CompuServe Thread

#AMAZING WINDOW 4.0

13 messages in this thread
#46715From: BOBBY BARTLETTApr 30, 1995 4:40 PM
RELEASED BY – ZIFF DAVIS (c) Microsoft Corp. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!AMAZING WINDOWS 4.0!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We are privileged this month to bring you our long overdue article on Microsoft's groundbreaking Operating System, the incredible Windows 4.0. Our exceptional journalistic standards demand that we preface this article by a restatement of our policy concerning review of non-shipping products. While our policy has always been that we would not review any product that is not actually shipping at the time of publication, WE HAVE CHANGED OUR POLICY FOR THIS ISSUE ONLY. Our policy for this issue is that we will review any product that someone tells us might possibly be developed at any time in the future. After his issue, our policy will revert to what it was prior to this issue until such time that Microsoft begins to again consider their next edition of software and begins another high-visibility promotion geared to discourage users from looking at the competition. We put the wonderful Windows 4.0 operating system through our grueling bench benchmark program which was magnanimously donated to PC Labs by Microsoft Corporation. Our test bed was the standard by platform used most PC users–a Cray Supercomputer with 3 Gigabytes of RAM and a $9000 Windows graphics accelerator card with 512 Megabytes of SRAM. Our testing was made more difficult by the fact that no actual code was available at the time of the procedure. We did have available, however, a screen shot of the stupendous Windows 4.0 which we put through its paces. Our staff was speechless over how pretty the screen shot was. We also had the benefit of the assistance of 12 Microsoft employees who provided invaluable input, and also took us to lunch as well as provide us all with free copies of MicroSoft Office. The tremendous Windows 4.0 was a dream to install. We didn't even have to open the box! All of our applications were immediately migrated into the new OS, except the OS/2 applications. They mysteriously disappeared. We were told that this is a bug in the way that OS/2 apps are written and that this was IBM's problem. The screen shot scored a respectable .000001 Winmarks on our testing platform. Microsoft officials assure us that performance of the actual code promises to be even better. The only compatibility problem arose when OS/2 for Windows stubbornly refused to load the screen shot. Microsoft officials advise us that this was also IBM's problem. Microsoft officials told us that 4 Megabytes of RAM minimum would be needed in the release version. However, they also said that they would recommend 32 Megabytes for typical usage. Microsoft officials said, and we agree, that all serious PC users will have 32 Megabytes of RAM on their systems by the time Win 4.0 is released. Windows 4.0 is too sophisticated an OS for those that refuse to keep up. We were at first concerned with the reports of the apparent absence of 32-bit code contained in Windows 4.0. However, the Microsoft officials soon set us straight. Due to Microsoft still having the patent pending for the new technology, MS officials couldn't tell us how it worked, but told us of a new Microsoft compression technology. It turns out that all of the apparent 16-bit code present in Win 4.0 is actually 32-bit bit code that has been compressed by Microsoft to look like it is only 16 bits. Microsoft officials say that this is the wave of the future in 32-bit computing. In order for you to take advantage of the power of Win 4.0, Microsoft will be releasing three new products. These products are Visual COBOL,Visual Assembler and Visual Machine Language. The Microsoft representatives gave us a sneak peak of the Visual Machine Language product. Visual Machine Language will contain the famous Microsoft App Wizard. At first the App Wizard looked like it was only generating huge random streams of ones and zeros. However, one representative assured us that this was not the case and that MS had used it to write most of the Windows NT code. In summary, we can state without any fear of being accused of hyperbole that the most excellent Windows 4.0 is the greatest technological breakthrough since the discovery of fire and the invention of the wheel (neither of which, unfortunately, is patented by Microsoft….. yet). The God-like Windows 4.0 ranks right up there with the other accomplishments of Microsoft, such as the graphical user interface, the mouse, memory management and on-the-fly disk compression. It is at this point that we should state PC Magazine's new policy with regard to software patents, viz., We feel strongly that any software patent not held by Microsoft is void and bad for the industry. There will be a plethora of applications specifically written to take advantage of the astounding Windows 4.0. All major software developers are expected to begin work on products immediately after reading this article. Versions of WordPerfect and Lemmings for Win 4.0 should be shipping by the time you read this. If you cannot wait for your copy of the sexy Windows 4.0, we suggest you immediately go out and buy a copy of the highly innovative MS-DOS 6.2. Follow that up with several copies of the award winning Windows for Workgroups 3.11. If you are still impatient, buy the long awaited Windows NT, which is available in bulk quantity from your local retailer at huge discounts. By that time, if the most esteemed Windows 4.0 is still not shipping, buy a few more copies of Windows NT. [Parody Review of Win 95 O.S.]
