#AMAZING WINDOW 4.0
13 messages in this thread
RELEASED BY – ZIFF DAVIS (c) Microsoft Corp.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!AMAZING WINDOWS 4.0!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We are privileged this month to bring you our long overdue article on
Microsoft's groundbreaking Operating System, the incredible Windows
4.0. Our exceptional journalistic standards demand that we preface
this article by a restatement of our policy concerning review of
non-shipping products. While our policy has always been that we
would not review any product that is not actually shipping at the time
of publication, WE HAVE CHANGED OUR POLICY FOR THIS ISSUE ONLY. Our
policy for this issue is that we will review any product that someone
tells us might possibly be developed at any time in the future. After
his issue, our policy will revert to what it was prior to this issue
until such time that Microsoft begins to again consider their next
edition of software and begins another high-visibility promotion
geared to discourage users from looking at the competition.
We put the wonderful Windows 4.0 operating system through our
grueling bench benchmark program which was magnanimously donated to
PC Labs by Microsoft Corporation. Our test bed was the standard by
platform used most PC users–a Cray Supercomputer with 3 Gigabytes of
RAM and a $9000 Windows graphics accelerator card with 512 Megabytes
of SRAM. Our testing was made more difficult by the fact that no
actual code was available at the time of the procedure. We did have
available, however, a screen shot of the stupendous Windows 4.0 which
we put through its paces. Our staff was speechless over how pretty
the screen shot was. We also had the benefit of the assistance of 12
Microsoft employees who provided invaluable input, and also took us
to lunch as well as provide us all with free copies of MicroSoft
Office.
The tremendous Windows 4.0 was a dream to install. We didn't even
have to open the box! All of our applications were immediately
migrated into the new OS, except the OS/2 applications. They
mysteriously disappeared. We were told that this is a bug in the way
that OS/2 apps are written and that this was IBM's problem. The
screen shot scored a respectable .000001 Winmarks on our testing
platform. Microsoft officials assure us that performance of the
actual code promises to be even better. The only compatibility
problem arose when OS/2 for Windows stubbornly refused to load the
screen shot. Microsoft officials advise us that this was also IBM's
problem.
Microsoft officials told us that 4 Megabytes of RAM minimum would be
needed in the release version. However, they also said that they
would recommend 32 Megabytes for typical usage. Microsoft officials
said, and we agree, that all serious PC users will have 32 Megabytes
of RAM on their systems by the time Win 4.0 is released. Windows 4.0
is too sophisticated an OS for those that refuse to keep up.
We were at first concerned with the reports of the apparent absence
of 32-bit code contained in Windows 4.0. However, the Microsoft
officials soon set us straight. Due to Microsoft still having the
patent pending for the new technology, MS officials couldn't tell us
how it worked, but told us of a new Microsoft compression technology.
It turns out that all of the apparent 16-bit code present in Win 4.0
is actually 32-bit bit code that has been compressed by Microsoft to
look like it is only 16 bits. Microsoft officials say that this is
the wave of the future in 32-bit computing.
In order for you to take advantage of the power of Win 4.0, Microsoft
will be releasing three new products. These products are Visual
COBOL,Visual Assembler and Visual Machine Language. The Microsoft
representatives gave us a sneak peak of the Visual Machine Language
product. Visual Machine Language will contain the famous Microsoft
App Wizard. At first the App Wizard looked like it was only
generating huge random streams of ones and zeros. However, one
representative assured us that this was not the case and that MS had
used it to write most of the Windows NT code.
In summary, we can state without any fear of being accused of
hyperbole that the most excellent Windows 4.0 is the greatest
technological breakthrough since the discovery of fire and the
invention of the wheel (neither of which, unfortunately, is patented
by Microsoft….. yet). The God-like Windows 4.0 ranks right up
there with the other accomplishments of Microsoft, such as the
graphical user interface, the mouse, memory management and on-the-fly
disk compression.
It is at this point that we should state PC Magazine's new policy
with regard to software patents, viz., We feel strongly that any
software patent not held by Microsoft is void and bad for the
industry.
There will be a plethora of applications specifically written to take
advantage of the astounding Windows 4.0. All major software
developers are expected to begin work on products immediately after
reading this article. Versions of WordPerfect and Lemmings for Win
4.0 should be shipping by the time you read this. If you cannot wait
for your copy of the sexy Windows 4.0, we suggest you immediately go
out and buy a copy of the highly innovative MS-DOS 6.2. Follow that
up with several copies of the award winning Windows for Workgroups
3.11. If you are still impatient, buy the long awaited Windows NT,
which is available in bulk quantity from your local retailer at huge
discounts. By that time, if the most esteemed Windows 4.0 is still
not shipping, buy a few more copies of Windows NT.
