CompuServe Thread

#Warp & Desktop Video

6 messages in this thread
#4450From: A. R. TandyApr 6, 1995 10:56 AM
PMJI, I am looking through some old messages on the forum, found yours, but the original is no longer here. So I will reply to you. I am using WARP for Windoze-based desktop video and get better performance than in DOS/Windoze. Because the original message is no longer here, I don't know your original questions. Be happy to contribute if you want to ask again. regards… A. R.
#4492From: Bill ReaganApr 7, 1995 6:38 PM
A. R. Thanks for showing interest. I have yet to upgrade to WARP but will. Though have been debating about waiting for 3.1. I know the kinks are in the system. 🙂 Originally, the very short thread was asking about what desktop video software ran under OS/2. My system is a 386sx, and I rather suspect somethings will need a 486. So I was just looking for suggestions on hardware/software. etc. and then at some point this year I'll upgrade the system and move to desktop video. Budget considerations are important [low is the key word: $1000. – 2,000. for hard/software combo. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Peace, Bill
#4527From: Zeddock MillerApr 10, 1995 6:57 AM
OS2 loves ram. Zeddock Miller
#4548From: Bill ReaganApr 10, 1995 6:05 PM
Is that a bumper sticker? Have run it quite successfully on my "garage special" 386sx with 8 meg of mem for sometime – no problemo. But with desktop video, any suggestions for when I upgrade? Thanks, Bill
#4599From: Zeddock MillerApr 12, 1995 9:23 AM
havn't gone through the video on a warped unit yet. I will. When I do I will post. I put OS2 on a 486 DX 66 with 8 megs. It seems slow compared to the windows environ. Speaking of Windows… I need to use alot of apps designed for windows. When I run them through OS2, they are really slow! Do you have any comments on possible problems I am having that would make this so? Thanx, Zeddock Miller
#4685From: Bill ReaganApr 14, 1995 7:39 PM
>Speaking of Windows… I need to use alot of apps designed for windows. When I run them through OS2, they are really slow! Do you have any comments on possible problems I am having that would make this so?< I have to confess to using Winnows apps also. Even gave up on CIM for OS/2 [till later . . .] However, Windows was only a concession, being built into OS/2. I have little experience with "It" outside of my own system which is a 386SX with 8 megs. So everything I do seemsto run just fine [translate: slow but sure], but I am happy. I will not even attempt desktop video until the system is upgraded. I did spluge and puchase a program which helps to optimize the OS/2 config.sys. For the little things it did for me it was worth the cost. Contact Kelly Schrock 70572,1247. Also there is a freeware program on the OS/2 users forum which will help with optimization also. As always, keep bugging software firms to write for OS/2 – and not just cripple Winnows versions! Peace, Bill