CompuServe Thread

Sony LVR3000 Control?

9 messages in this thread
#45433From: Angelo Guarino [DTI Inc]Jun 5, 1993 4:12 PM
All the responses implying that the 3000 programming is easy is true, but it is not trivial to write the ADI driver so that you can operate it from within 3DS and Anipro with Flitape. By the time you read the manuals (hardware and software), find a cable, program and debug, you will more than likely invest more that the animation controllers cost. I know that Greg has some utilities (but I'm not sure if they are in the form of an ADI). Also, you might consider SoftVTR. Not only does it have an ADI driver for 3DS and AniPro, but it also has everything you need for rotoscoping (requires frame grabbing software for Targa, Targa+, ATVIsta and IllPro .. which would require frame buffer programming on your part), the required cables, etc. It even has a VTR windows controller program .. all for under $1000. I have found thru hard experience (and we have 2 add-ons for ACAD) that it VERY RARELY pays to do it yourself when it comes to programming.
#45545From: MARTIN G FOSTERJun 7, 1993 5:18 PM
Angelo, I agree with you on some points but not others. The ADI driver programming is sure to be more involved and difficult (and expensive since you need to buy specific compilers) than just a straight command line program written with just about any simple, inexpensive interpreter / compiler / batch language but it will probably be quite a bit slower, similar to the way the diaquest and disk-to-vtr method with the LVR is much slower than the command line or DOS program methods I've seen. When time is money shaving a second or two off per frame to LVR can be significant in cost savings. Therefore, I think a lot of people may be happy to use the faster command line or dos utility. My next point is maybe one more of personal philosophy. I like to write my own utilities and may not save that much money by doing it but certainly get a lot of satisfaction from it. Consequently I like to pass on that philosphy to others and let them do with it as they choose. They can take the easy (and often expensive) route of buying custom software or they can study the manuals and come up with their own custom solution. Martin
#45555From: Angelo Guarino [DTI Inc]Jun 7, 1993 7:22 PM
Martin, I wouldn't disagree with any of your points. The point that I wanted to make was that when you are comparing programming it yourself to a packaged product, you aren't comparing apples and apples. In the SoftVTR case, you get the Windows program AND the ADI driver AND the batch file generator for putting to tape AND a batch file generator for digitizing sequencial frames from tape AND the frame buffer programs for digitizing (which would require you to purchase the develper's toolkit for the Targa+ or the IllPro) … well that it is hard to compare that with the basic functions that you would get with a "do it yourself" version. The second point I was trying to make that doing it yourself isn't always less expensive. If you consider that you could be charging $75+/hr for your animation serivces, it doesn't take long to spend more doing it yourself … or atleast spend nearly as much and not have nearly as much. Of course if you love to program and your just looking for an excuse to write something (and strange as that sounds, I like to sink my teeth into a program from time to time) .. well go for it and all that I said doesn't matter a'bit. Ang
#45583From: MARTIN G FOSTERJun 8, 1993 1:16 AM
Ang, >> If you consider that you could be charging $75+/hr for your animation serivces, it doesn't take long to spend more doing it yourself … or atleast spend nearly as much and not have nearly as much. >> Teehee, if I had plenty of $75+/hr work happening all the time you are right I probably wouldn't be messing with programming utilities and fixing my own hardware problems <g>! Wow, that would be a great situation but the sad fact is that isn't the case and probably won't be for a couple more years (or ever?) It's not that I can't make that kind of hourly rate it's just that there's not that much work around even if you do have really good contacts and are known by lots of people. Just recently something happened that may illustrate my point. One of my 486/33 systems locked up and refused to boot on power up. A dealer told me just to buy a new motherboard to replace the old one since "the time you spend trying to diagnose the problem you could have a new motherboard for price of your time". Being a hands-on kinda guy, and not willing to give up that easily, and also not having any $75+/hr work pending anyway <g>, I decided to try to diagnose the system problem. To cut a long story short I had the system working again by removing and correctly reinstalling the m/board and it took me about 2 hours which is probably the price of a new m/board (if I scavenged the cpu). Was this time well spent? I think so, but not so according to my dealer. What do you think?
