CompuServe Thread

#Shell & stuff

21 messages in this thread
#50792From: Rick SchaefferJan 25, 1987 6:38 PM
Hi Don, I've picked up a few goodies from Usenet..but since I've been off the net here for quite a while I thought I'd check with you about whether they've been posted yet. First, I just picked up the executable and documentation for Matt Dillon's Shell version 2.05m. New stuff includes command line editing (you can still use "!nn" or "!str" to recall commands, the new feature is that you can use the up & down arrows to go back and forward in the history list & the left/right arrows & insert/delete character to edit the command line). Also, true path support has been added as well as recursive copy and delete (ie: you can copy an entire set of subdirectories) and sorted directories and an "exclude" option on directory listings. I don't have sources for 2.05m yet…they were truncated on my Usenet node. I was going to upload 2.04m sources but I'll wait for 2.05m. Perry Kivolowitz (ASDG) recently posted his recoverable ram disk driver and other utilities to Shareware. He asked anyone having Compuserve access to post it here also. Let me know whether you already have these things and, if not, I will upload them. Rick Schaeffer
#50821From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJan 25, 1987 9:49 PM
Rick, I think you intended this for me since it was addressed to Don… Anyway…upload away…we'd like them all. Don
#50863From: John DraperJan 26, 1987 12:12 AM
Rick, I just grabbed the rcoverable ramdisk from Perry off UseNet last night, but I havn't had time to upload it yet. Regards, Larry.
#50891From: BILL LEACHJan 26, 1987 1:15 AM
Rick: Please do! I noticed that Don already responded. Do you know if Matt or anyone else has taken care of the '! <CR>' 'bug? Are you using the Shell? 73s, bill
#50952From: Rick SchaefferJan 26, 1987 3:12 PM
Yes, that one was fixed in 2.04m I believe. At any rate there seems to be few, if any, bugs in this release. It appears to be real clean. Rick Schaeffer
#51067From: BILL LEACHJan 27, 1987 12:41 AM
Thanks Rick! I'll download it this week if I don't have to leave for San Diego right away. This shell seems super. I am not at all used to it yet and have not done much shell programming. Is there anyone around that is really knowledgeable about it? You possibly? If so I have some questions. 73s, bill
#51150From: Steven D. KapplinJan 27, 1987 10:09 PM
Rick, What is the meaning of the '%' in the shell? In the Alias example: alias xxx "%i echo this $i is a test" Is the '%' use to identify a passed variable on the command line? If so, how many passed parameters can be on the command line? There is no discussion of the '%' symbol in the docs. In other places in the documentation the '%' looks as though it is the prompt. How do you use the IF command to test for existence of a file on disk? (I want to set up a conditional copy which tests for files existence before it overwrites.) Thanks, Steve
#51277From: BILL LEACHJan 28, 1987 7:31 PM
Steve: When you get the answer to that one (IF exists) let me know. I was trying to do the same kind thing and was not able to get it done. Alas if it was only possible to get an improvement without loseing other features. 73s, bill
#51304From: Steven D. KapplinJan 28, 1987 9:16 PM
Bill, you can do something like this: "%q foreach i ( * ) \"if $i = $q ; do something, etc.;endif\"" if you pass a filename to 'q', then you can search for it and find a match. The '*' forces the foreach command to search the current directory. It's inelegant and somewhat slow, but works, sort of. can you use the '%q' in a shell file? or is it only usable in an alias? I haven't figured that one out yet. 73s Steve W4YVP
#51433From: BILL LEACHJan 29, 1987 8:41 PM
Steve: I am in the process of moving (again). I assume that the string that you showed was the argument to an 'alias' command. May get a chance to try it before I have to pack the AMI up again. At least it is going with me to San Diego. Originally, I did not think I would be able to take it with me this time. Where did you find out about the '*' command, in the 'docs'? If so, then I must have missed that one. 73s, bill
#51152From: Steven D. KapplinJan 27, 1987 10:12 PM
Rick, I also would like to suggest that the current directory be displayed in the prompt, because a command can no longer be used for the prompt display. Steve
#51332From: Rick SchaefferJan 28, 1987 10:56 PM
That sounds like a good idea, Steve. I will pass it on to Steve Drew via Usenet. As I do not yet have the source, there isn't much I can do about it. Hopefully, Steve will re-post it since *lots* of nodes besides the one I use reported that the source "shar" file was truncated somewhere along the line. As to the problem with checking if a file exists…I haven't had an opportunity to try that one out so I'll have to get back to you on it. Rick Schaeffer
#51411From: Steven D. KapplinJan 29, 1987 6:40 PM
Rick, Thanks, I appreciate that. The shell has improved quite a bit since 2.0 and probably needs just a little tweaking here and there. My main thoughts were that the internal commands could more closely mimic what the DOS commands did, especially when the shell doesn't provide an alternative, as with the IF EXIST example. STeve
#51445From: John DraperJan 29, 1987 9:02 PM
Steve, I don't know if you are aware of the feature, but you can use a different capitalization in order to tell the shell that you want to use the command in your C: or current directory. To see what I mean, type: Dir . the shell will assume you want an external command and will dispatch it to the OS. Regards, Larry.
