CompuServe Thread

#Amiga User International

31 messages in this thread
#49839From: Vance SchowalterJan 13, 1993 12:33 PM
Hi, Ben! I've picked up the January 1993 issue of Amiga User International (another british magazine), and it is just GREAT! It has ALOT of qualities I wish the AW had. One thing AUI is not, is boring! I haven't seen the A1200 or A4000 in person, yet, but AUI did a big spread on AmigaDOS 3.0 as well as the new Amigas. It was the next best thing to actually having 3.0 to play with! It had colour pics and details of all of the enhancements (ie. the new palette requestor) and it left me drooling. They came to the same conclusions as everyone else in their review, including the disdain of using IDE instead of SCSI II. They had Image Master mentioned more than once, including the one-ups over MorphPlus, which they were reviewing. The reviewer spoke quite favourably about the prompt updates to IM. I'd recommend any Amiga user to get a copy, even if the price of the mag is high. I paid $8.95 Canadian for it. They also had euro-CBM rumours of an A2000 replacement, the A2200. The same applied for the A3000, probably would be A3200. It wasn't flooded with game reviews, even though it did have them. And the reviews were done VERY well! One of the main articles was entitled, "The Secretive World of Amiga Development" and another was showing how brush-mice can be useful to starving animators/artists who can't afford tablets. Yet another article had great Imagine tips on using the FOG attribute. Although it's not a tech mag, it certainly fills the AW niche far better than AW has been able to do. The mag's sub-header is "The Best Amiga Magazine". If this issue is any indication, they are correct. Vance
#49846From: Black Belt SystemsJan 13, 1993 1:58 PM
Vance, I've read that magazine; I like it too, predictably. I'm afraid that AW doesn't have the "page budget" to do the depth of reviews that AUI does. The quality is higher also, for which AW has no excuse, imho, but there is nothing we can do but hope and wait for improvements. –Ben …via AutoPilot
#49864From: Betty Clay/SYSOPJan 13, 1993 9:16 PM
AUI is a pretty good magazine. I almost never read it, though. I know it's been a long time, and we're supposed to forgive and forget, but I still remember that they bought TRANSACTOR just so they could kill it. And that they published several articles of mine in AUI for which they refused to pay. Of course, that was before they went into the English equivalent of Chapter 11. I have a letter from an English judge saying that if, after three more years, they are making any money, they will consider paying the authors. Some friends are writing for them right now, and they are having no problem getting paid for current articles, so I guess they are doing better now. —Betty
#49869From: Black Belt SystemsJan 13, 1993 10:35 PM
I can understand your concerns; we've (that is, those of us who have written articles) probably all got horror stories; sometimes the inability to pay actually is NOT the fault of the mag (or whoever). These things have a tendancy to trickle down to the last dependant in the chain. –Ben …via AutoPilot
#49894From: Vance SchowalterJan 14, 1993 11:46 AM
What were your articles in AUI on? Vance
#49939From: Betty Clay/SYSOPJan 15, 1993 12:11 AM
There was a series on the structure of the file system and recovery of bad disks, and another series on graphics – views and viewports and such. It was several years ago now – probably about 1988. I cannot recall whether there were any others. —Betty
#49995From: paul nixJan 15, 1993 11:24 PM
Hi'ya Betty … haven't seen you in ages (my fault; have quit going to any of the Dallas-area Amiga clubs). I winced when you mentioned "The Transactor" in a message. I've never figured just how much money I lost when they went belly-up, but I was a disk-subscribing "Amiga Transactor" member, and lost way too much. Last year, when "Amiga World" killed its technical publication (the name escapes me at the moment), and then tried to have us take BIX memberships instead of paying us our money back … I wrote them a letter, and specifically mentioned that I was STILL smarting from my experience with the "Transactor" folding, such that I was VERY critical of anybody trying to default on their end of a deal (I sent them money, in exchange I expected to get some certain number of magazines). Well, to their credit, "Amiga World" did send me a check, paying me for the magazines that they never published. Adios for now. Paul Nix Garland, Texas
#50041From: Betty Clay/SYSOPJan 16, 1993 11:12 PM
