <g>. I'll have to get a copy of the magazine, and frame it <g>. John Tissavary (LUNA cie)
#101482From: Noah KennedyMay 13, 1994 9:53 AM
Kenny- We used to use QEMM to resolve conflicts between… I can't remember. BUt for awhile the thing to do was to use QEMM for some applications and not use it for others. We were re-booting all the time. Since 3DS supports XMS so well now we don't use it, except for manifest which is nifty for resolving memory conflicts. Since you haven't had a chance to tweak QEMM yet, I would go through Manifest (MFT.EXE) because it can give you some great tips on configuring QEMM. Re: 3DS on NT- I've heard nothing, which is surprising because Autodesk rarely makes future plans without consulting me first.<g> I thought it was a natural for them to port 3DS to NT as a native application, so as to take advantage of PowerPC, DEC Alpha, MIPS, platforms that run NT and to get away from this monstrous Phar Lap kludge. 3DS is selling so well, however, and NT must be such a challenge to port code to, that I would think Autodesk sees no need to be the one of the first applications to MAKE people go buy NT, which is what they would be doing. For every high-ender who would upgrade to an NT version, there must be several entry-level types who would buy the DOS version for the first time, and their money is the same. –Noah
#101031From: Accu-WeatherMay 11, 1994 7:46 AM
>…who get to take the key home on the weekends.< Better insure it. Don't know if anyone *actually* does this, but I've heard this suggestion before.
#101398From: Kenny DubuissonMay 12, 1994 10:59 PM
Good advice! I guess that I would have to have a $2500 rider on it since that is what we paid for the software. I don't think my boss is going to be too keen on this; but, he also knows that we would never take work home either. Interesting problem…