#51513From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJan 30, 1987 12:00 AM
Larry, UNIX ™ and work-alikes are all case sensitive, which the Amiga is not…and that's a good point to keep in mind in refernce to the CSH. Don
#51498From: Rick SchaefferJan 29, 1987 10:54 PM
I dropped Steve a line on Usenet…we'll have to wait & see if he has any ideas. In the meantime, it should be possible to create a *real* short C program, named "Exists" which returns non-zero when an attempted open of the argument fails. It's a kludge…but a faster one than anything else I've been able to come up with. I'll keep in touch! Rick Schaeffer
#51538From: BILL LEACHJan 30, 1987 12:36 AM
Steve: If enough of the Unix commands exist, who cares? For me anyway, the AMI dos commands added some useful features not normally found in the micro world but left out some that I really missed. The shell is providing the best and most powerful 'CLI' even if it is a little painful to learn. The one that I would like to see is a way to spawn a new CLI automatically run the shell and a 'source.' 73s, bill
#51631From: Rick SchaefferJan 30, 1987 11:15 PM
I have a solution for that one! I have a real short script in my "s:" directory called "startcsh". It consists of a few initialization statements unique to my system and ends with the following two statements: stack 8000 (this is optional) csh s:.login Now then, the .login script is my standard system startup. In it I have an alias that looks like this: alias newcsh newcli con:0/0/640/200/NewCsh From s:startcsh When the shell is running, then, all I have to do to start another shell is type "newcsh" and…Presto!…I get a new window all set up and running the shell. It even has a title of "NewCsh" instead of New CLI! By the way, there is a PD utility called "xicon" (probably in one of the DL's) which allows you to use an icon to execute a CLI script. Sooo, I have an icon named "Csh.info", and a file called "Csh" which is a CLI script containing one line: newcli "CON:0/0/640/200/CShell Window" From s:startcsh This replaces the "CLI" icon and file on my workbench and gives me an icon that directly brings up the CShell! Best of all possible worlds, eh? Rick Schaeffer
#51867From: BILL LEACHFeb 1, 1987 1:42 AM
Steve: I sure do hope you stick around on CIS. I can see right now that knowing you will save considerable time and money! Thanks again! I'm real liberal about the stack, usually about 10Ks worth. I did not know about the 'from' command for a new CLI! Where is that one documented? 73s, bill
#51925From: Rick SchaefferFeb 1, 1987 11:08 AM
The "from" command is new for 1.2. It is documented in the "Enhancer" manual. It's a really nice feature! Rick Schaeffer PS: I've been around CIS for nearly as long as there's BEEN a CIS! Not likely to be leaving anytime soon <grin>. Rick
#51927From: Rick SchaefferFeb 1, 1987 11:33 AM
Hi again, Bill. I saw from another of your messages that you are (were) a Heath user. Well, my first Micro was a Heath H8 (1977). I, too, am very fond of HDOS! I still have and use an H100…and the old H8 was given to an old friend who is *still* using it every day. I also still have my old H9 terminal (need a good boat anchor?). Used to spend all my CIS time in the HUG sig but haven't been up there in quite a while since I got my Amiga. Rick Schaeffer