#46719From: Christopher LapriseApr 30, 1995 9:08 PM
" While our policy has always been that we would not review any product that is not actually shipping at the time of publication, WE HAVE CHANGED OUR POLICY FOR THIS ISSUE ONLY." 'WE HAVE _BENT_OVER_ FOR THIS ISSUE ONLY' <honest> That's was entertaining Bobby.. A keeper! -Chris CNR Media Services
#46730From: Keith MeyersMay 1, 1995 6:15 PM
I hate to say it, for I like my Amiga(s) as much as anyone here, but Windows 95 is an acutal USEABLE O/S written by Microsoft. I've been using the final beta version for two weeks and the biggest suprise is that it doesn't crash like 3.1. I actually LIKE it (scary thought!), especially the additional speed & graphics software compared to my A3000/040. I'm having a hard time deciding if I should keep going with the Amiga(s), or just jump over to 95. Regards, Keith (Test pilot for Windows 95)
#46748From: BOBBY BARTLETTMay 2, 1995 1:45 PM
Qutoe: Keith Meyer, I hate to say it, for I like my Amiga(s) as much as anyone here, but Windows 95 is an acutal USEABLE O/S written by Microsoft. biggest suprise is that it doesn't crash like 3.1. I actually LIKE it (scary thought!). Responded: Bobby Bartlett, What's wrong with using Warp 3.0 (cost $75.00), which is as steady as a rock for a P.C., compared to the continuous upgrade price of $200 or $300 for Win 95. Now *that* should at least piss you off, knowing you're paying more than just the $99.00 bucks for the final release.
#46763From: Keith MeyersMay 2, 1995 6:15 PM
I don't like OS/2 Warp for two reasons: It won't work on half the PC clones I've tried to load it on, and it is very slow unless it has at least 20MB of RAM to play with. Windows 95 has worked on every machine, although I will admit it hasn't worked with all the peripherals, and runs fast on an 8MB machine. I also have a feeling that Windows 95 won't be over $200 (not to mention the price will dramatically drop), due to the fact that this is Microsoft's new baby. They're gonna be pushing this down everyone's throat just so that nobody will even take a second look at OS/2, and profit from the sales of 32-bit Office & network applications. Regards, Keith.
#46794From: Eduard JosephMay 4, 1995 5:42 PM
Keith, You must have the opposite machines from ours. We crashed Win 95 100% of the time to the point that we stop beta testing this month. Say forget MS and went WARP.. We use 16 meg machines and all our MS Windows we used (and crashed in Win 95) ran faster than in Win 3.11. I guess we are running IBM electricity and you guys are running MS electricity. Eduard Joseph
#46740From: Bart Van BockstaeleMay 2, 1995 12:05 AM
Bobby, That is something I'll pass on! Bart Van Bockstaele at 100574.2352@compuserve.com … On AutoPilot and Amiga all the way from Belgium …
#46750From: BOBBY BARTLETTMay 2, 1995 1:45 PM
Bobby, That is something I'll pass on! Bart Van Bockstaele at 100574.2352@compuserve.com … On AutoPilot and Amiga all the way from Belgium … Bockstaele, Do me an act of kindness and pass it on to Mr.BOOGIE DOWN BRONX Serafin Tirado.
#46779From: Bart Van BockstaeleMay 3, 1995 5:32 PM
>>Do me an act of kindness and pass it on to Mr.BOOGIE DOWN BRONX Serafin Tirado.<< LOL! Bart Van Bockstaele at 100574.2352@compuserve.com … On AutoPilot and Amiga all the way from Belgium …
#46795From: Robert SandersMay 4, 1995 7:05 PM
Bobby — If you are going to repost, please credit the originator. This parody was posted on Canopus last year. I can find out who posted it if you would like. Bob Sanders [Rabbit]
#46809From: BOBBY BARTLETTMay 5, 1995 6:03 PM
Bobby — If you are going to repost, please credit the originator. This parody was posted on Canopus last year. I can find out who posted it if you would like. Bob Sanders [Rabbit] To Mr.Sanders, Excuse me, but if the author of the parody wanted to be known, he would make himself known. When a text file with no i.d. floats around the net, how could I or anyone know where it originated? I was just passing it on. Thanx for the nfo. BTW: Amazing Windows 4.0 was re-edited, just to let you know. Bobby.
#46824From: Robert SandersMay 6, 1995 10:05 AM
> Excuse me, but if the author of the parody wanted to be known, he > would make himself known. I don't want to pick nits, but not everyone frequents this forum. > When a text file with no i.d. floats > around the net, how could I or anyone know where it originated? I > was just passing it on. Thanx for the nfo. > I realize that messages are spread throughout the world via the 'net, and I am not blaming you for the repost, but when I have seen reposts in other fora, they have been clearly marked as such. > BTW: Amazing Windows 4.0 was re-edited, just to let you know. Yes, I did notice the modifications. I don't know whether they improved it or not, but they brought it up to date. Bob Sanders [Rabbit]
#46830From: BOBBY BARTLETTMay 6, 1995 6:28 PM
Mr.Robert Sander, odviously we can continue with this back and forth. Personally, I would rather be in a heavy discussion on Amiga. Mr. Sanders let it rest, man, you proved your point… really.