[Parody Review of Win 95 O.S.]
" While our policy has always been that we would not review any product
that is not actually shipping at the time of publication, WE HAVE CHANGED OUR
POLICY FOR THIS ISSUE ONLY."
'WE HAVE _BENT_OVER_ FOR THIS ISSUE ONLY' <honest>
That's was entertaining Bobby.. A keeper!
-Chris
CNR Media Services
I hate to say it, for I like my Amiga(s) as much as anyone here, but Windows 95
is an acutal USEABLE O/S written by Microsoft. I've been using the final beta
version for two weeks and the biggest suprise is that it doesn't crash like
3.1. I actually LIKE it (scary thought!), especially the additional speed &
graphics software compared to my A3000/040. I'm having a hard time deciding if
I should keep going with the Amiga(s), or just jump over to 95.
Regards, Keith (Test pilot for Windows 95)
Qutoe: Keith Meyer,
I hate to say it, for I like my Amiga(s) as much as anyone here, but
Windows 95 is an acutal USEABLE O/S written by Microsoft. biggest
suprise is that it doesn't crash like 3.1. I actually LIKE it (scary
thought!).
Responded: Bobby Bartlett,
What's wrong with using Warp 3.0 (cost $75.00), which is as steady as a
rock for a P.C., compared to the continuous upgrade price of $200 or $300 for
Win 95. Now *that* should at least piss you off, knowing you're paying more
than just the $99.00 bucks for the final release.
I don't like OS/2 Warp for two reasons: It won't work on half the PC clones
I've tried to load it on, and it is very slow unless it has at least 20MB of
RAM to play with. Windows 95 has worked on every machine, although I will
admit it hasn't worked with all the peripherals, and runs fast on an 8MB
machine. I also have a feeling that Windows 95 won't be over $200 (not to
mention the price will dramatically drop), due to the fact that this is
Microsoft's new baby. They're gonna be pushing this down everyone's throat
just so that nobody will even take a second look at OS/2, and profit from the
sales of 32-bit Office & network applications.
Regards, Keith.
Keith,
You must have the opposite machines from ours. We crashed Win 95 100%
of the time to the point that we stop beta testing this month. Say forget MS
and went WARP.. We use 16 meg machines and all our MS Windows we used (and
crashed in Win 95) ran faster than in Win 3.11. I guess we are running IBM
electricity and you guys are running MS electricity.
Eduard Joseph
Bobby,
That is something I'll pass on!
Bart Van Bockstaele at 100574.2352@compuserve.com
… On AutoPilot and Amiga all the way from Belgium …
Bobby,
That is something I'll pass on!
Bart Van Bockstaele at 100574.2352@compuserve.com
… On AutoPilot and Amiga all the way from Belgium …
Bockstaele,
Do me an act of kindness and pass it on to Mr.BOOGIE DOWN BRONX
Serafin Tirado.
>>Do me an act of kindness and pass it on to Mr.BOOGIE DOWN BRONX Serafin
Tirado.<<
LOL!
Bart Van Bockstaele at 100574.2352@compuserve.com
… On AutoPilot and Amiga all the way from Belgium …
Bobby —
If you are going to repost, please credit the originator. This parody was
posted on Canopus last year. I can find out who posted it if you would like.
Bob Sanders [Rabbit]
Bobby —
If you are going to repost, please credit the originator. This parody was
posted on Canopus last year. I can find out who posted it if you would
like.
Bob Sanders [Rabbit]
To Mr.Sanders,
Excuse me, but if the author of the parody wanted to be known, he would
make himself known. When a text file with no i.d. floats around the net,
how could I or anyone know where it originated? I was just passing it
on. Thanx for the nfo.
BTW: Amazing Windows 4.0 was re-edited, just to let you know.
Bobby.
> Excuse me, but if the author of the parody wanted to be known, he
> would make himself known.
I don't want to pick nits, but not everyone frequents this forum.
> When a text file with no i.d. floats
> around the net, how could I or anyone know where it originated? I
> was just passing it on. Thanx for the nfo.
>
I realize that messages are spread throughout the world via the 'net, and I am
not blaming you for the repost, but when I have seen reposts in other fora,
they have been clearly marked as such.
> BTW: Amazing Windows 4.0 was re-edited, just to let you know.
Yes, I did notice the modifications. I don't know whether they improved it or
not, but they brought it up to date.
Bob Sanders [Rabbit]
Mr.Robert Sander,
odviously we can continue with this back and forth. Personally, I would rather
be in a heavy discussion on Amiga.
Mr. Sanders let it rest, man, you proved your point… really.