CompuServe Thread

#OED Test

18 messages in this thread
#37573From: David BakerJan 21, 1993 8:37 AM
Could I impose on this forum & get someone to look up a word in the OED & copy the data to a message for me. I am trying to convince the boss that we need one for the office but haven't got there yet. Today we had discussion over whether the plural for STYLUS is STYLII or STYLUSES as his OED condensed version says. If I could get a complete printout of the word including history, etc I could show him the usefulness of the CD. Thanks in advance, Dave
#37696From: Tim EnnisJan 22, 1993 12:44 PM
David, The OED says the plurals of stylus are styluses or styli. Stylii is not acceptable. The complete entry is about four typed pages. My typing is not up to copying it and I don't have a scanner at the office. Also my access to the OED is by a standalone independent on-line service so I cannot make an electronic copy to my hard disk. BTW, what business are you in that allows the leisure to debate the plural of stylus? Are you in a monastery or a government office? Oh well, time to order some more styli from the Supply Room.<G> Regards, Tim
#37702From: Dave WoolcockJan 22, 1993 3:40 PM
Tim you mean that this wonderful OED product can't send output to a file rather than a printer??? dw
#38010From: Tim EnnisJan 25, 1993 12:05 PM
Dave, I tried to indicate in my reply that my access to the OED was on a standalone mainframe which I access by a remote terminal not a PC. The program has a different interface than the OED on CD. From what I've heard of the OED CD, it allows you to print files and to transfer data to other apps.
#37728From: Jim ClementsJan 22, 1993 10:54 PM
RE: "BTW, what business are you in that allows the leisure to debate the plural of stylus? Are you in a monastery or a government office?" Odd, Tim, when I looked up monastery in my OED I it said: "A place of great silence, mysticism and contemplation of concepts beyond the understanding of mere mortals. See government office."
#37790From: David BakerJan 23, 1993 5:45 AM
Tim, pardon my spelling error there – I did mean styli or styluses. Seems strange that a word can have 2 valid plurals! If you get 4 pages on a word such as this, it sounds like this OED will be worth it. I am actually in a survey company in Malaysia. The styli (styluses?) we use are in echo-sounders that we use to measure water depths when doing oil exploration. Malaysia is an ex-British colony & has a British education system & spelling, but Microsoft refuses to accept this. Our version of Word for Windows has an American dictionary & I have been unable to get anyone from Microsoft to admit guilt & send us a free English dictionary. Our old Word 5.0 had both! I guess this is the price we must pay for progress? Thanks for the info anyway, if I tell the boss I can give him 4 pages on the subject I may be able to sway him. Dave
#38012From: Tim EnnisJan 25, 1993 12:06 PM
Dave, It's not at all uncommon for a word to have variant acceptable spellings, particularly if it comes directly from the Latin or other foreign language. TYhe beauty of the OED is that it is a historical dictionary as opposed to a normative or prescriptive dictionary like Webster's, and one can see how the meaing and spelling of words vary over time. Styli is the latin plural of stylus a direct english borrowing from Latin. Consequently, up until 30 years ago that would be recognized as the proper plural of any educated person who had even taken a year of Latin. Styluses represents the application of the standard english way of denoting plurals to a nonenglish word. Since few people now have Latin it will tend to have greater currency. That's probably why your dictionary probably doesn't list styli. Eventually it will be listed as an archaic use. As to legnth of entries, you'll find that The OED has the longest entries for the simplest words which tend to have the longest histories. Newer hybrid words tend to have much shorter entries, though still long compared to regular dictionaries. Regards, Tim
#38171From: David BakerJan 27, 1993 8:19 AM
Tim, they always told me Latin was a dead language & a waste of time learning. I did it for 5 years anyway because there were only 2 of us in the class & the other guy was a genius so the teacher could spend all his time on me! It's a pity that these plurals are being butchered, but that's the difference between a "living" & a "dead" language I guess. Probably British English will go the same way from what I read – the British are about to concede defeat on the spelling of some of their words: colour/color, center/centre, etc. Microsoft is helping them along the way by not including "English" dictionaries in it's word processors sold in Malaysia (where I am) these days!
