CompuServe Thread

#CU Amiga June

18 messages in this thread
#149352From: Hans KeesomMay 29, 1994 3:01 AM
>>Secondly, the Amiga 1200 CD drive. After months of speculation there it was, in prototype form, at last. My position on the add-on is that we have to work towards a fair price. It can't support MPEG and I think this will be a disappointment for some people unless we price it right.<< There now a cheap way to connect a CD32 to your Amiga. It's called the communicator and costs about $150. If you want more info let me know.
#149428From: Richard DanielMay 29, 1994 1:09 PM
PMFJI but C= are very relectant to release such a add-on for the 1200, mainly, they say, because it is not FMV compatable. Could the real reason behind it be because C= are planning a new Amiga possibly called the 1400. The 1400 would be a 1200 without the numerical pad and with a CD drive moulded in on the left hand side. And of course would be FMV compatable. This would solve all problems with slight incompatability problems and FMV in one. Could this possibly be true??? – it would explain a few things!! —–Richard Daniel
#149530From: Alex BakerMay 29, 1994 10:27 PM
>> PMFJI but C= are very relectant to release such a add-on for the 1200, mainly, they >> say, because it is not FMV compatable. Could the real reason behind it be because C= >> are planning a new Amiga possibly called the 1400. Where have you been? C= is in liquidation in the Bahamian courts, and unless whomever gets the rights to the technology sees fit to continue the Amiga line, there won't be 1200 add on's let alone a 1400. Ever wonder why C= had such a hard time responding to market demand? Ever since the introduction of the CDTV, owners havve been screaming for CD Rom add-on's. They only one C= ever introduced was for the 500, and that was after they had stopped production of the 500. And some continue to wonder why C= died.
#149818From: Richard DanielMay 31, 1994 1:25 PM
Yes fair enough, but I`m talking more about the UK and European operation. They are still operating, but probably do not have the resources to develop such a machine. I am also talking about if a possible takeover or whatever happens, the possible 1400 might then become a reality. Also before C= in USA went into liquidation they may have had the 1400 on their drawing boards, being investigated or maybe even towards the prototype stage, (howver this is unlikely). As a result if a takeover ever takes place a 1400 or some such machine could be produced. —–Richard Daniel
#149879From: Kevin SangwellMay 31, 1994 4:39 PM
Richard, Do you belive everything you read in Amiga format? 😉 As messages here point out CBM, are out of business, not just in the states, but WORLDWIDE. The onwing body of _ALL_ Commodore companies CIL (as far as we can tell) has gone into liquidation. This means that all it's assets and subsiduaries belong to the creditors, they cannot trade any longer. The only chance for reprieve we have is that someone (Samsung are the most likely according to the rumor mill) buys the rights and/or the technology and can carry on the Amiga we all love (or not) and cherrish (or not). The major stumbling block in our understanding is how C= Germany/Canad and UK are still trading. According to my sources, C= UK went bust two weeks ago last friday, but I have been unable to check this although the source is fairly reliable. So unfortunately an A1400 is unlikely for the forseable future 🙁 even if one were to appear tomorrow, it would take far more than a CD based A1200 to save the amiga, we need a big selling machine to interest the games developers again, to pull them back from developing for the PC and Mac (if you've seen any games for them recently, you'll know what I mean) This is not meant as a flaming (I subscribe to Amiga Format and read it every month) but a more rational view of the current situation. Also remember that the magazine goes to print around two to three weeks before it hits the shelves… Kevin 68030/40 A1200… On AutoPilot from Surrey in the UK
#150008From: Mal LansellJun 1, 1994 8:37 AM
Kevin, Commodore UK are still trading – they did not go bust two weeks ago as you say. How do I know? They have just (this week) put together a CD32 gold disk for me. The people there are also very upbeat about the future. I hope this is a good sign for the future. Mal
#150064From: Richard DanielJun 1, 1994 1:51 PM
I agree totally with you. However, after all the ifs, and buts the 1400 would make some sence, wouldn`t it? —-Richard Daniel
#150723From: Kevin SangwellJun 4, 1994 7:08 AM
Richard, It would certainly be a step in the right direction, however I don't feel a big enough one for the longterm. What the industry needs is another C64 or A500 to win the hearts of three classes; 1) The buying public (most important) 2) The software developers (won't happen without no. 1) 3) The press (not essential but will help both 1 and 2) If we get this, then the Amiga may continue as an ongoing concern however to meet all three above would probraly mean significantly changing the Amiga from the machine we know and love today… Kevin 68030/40 A1200… On AutoPilot from Surrey in the UK
