CompuServe Thread

#Help selecting hardware

12 messages in this thread
#4557From: Hal HorenbergApr 10, 1995 10:27 PM
Hi, I am new to this fourm. I have an IBM "clone" 486 DX4 100 with 16 mb RAM, two IDE hard disks 1 212 MB and one 345 MB double spaced to 745MB -+, a Media Vision CD-ROM (SCSI) ProAudio Spectrum kit, VESA Video Card, VESA Multi I/O Card, two internal modems, HP ScanJet IIcx, and a Tape Drive with its own controller. I have ONE slot left If I move one of the devices over that does not use a slot (is possible??). I also have a VGA to TV device. Now…. I want to be able to create VHS video tape which will use my Sony Hi8mm Camcorder, Computer created presentation (MS Power Point or Harvard Graphics). You know wipes and swipes, and overlays, and titles. I may want to write some full motion video to disk and play with it before I move it to VHS. Question: What will I need? I know that is a big question, but I would like a big answer. What additional video boards, interface cards, connection devices should I get, and why?? I do not really want to spend a thousand or thousands of dollars. Any help would be appreciated. Hal :+}
#4578From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPApr 11, 1995 11:00 AM
Ha, It sounds to me like you want to be able to do digital video editing and to accomplish that you will probably want to add a Windows Video Capture Card like the Fast Movie Machine or the Miro DC1. Both are good products that allow you to capture video and audio to a hard disk, and then digitally cut and paste clips and graphics together to form a finished video. The output quality of these devices is sub-vhs quality, which I guess means that when people watch it they will know that it was not "professionally" produced, but it can still be enjoyable, 'course. The Movie Machine is a one slot solution when purchased without the optional M-JPEG module (which gives you hardware based compression and decompression for a higher quality) and sells for about $500 retail. You also may consider, with the prices of harddrives as low as they are, going ahead and getting yourself a nice fast gigger or so to hold the vast amounts of data that digital video editing creates. -John
#4611From: Jeff SauerApr 12, 1995 10:12 AM
Jeff: Sorry, but I don't think the Movie Machine is the choice here. As John Soberheim points out "The Movie Machine is a one slot solution when purchased without the optional M-JPEG module." Problem is, you gotta have that M-JPEG module to do what you want. As John Small points out in the following message, uncompressed video creates enormous and, literally, unmanageable files sizes and data rates. Without the M-JPEG compression broad you won't be able to capture anything more than a few frames. Also, I hope that tape drive controller is a SCSI so you can daisy chain a larger SCSI drive out there. Those IDE drives aren't going to do too much for you. They like the sock drawer in you're dresser when it comes to video. If you're going to have any video wardrobe at all you'll need more space. I don't know what you mean by double spacing you're second drive, does that have a Stacker kind of program going? If so, no good for video. Those involve compressing data, which I just said was necessary, but compressing video is a whole lot different than compressing other data. For one it all has to be done in real-time. The Stackers, etc. aren't designed for that. Jeff Sauer Desktop Video Group
#4586From: John SmallApr 11, 1995 3:56 PM
Check message #4483. It gives the big picture overview. To do linear editing will require only a genlock card but when you move to digital video capturing and nonlinear editing this is a big big step. It requires 2GB or more of hd to have any real usable space (we're talking 1mb/frame x 30 fps uncompressed raw data) and today's ISA capture cards are about to be replaced by more able PCI based cards. Still for your machine a Miro DC1 at $600 might interest you. As well as ///FAST Movie Machine Pro. Hope this helps some. -jts
#4605From: Timothy LiebeApr 12, 1995 9:39 AM
John: > It requires 2GB or more of hd to have any real usable space (we're talking 1mb/frame x 30 fps uncompressed raw data) and today's ISA capture cards are about to be replaced by more able PCI based cards. < One thing I'm STILL confused about re: PCI cards–is this going to mean we'll have to use PCI-compatible computers, and what would it take to make my year-old, still-paying-for-it pre-PCI computer PCI-compatible? Best, Tim
#4617From: John SmallApr 12, 1995 2:41 PM
Yes, you'll have to put the PCI card in a PCI slot. This means a PCI motherboard with Pentium cpu. The memory on these boards is 64 + 8 parity bits or 72 bit memory. You proabably have 32 + 8 bit memory chips on your 486 mobo. Of course memory is a bit hit since 16mb is minimum with NLE and 32mb is better. At $160/4mb that's a good chunck of change. Otherwise all your current components will move over just fine and you can use the same box. For this reason I roll my own and always put them in the larger tower cases. Easier to work with. -jts
#4632From: Timothy LiebeApr 13, 1995 8:39 AM
John: > Yes, you'll have to put the PCI card in a PCI slot. This means a PCI motherboard with Pentium cpu.< <*groan*> Just when I thought I had this under control… How much is one of these PCI motherboards? Best, Tim
#4645From: John SmallApr 13, 1995 12:32 PM
I'm not sure of the current price BUT the price will most definately come down by the time the PCI capture cards are available. Wait until the last possible moment before doing this upgrade. I recall $700-800 for a P90 mobo. -jts
#4661From: Timothy LiebeApr 14, 1995 8:26 AM
John: > I'm not sure of the current price BUT the price will most definately come down by the time the PCI capture cards are available. Wait until the last possible moment before doing this upgrade. I recall $700-800 for a P90 mobo.< Well, it ain't cheap, but it's less than I feared… Thanks! Best, Tim
#4667From: Jeff SauerApr 14, 1995 10:02 AM
I'm jumping in here to say that my high expectation for PCI bus solutions at NAB led to big disappointment. PCI is not worth waiting for in the short term. Like almost all other highly anticipated and hyped technology, this looks like it will take some time to work up to its billing. Reports from the development community seem to be that, yes, it gets great numbers in lab benchtesting, but the implementation is not solid yet. Further, the OS, both MAC and PC, can't take advantage of its raw speed. Windows95 is said to increase throughput over ISA, but NuBus is holding its own for the time being. I'm sure over time PCI will become the standard. This NAB seemed to be more about products that have been out for a generation or two at least, that work, and that producers can use and get work done reliably today. I suppose I ought to wait for Comdex in two weeks to say any more. But on the high end, PCI is not here yet.
#4670From: John SmallApr 14, 1995 11:41 AM
From what little I've read here a elsewhere about NAB it appears that no one had a functioning PCI capture card to show, did they? -jts
#4699From: Timothy LiebeApr 15, 1995 2:13 PM
Jeff: >I'm jumping in here to say that my high expectation for PCI bus solutions at NAB led to big disappointment. PCI is not worth waiting for in the short term. Like almost all other highly anticipated and hyped technology, this looks like it will take some time to work up to its billing. < Frankly, that's a relief to me! I couldn't exactly afford $800 for a PCI motherboard at this point in time, but I need to have a fairly up-to-date system if I'm going to be reviewing DTV products (which it's looking REAL good that I might be…). Well, we'll see… Best, Tim