CompuServe Thread

#Glacial Geology

12 messages in this thread
#133425From: Harriet Goldis/WAJun 3, 1994 12:22 AM
Hi !! Anyone have any good suggestions for information on the glacial history of Washington State, or expanded to the Pacific Northwest ???? I have found various papers on limited sites or short generalizations in texts, but I am looking for the history for the Cascades and the Olympics (and surrounding areas). All suggestions welcome !!!! thanks —
#133461From: RICHARD I GIBSONJun 3, 1994 3:54 PM
Harris & Tuttle's book "Geology of National Parks" has what I would call thorough summaries of all aspects of the geology of Olympic, North Cascades, and Crater Lake and Ranier, including glaciation, but it may still be less than you want. Its a good book though. Regards, Dick Gibson
#133508From: Bill Webb /CAJun 4, 1994 12:29 AM
Two suggestions.. (I cannot testify to availability in bookstores or libraries) McKee, Bates: Cascadia McGrawHill, 1972 ISBN 07-045133-8 This is a beautifully illustrated book, nice maps, and while no longer completely up-to-date would be a good introduction. Allen, John Eliot; and Burns & Sargeant: Cataclysms on the Columbia. Timber Press (Portland), 1987 ISBN 0-88192-076-3 Challenges the long held diastrophism theories about geological events, showing that in late Pleistocene times a major and periodic cataclysmic flood came down the Columbia with devastating results, creating geological features clearly visible today. This flooding was due to the release of a vast amount of water held behind an ice floe which periodically would rupture, in the neighborhood of what is now Missoula, MT. The flood would plunge down the Columbia River tearing out most everything in its path, and reorganizing the geography of the Willamette Valley, the Columbia Gorge, etc. Hope this helps.. Bill
#133605From: Lanny R. ReamJun 5, 1994 12:18 AM
Cataclysms on the Columbia is interesting reading, but the ideas of the floods were proposed long before 1987 (J. H. Bretz published the first major report on them in 1959) and they are now long accepted as being what created the "Channeled Scablands" of E. Washington, and Dryfalls near Grand Coulee, giant ripple marks in the same area, etc. The ice dam that formed glacial Lake Missoula (around 20,000 years ago was at the north end of present Lake Pend Oreille, just north of where I currently sit in N. Idaho. Incidently, the floods happened several times and the last (and possibly greatest) released a volume of water equal to a flow about 10 times the present flow of all the rivers in the world (9.5 cubic miles per hour). Just incase anyone is interested. Lanny
#133692From: Bill Webb /CAJun 5, 1994 11:12 PM
Correction.. Thanks Lanny. The book I cited essentially was a review of how Bretz' theory was not accepted for some time, due to conservatism of the geology community and its obsession with slow processes as the ONLY way geological events were supposed to occur. The importance of the book is that it shows first of all how the theory was arrived at (geological evidence) and then how it was ignored for so long. It was one of hell of a flood, that last one! Bill
#133693From: Lanny R. ReamJun 5, 1994 11:27 PM
Yeah, many of us geologists like to think things happen only in "geologic time". I wonder what some of them think of such things as Mt. St. Helens nasty little eruption in 1980. Now those slow thinkers who do accept Bretz's floods believe there were something like 7 of them. Pretty difficult setting up your teepee there for a few years! Lanny
#133826From: Dean MillerJun 7, 1994 11:07 AM
Hi Lanny, Bill, and everyone, I'm definitely not a geologist (physicist, actually) but a question has been puzzling me for many years. Basically, I'm trying to find out the generally accepted time for the end of the last ice age in the Midwest US. The reason is that along the west "coast" of Iowa are a series of hills called the "loess" hills. The hills in the rest of Iowa (and surrounding states) are mostly glacial moraines (except for the "driftless area" in NE Iowa and SW Wisconsin). My problem is that the loess hills were created by wind-blown dirt, and most of the descriptions I've been able to find seem to assume they are millions of years old. The hills are in a band about 300 miles N-S and 10-20 miles E-W with a relief of about 400 feet along the Missouri river (the northern 30 miles or so are along a smaller stream). It seems to me that these hills had to be created after the ice finally melted which implies a tremendous wind at one or more times since the ice age ended. Can anyone help ease my puzzlement? Thanks, Dean