#45600From: Don LandisJun 8, 1993 11:28 AM
PMJI Hooooray for you, Martin! Reading this thread I felt so inadequate at having never even gotton close to the common income of you gurus at $75+ per hr. ($156,000 per yr) doing animation. I was about to take my modem back on the other side of the tracks when I read your response. I do just like you, Martin. I tinker and solve my own problems between those <$75/hr jobs. My dealer doesn't like it either and he feels my time would be better spent if I just let him service my equipment. BTW he only charges $40.00/hr. An associate of mine used to brag about all those $6-10K animation jobs he landed. Why then did the finance company repo all his equipment last winter?
#45631From: Paul LindJun 8, 1993 6:15 PM
PMJI on your PMJI, but IMHO $75 an hour is not high in this market. As a matter of fact if our company used that as a basis we would be broke in less than three months. Working cheaper may be possible for one or two man firms but for those companies, including ourselves, who have to make a payroll for 10 or more people, plus run large networks to compete with our workstation based competition, we have to maintain our rates above that level. There are consultants in this area who consistently get $250+ an hour for consulting alone! Angelo has one working in his area, and this particular guy constantly turns business away. A $6000 to $10000 animation is not that hard to find! Of course you need to have the tools and personnel to complete the project, but hey! I once gave animations away, but I found that most of the large clients weren't seriously considering our work because we were so far under the competition, They figured that we weren't delivering the same level of work.. So I raised our prices, got ALOT of work and ended up buying new equipment and hiring a staff. And as to the finance company mentality, I'm happy to say that our company is 100% privately held and we pay cash for EVERYTHING! This market is extremely alive and there are lots of clients, I have a local competitor who gets more than $100 an hour and he has another full time job, no real overhead, etc. Now as a final note/disclaimer for the random user, It makes a tremendous difference as to how well versed both you and your staff are in 3D animation. Obviously if it takes us a quarter of the time to do the same animation, and we match your final price, then we're making 4 times as much per hour. Additionally, we NEVER base any work on a per hour basis, it causes one to purposely work slow, not good for business. We do however have a per week $ amount that has to be maintained and in the end our animation work rarely if ever goes for under $75/hour. Also Angelo and I sorta overlap in the geographical sense, we're both in the golden mean of the corporate/government haven of the U.S. Just thought I'd throw in my two cents worth! I'm also involved with a local research group based at a local University and very shortly we will be publishing a paper on animation work in the government and private sectors, its impact, average prices, and forcast for the next five years.(Did I mention that my graduate work is in Economics?<g>) I had to find someway to finish out my graduate work and generate something useful for my company.(Big<g> 🙂 Wow!! I am extremely long winded! Paul .
#45676From: MARTIN G FOSTERJun 8, 1993 10:53 PM
sounds like I'm in the wrong geographic area or something. They do say that SoCal is in a bigger recession than the rest of the states so maybe that accounts for the problems of not finding much $75+/hr work. I can often make that kind of hourly rate on the projects I do but there just isn't that much work around anyway.
#45651From: Angelo Guarino [DTI Inc]Jun 8, 1993 9:25 PM
>> time well spent? Martin, Well since you fixed the problem in 2 hr's, I guess it was. The flip side is when you spend 8 hrs and its still broke … then was the time well spend. Now I'm not suggesting to buy a new car when the ash tray gets full or anything <g> … just wanted to point out that you want to beware of false economies and that when possible you don't want to compare apples and oranges .. or even oranges and tangereens <sp?> Ang
#45671From: MARTIN G FOSTERJun 8, 1993 10:47 PM
Ang, re: fixing my system in 2 hrs OK, it worked out for the best in that case but I don't think I would have felt too bad if I hadn't fixed it and had to spend money on a replacement. I think I would have stopped before 8 hrs – I'm not a masochist <g>.