#150755From: Mal LansellJun 4, 1994 11:32 AM
Kevin, The Amiga as it stands is good enough to win over the people you mention – it just needs proper marketing Mal
#150901From: Mark D. ManesJun 5, 1994 12:39 AM
Kevin, Hmmm… I think I am going to disagree. Your point about "What the industry needs is another C64 or A500 to win the hearts of three classes…" makes me wonder a couple of things. 1. Can we really recapture rapture? Commodore spent it's dying breath attempting to re-create the C64. If you think about it the C64 is a once in a industry's lifetime product. How many products can you think of since the C64 that would qualify as the success of the C64 as fast as the C64 became popular? You can't say PC or Mac. The sales figures had a steady and slow growth through many different generations of product. What the C64 did was send Commodore down the road to the fast buck and the quarterly vision. If Commodore had focused on the long term, things would have been different. Commodore had three things going for them that caused the C64 boom. 1. The TIME was RIGHT. 2. Power without the price 3. State of the Art Technology The people who use computers today are not the same type of people who were looking at computers in the early 80s. The fascination in most cases is gone… computers are not considered a utility item or game system. The "age" of the home computer has grown up. The people are better educated and it takes a million times more now to impress someone than it did in 1985 or before. On to point #2. 🙂 The corporate structure of Commodore kept the second from ever happening again. Not sure you know this, but did you know that in order for a direct Commodore dealer to get a product he had to place an order with Commodore Business Machines (Commodore US). Commodore US, who had purchased inventory from Commodore International, added their profit margin on top of the margin Commodore International made on each box. By the time the dealer adds his 20-30% you have an expensive product on your hands. Dealers had no way to keep the price down. Commodore was 'cashing' in. It was fun while it lasted eh? Commodore should have taken the lead that it had with the Amiga back in 1985 and immediately start work on the next generation of the product. I am not talking A500/A2000 either. I think A500/A2000 should have been produced, but not two years after the introduction of the A1000. I guess what I am saying is that the mistake the Medhi Ali made in trying to force Commodore into the the repeat of the 64 days is the mistake you are making. The best way to stay in business is to understand the business you are in. This is something Commodore never did understand. Now before someone out there says that I am negative about the Amiga. Please understand me. I am only negative about Commodore. It is my deepest wish that the Amiga survives Commodore. I think there is a good chance that the Amiga once again will prove to be the unpredictable force if it survives Commodore. How many computer systems survive the death of the manufacturer? -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#150931From: Garry NelsonJun 5, 1994 2:51 AM
clapclapclapclapclapclap – very well thought out post – too damn bad it's the truth, though… Garry Nelson (Still waiting for the resurrection)
#150951From: Richard DanielJun 5, 1994 6:05 AM
The only problem with that Kevin is that there are now too many hardware producers out there, all with very impressive machines. Too many people buy too many different machines for a new C64 or A500. It would be fairly hard to produce such a machine today, however this is probably the goal of all the hardware producers. —Richard Daniel
#150952From: Dick SchnaseJun 5, 1994 6:17 AM
What could be an interesting sidebar. I saw a SAMSUNG ad for a variety of electronic devices ON TV!!!! Yow! Sorry
#150037From: Mario van GinnekenJun 1, 1994 11:44 AM
Wot? Another Amiga? 1000, 500, 2000, 500+, 600, 2500, 3000, 1200, 4000, don't you think they should try to sell a couple of these things? I bet there are more different Amiga-models then sold Amiga's last year… 😉 -MaRiO- -= Intel inside! (…my washing machine) =-
#150065From: Richard DanielJun 1, 1994 1:51 PM
It`s very very doubtful. —Richard Daniel
#150299From: Alex BakerJun 2, 1994 6:49 PM
>> Wot? Another Amiga? 1000, 500, 2000, 500+, 600, 2500, 3000, 1200, 4000, >> don't you think they should try to sell a couple of these things? I bet >> there are more different Amiga-models then sold Amiga's last year… 😉 Ouch! The truth hurts! <grin> What a wicked sense of humor you have. 😉
#150456From: Wes TattersJun 3, 1994 7:15 AM
My vote is for an AMIGA 4321 or maybe a AMIGA 1234. :: How's my DRIVING – 100036,174 – ON AUTOPILOT :: :: WES TATTERS, BRIZ 31, AUSTRALIA ::
#149830From: John ChangMay 31, 1994 2:05 PM
Richard, The 1400 sounds interesting, however, I really doubt if it has the marketing power to stick around. Besides, it wouldn't cost that much more to add it to the existing low cost version of the A4000, the A4000/030CR. Regards, John Chang Technical Support Manager Scala, Inc.