Paul, I was also a disk-subscriber to the Transactor – and I not only lost that. They had not paid me for quite a few of the articles they printed, too. But I still love the Transactor and think it was the best magazine we ever had, unless maybe it was the Amiga Apprentice and Journeyman. I was also given, supposedly, BIX membership for my AmigaWorld Tech Journal subscription. Problem is, BIX never gave me any credit for it. In fact, they charged me even more. When I got bills in the range of $70 each month for about three months running (all the while supposed to be getting credit for the AWTJ) I just closed my BIX account. By the way – we'd love to have you come to the meetings again. I seem to be very good at killing off magazines and losing money in the process. —Betty
#50062From: Black Belt SystemsJan 17, 1993 2:15 PM
Betty, As one who still frequents BIX (and regularly considers leaving), I can tell you with a clear conscience you're missing almost _nothing_. The worthwhile activity that goes on over there is totally limited to the CBM closed areas; vendor accounts see only a tiny fraction of the activity they do here; and the management of the many isolated areas BIX calls "conferences" is just terrible. Censorship abounds, as does cliquey commentary. The message base lacks the most basic of amenities, such as who a message is actually addressed to, notification of a public message for you, and message formatting capability. One thing that particularly bothers me (but seems to be a matter of taste) is the schiztoid fracturing of the message base into zillions and zillions of conferences. One good thing about it – every time I use BIX, I realize just how good CIS is. :^) –Ben …via AutoPilot
#50080From: Betty Clay/SYSOPJan 17, 1993 10:48 PM
I never did read anything except the amiga.cert conference, anyway. And I agree with your assessment of it entirely. I found it terribly hard to follow a thread, etc. I can't say that I really miss it at all. —Betty
#50148From: Vic WagnerJan 18, 1993 11:00 PM
You and me both. I dread logging onto BIX (tho I've managed to make the checking for new SW to test relatively painless (I do it before I wake up in the morning)).
#50155From: Black Belt SystemsJan 19, 1993 12:37 AM
Yah. You can't tell them anything over there though. –Ben …via AutoPilot
#50245From: John GagerJan 21, 1993 3:17 AM
Have either of you tried BixShell? It's available for Baud Bandit or VLT. I have the Baud Bandit version and it makes the process of selecting new files, sending Email, and getting conference messages rather painless. // \X/ John – K7KB (Who enjoys harrasing the vendors)
#49858From: Jonathan HirschmanJan 13, 1993 7:42 PM
Vance, Just to add some further rumors to those supplied by AUI (and these are *THIN* rumors)… Log onto the Utilities Unlimited BBS, and they will ask you what kind of Amiga you have. Choice include A4000, A4000T, A4200, A4200T. Do they know something we don't, or is it just wishful thinking on their part (they do a lot of wishful thinking, that ends up on their spec sheets for their products…:)? Jonathan, via AutoPilot // Only Amiga makes \\// it possible…
#49895From: Vance SchowalterJan 14, 1993 11:46 AM
I figured CBM would make an A4000T, someday. But, an A4200/T? What the heck could they have in that?? Vance
#49937From: Jonathan HirschmanJan 14, 1993 11:40 PM
Vance, Take this as an uneducated guess. I think that the line-up is going to be something like this: 4000 series will consist of machines identical to the present 4000. There will probably be an added machine, the 4000/030. A 4000t will be the same, but in a tower config. The 4200 will have SCSI II and a DSP built in or bundled. The 3200 will be the same, but with an '030. The 2200 (yeah, really guessing now!) could be the new Toaster vehicle…how about something like the present 1200, but in an oversized case, so that the form factor illegal Toaster will fit it. If the names are wrong, at least that is what I think a new Amiga lineup will be like. Considering the trend towards modularity, the dealers could simply mix and match components to make up these different configs. Jonathan, via AutoPilot // Only Amiga makes \\// it possible…
#49976From: Peter GreciJan 15, 1993 3:52 PM
Vance,they mention the A4200 in this momths Amazing Amiga Roomer area as a Possible A4000 with a 030 instead of 040
#49981From: Thomas VoirolJan 15, 1993 5:20 PM
Peter, 4200 being a cut-down 4000 sounds illogical to me. Tom / Amiga Imagineer from Switzerland with AutoPilot engaged
#49983From: Vance SchowalterJan 15, 1993 8:13 PM
Sounds odd to me, also. Vance
#49998From: Michael GerardJan 16, 1993 1:43 AM
Sounds like CBM to me.