#133868From: Lanny R. ReamJun 7, 1994 9:44 PM
Sorry Dean, But I can't help much. I don't have any geology texts handy that would specifically show where the southern extent of the ice was in the Midwest. The ending it would have to be much the same as elsewhere, and that was generally thought to be a little less than 10,000 years ago (I haven't kept up on any refinements of that.). If the ice extended south of where the loess hills are, then obviously these hills have to be younger than the last ice sheet, but they could well be S. of the ice sheet and have originated from its action, see below. We have the same thing in this area, primarily in E. Washington from just S. of Spokane south and to the southwest to Richland. The loess here is believed to have originated as the fine material that originated from the glacial outwash (with a lot of Cascade volcanic "ash" thrown in) then was blown back NE'ly by the winds. It doesn't take very strong winds. The loess hills are where the wheat of E. Washington is grown, and with all those fallow fields, any good windstorm (about 40 mph will do it) will pick it up and dump the stuff on me in N. Idaho. This is really a lot of fun, because when the storm gets here, it generally rains, so what we get is a "mud storm"! Lanny
#133604From: Lanny R. ReamJun 5, 1994 12:18 AM
Hi, Don't forget the Washington Div. of Geology and Earth Resources publications, especially the following: Washington Geolgy and Resources by CD Campbell, Info Cir 22R Origin of Cascade Landscapes by Mackin & Cary, Info Cir 41 Tertiary Geologic History of Western Oregon and Washington by PD Snavely and HC Wagner, Rept of Inv 22 Geologic History and Rocks and Minerals of Washngton by VE Livingston, Info Cir 45 These are all somewhat dated, but the basics still hold true. They may all be out of print, but are available in libraries. Phone the Division at 206-902-1450. Lanny
#133678From: Michael SternbergJun 5, 1994 9:23 PM
Harriet – You might try to get a hold of a copy of Geological Excursions in the Pacific Northwest, Field trip notes from the 1977 Annual Society meeting, published by the Dept. of Geology, Western Washington Univ., Bellingham, WA 98225. Edited by Brown and Ellis. Section 13 covers Glaciation and Catastrophic Flooding of the Columbia Plateau. There are other references to glaciation in the other 12 field trips, but generally only in passing comment. Other references from my library on Glaciation: Fire and Ice: The Casade Volcanoes Stephen Harris ISBN 0-89886-009-1 Pub. The Mountaineers The Shape and Form of Puget Sound Robert Burns ISBN 0-295-96184-8 Pub. Puget Sound Books After the Ice Age: the Return of Life to Glaciated North America E.C. Pielou ISBN 0-226-66811-8 Pub. University of Chicago Press I will continue looking for other references for you. Regards – Michael (in Anacortes)
#133829From: Liz WavadaJun 7, 1994 1:25 PM
This may be in the realm of "generalizations from texts", but have you tried the Roadside Geology series of books? (Roadside Geology of Washington, Roadside Geology of Idaho, et al.) They are readily available at bookstores such as Waldenbooks and B. Dalton. Liz Wavada Spokane
#133969From: Shannon SikesJun 8, 1994 9:05 PM
Liz, Another "Roadside Geology" lover? Me, too. I've used Texas, Utah and Arizona lately. I wish they'd come out with one for my state, Florida. But a friend and I joked that it would only end up being a pamphlet, continually repeating: on your left is swamp. On your right is…swamp. And then over there is…more swamp (formed over eons and eons of time ;-)) Seriously, it would be a little more interesting than that. What books have you used/did you really like? What other geo books do you recommend? I'm a John McPhee fan, at the moment. Shannon