CompuServe Thread

flic playback

10 messages in this thread
#103444From: Thomas O'DeaMay 23, 1994 10:04 AM
Odds are you have purchased Pentiums equipped with MGA or equally shameful Windows accelerators. A number of manufacturers have begun skimping on DOS and VESA modes, which results in slow / non-existent support for movies and multimedia games. If you do have an MGA (Matrox) and cannot return it, you can purchase additional VGA cards ($100 tops) and disable the MGA's VGA emulation. This allows the computer to find your $100 VESA card before using your $500 SVGA card. If you need details, let me know via e-mail.
#103751From: John TissavaryMay 24, 1994 5:07 PM
I hate to tell you this, but the MGA kicks serious butt in 3D Studio. With some of the IPAS' of the future needing 24bits to be best (real-time preview), and hardware assisted 3D real-time (MGA I Impression), the MGA is an excellent card for 3DS. The only thing it sucks for is dos games. For MGA support in 3DS, just download the latest vibrant update from this forums library, install it, delete the 3dadi.cfg file, type 3ds vibcfg at teh dos prompt, and choose the MGA card that fits the bill, as well as the resolutions you want. EXCELLENT performance.
#103805From: M. G. BATCHELORMay 24, 1994 10:53 PM
Are you *_SURE_* you don't work for Matrox <BG> ?
#103840From: John TissavaryMay 25, 1994 2:00 AM
I don't work for matrox, but I do like their hardware a lot. I'm so excited about being able to use the MGA again (I bought it a month before R3 came out, and it hasn't been supported in R3 untill very recently). And I'm really jazzed about Sandra… in case you couldn't tell <g>.
#103883From: Yost GroupMay 25, 1994 10:00 AM
You want to come over and get my Impression 1024 working in 3ds? <g> – Jack
#104026From: John TissavaryMay 26, 1994 2:10 AM
He he he… Impression, huh? That's a S3 card, I believe. Matrox is kind of dropping the ball on that product – no more software revs. That's one of Matrox' weaknesses, they don't seem to have the resources to support all their cards, but the Impression is quite outdated at this point. Their new stuff is top of the heap, though, and they are supporting it with admirable tenacity. They've got a forum section here on Cserve, and response times are almost as good as this forum.
#104086From: Yost GroupMay 26, 1994 10:19 AM
>> Matrox is kind of dropping the ball on that product – no more software revs. That's one of Matrox' weaknesses, they don't seem to have the resources to support all their cards…<< So what makes you think they're going to support their current cards any more than they supported their "old" (one year) cards? – Jack
#104150From: John TissavaryMay 26, 1994 3:40 PM
Matrox' new cards will probably have a life span of 18mos. or so, when the next slew of 128bit cards comes out, and when there are too many apps to write drivers for they'll drop the ball. I don't care, because I'd rather get the newer technology and better performance, but there ARE plenty of people who don't share my view and I can completely understand that. Matrox is not the company for peole who plan on using their graphics cards for more than a couple of years. I am just grateful that one company isn't concerned with backward compatibility at the expense of new stuff. There are plenty of other companies that are very good at that. Actually, I heard that Matrox, after all, planning on doing another set of drivers for the Impression 1024, but its days are definitely numbered. John Tissavary (LUNA cie)
#104925From: May 31, 1994 2:22 PM
The Impression 1024 is an S3 911/924 card. We support it in 16/256 colors, but not the true-color modes. Matrox developed this weird propritary system for true-color on the S3 911/924 card, which we don't have any current plans to deal with… Sorry. Chuck Walbourn – Vibrant Graphics
#104928From: Yost GroupMay 31, 1994 2:33 PM
Ah. Now that that's confirmed, I guess I can stop holding my breath. <g> – Jack