#50018From: Vance SchowalterJan 16, 1993 1:05 PM
Well, as odd as the numbering scheme may be, it's better to have greater selection with odd numbers than no selection at all. We'll live. *8> Vance
#50224From: Peter GreciJan 20, 1993 4:40 PM
Illogical to you and me but Some Folks are using their Amiga's for Hobby Use and just want to get at the A4000 but don't have the $$$ they Begged for a 68030 version and it look slike they'll get it. I think "I" would rather go for a A1200 with a 68030 from Microbotics just to fiddle with AGA graphics but thats just ME.
#50237From: Pete MilesJan 20, 1993 7:44 PM
Peter, Getting an A1200 is a good move. A friend of mine has one and has installed a 60mb hdisk and extra 32bit mem. The mem makes a tremendous difference. Using the AIBB program suggests that the 'modified' a1200 is almost as fast as an A3000 (which I have) certainly when running Propage there is just about a recognisable difference in screen update in favour of the A3000. So for a quick machine etc with the new chipset the A1200 is a very very good bet. Pete from Dorset in Englands West Country – via Whap!
#50262From: Peter GreciJan 21, 1993 5:14 PM
Thanx for the info Pete, you were the gent looking for Steve Worley's book right? if so ,Email me and we'll discuss the possibility of me selling you mine.
#49921From: Pete MilesJan 14, 1993 5:18 PM
Vance, I would also reccomend you read AMIGA SHOPPER, another Britsih mag. This isn't so colourful as AUI and is not on glossy paper. However, it does not cover any games, has far more Readers Letters, more techy stuff including Arexx, C and lots lots more. Generally thought of very highly over here. Pete from Dorset in Englands West Country – via Whap!
#49941From: Betty Clay/SYSOPJan 15, 1993 1:07 AM
Pete, I don't think AMIGA SHOPPER is available over here. I get it by mail, but I have not seen it in any of the stores around here, and my dealer gets most of the British Amiga magazines. —Betty
#49951From: Michael GerardJan 15, 1993 3:13 AM
I've purchased Amiga Shopper at a local 'computer superstore' here in Cleveland.
#49986From: dan barberJan 15, 1993 9:09 PM
Pete, Im just jumping in the middle of the conversation but I know Gene's Books in the King Of Prussia Plaza (KofP PA) carries almost all of the British Amiga mags including Amiga shopper! Dan Barber
#50203From: Skip DyrdaJan 19, 1993 7:46 PM
Hey! I used to run down to Gene's Books all the time for my monthly magazine `fix'<G>. The book store in the newer section of the mall also has a decent selection of mags and even carries Amiga software. Or did. Now that I'm in Florida, I miss the mall. My wife and I went there often. Skip
#50016From: Darron C. KnutsonJan 16, 1993 12:44 PM
Betty, A local book/magazine store here in Minneapolis-St. Paul had Amiga Shopper last summer, but I haven't seen it for six months or so. It looked like a good publication. Darron
#50042From: Betty Clay/SYSOPJan 16, 1993 11:12 PM
I like it. —Betty