Best COM Prog for CG?
9 messages in this thread
Can anyone recommend a communications program that works reliably for sending
large graphics files (more than 1.3 MB TGA compressed then zipped?).
We are using an aged version of Flashlink, identical 9600 baud MNP modems on
both ends, and we usually use the Ymodem or Ymodem-Batch-G protocol. We never
have a problem with large text files, but do have difficulties with anything
larger than a basic GIF file in the realm of graphics. Someone suggested
Z-modem is a better protocol for graphics, but it's not an option with our old
software. Any recommendations for new software? We would like something that
has some kind of unattended batch capacity – so we could just start the process
late at night, and it would automatically disconnect.
Please don't suggest going via CIS! <BG> Our CIS bill last month was over $75 –
not in the budget!!! 🙁
(Whatever WinCIM uses has worked fine on my end for downloading from this
forum, but I haven't downloaded any single graphics file as big as we need to
send).
Thanks in advance for the help!
Gayle G de N
What do you mean when you say that you have "difficulties"? If your software
is set up to let the modems do the error-correction (which is a MUST for using
Y-Modem-G) then is your problem lots of re-sends due to bad blocks (maybe to
the point of aborted transfers), or are you saying that the file gets
transfered but is bad?
The use of Z-modem as a transfer protocol, regardless of the modem's ability to
error-correct and compress is fairly standard, as even though Z-modem does it's
own EC, it imposes minimal overhead, it's EC is 32-bit and very good and it has
the ability to resume interrupted downloads.
The answer's going to depend on what the actual problem is, but I'd be saving
up for a couple of the new V.Fast modems (but I'd wait till the spec is
formalized and the vendors get their products stable — I'm avoiding any of the
"We promise it'll be upgradeable to the standard" hypes). The time you'll save
with the huge throughput increase (with the parallel interface, it's what, like
318k?) ought to justify the cost if you transfer large files regularly.
Dave
Thanks for the response, Dave, I should have been more specific.
The transfers are always aborted – just a matter of time – sometimes my partner
receives "acsii garbage" on her screen, sometimes we get "bad block" messages,
sometimes it seems to be clicking along, then pauses and aborts. Sometimes
we've gotten about 80% through a large file, only to have it abort.
We're not really interested in upgrading the modems – we don't have to do these
transfers very often, also, people eager to be on the cutting edge, whether
it's modems or P-90's, have really got to be into the thrill of working out
bugs – which we definitely are not!
Can you just recommend a simple COM program that uses Z-modem and will do batch
stuff?
Thanks in advance. Gayle G de N, SAVANTES
Well, I won't claim to be a comm wizard, and I know from experience that
debugging problems in a comm link is a real pain (of course, we should all be
thankful for comm errors, as that was what Mandelbrot was working on for IBM
when he began to develop the idea of fractal dimensions).
I'd check out Angelo's suggestion. Also, I've used PCPlus for years (they have
both DOS and Windows versions, both of which are well liked, with support via
CIS) and I've heard a good thing or two about QModem's new commercial version.
By-the-by, Z-modem _is_ a batch protocol.
Dave
David –
Thanks for your suggestions, and for clarifying ther nature of
"Z-modem" … I'll check them out.
Gayle G de N
We use PROCOM PLUS from Data Storm. Somewhere around $90.00 for the DOS
version. Works fine through an icon in windows.
Zmodem works great! Good luck.
Gayle,
I downloaded a program called UNICOM from GO WINSHARE – Section #3 (Comm/Fax
prgs). Really nice and the shareware version has Z-modem. A very high-end
product with lots of options (I turned off most of the screen options .. except
the modem lights).
Its really nice and I've desceided to buy it.
Ang
Angelo –
Thanks for the suggestion on UNICOM – you didn't mention if it was Windows or
DOS (I'm getting resigned to using Windows on my "COM"-computer).
-Gayle G de N
Gayle,
>> you didn't mention if it was Windows or DOS<<
Well .. I kind'a did in an off-hand way … "in the WINSHARE section" <g>. Its
a windows prog.
Ang