#38213From: Larry LandJan 27, 1993 5:58 PM
David…Are there that many spelling differences between American and English that a separate dictionary is needed or is it just a convenience? -Larry
#38309From: David BakerJan 28, 1993 4:20 AM
Larry, I guess there must be over 100 differences & possibly up to 500 or more. In the past (Word 5.0) there use to be 2 dictionaries (AM.LEX & BR.LEX) for spell-checking, but now we only get the American one in Malaysia. I guess it's the principle more than anything – being half a "Pom" (British) myself & living in a country that teaches "English", but having Microsoft tell us that we can only buy it's products with American dictionaries. I don't actually know if there is any book that highlights the difference in spelling & words between the 2 "languages". For example we never use the word "fall" as a season, we use "autumn". Then there is "ketchup" (or is that "catsup"?), where we always say "tomato sauce". That's before we even get into the spelling differences like metre/meter, centre/center, etc. I am able to put the "correct" spellings into a custom dictionary, but there seems to be no way to get rid of the "incorrect" spellings from the standard dictionary, so if we do spell it incorrectly the word is not picked up. That's enough complaining for one day, hope I haven't bored you! Dave.
#38365From: Larry LandJan 28, 1993 6:18 PM
David…Yes I can see where the American dictionary would be just enough of a pain to make the English version preferable. Be seeing you. -Larry
#38550From: David BakerJan 30, 1993 9:37 AM
Larry, the main problem is…after using Word for Windows for 6 months now, I'm beginning to forget which is the correct spelling, English or American! A word comes up & I have to look at it 3 or 4 times before taking action. Dave.
#38403From: Mark K. RobertsJan 28, 1993 10:33 PM
Guys, some more spelling, not vocabulary, diferrences are the color/our defense/ce, gray/ey curb/kerb et. al. using a a grammar checking (though obviously not in this correspondece!) I'm told that "lift" or elevator in limese is a verb and other useful tips. Goes back to the old saw of"… two countries divided by a common language"
#38355From: Tim EnnisJan 28, 1993 3:51 PM
Dave, I'm a fellow Latin student, also Greek the rmance languages and a bit of German. Did Churchill say we are two peoples divided by a common language? It would be a shame to see the English give way on this. I was taught that the English monarch owned the language and all the ships in the navy. Thats why they say the Queen's English and HMS. BTW, who could officially give up for the English as you have no royal academy. When I read the financial times they use the same spellings and the American edition of the Economist also uses British terms and expressions. The OED lists the American spelling honor, e.g. but refers the reader to the article under the British spelling honour. The OEED notes both spellings were used up to the 1700's and that the 1623 Shakespear Folio uses honor twice as frequent as honour. While British writers were settling into the preferred use of -our ans -re as endings in the end of the 18th, beginning of the 19th century, the American Noah Webster and others aggressively pushed the alternative spelllings for patriotic reasons of establishing cultural independence from the former mother country. No doubt it also helped sell American dictionaries without competition from the London publishers.<g> I have not heard complaints from anyone in Britain that Microsoft doesn't supply a Bitish Lexicon with their product. I would assume the reason they won't supply you the lexicon is because you probably have an American edition which may sell more cheaply than the product they sell in Britain<g>. I would think you should be able to find a third party add-on somewhere. Regards, Tim
#38549From: David BakerJan 30, 1993 9:37 AM
Tim, I was going to quote something spectacular in Latin, but might embarrass myself so I won't – haven't actually opened a Latin textbook for 14 years! We didn't have Greek in our school, just Latin, French or German. Nowadays it's Japanese or Indonesian which makes a lot more sense geographically (I'm an Australian, in case I hadn't mentioned). I guess your quote about the Queen owning all the ships & the language says it all – now the Americans own all the ships & the language is heading that way as well. The OED is the last bastion of the language! Here in Malaysia, 90% of dictionaries are Oxford variations (we can buy American ones for comparison) & all schools teach the British spelling. I was just peeved that Microsoft Malaysia refuses to even discuss the matter – they just say "take it or leave it". From conversations in PACFORUM I believe they have done the same thing in Australia. I'm not against having all these languages (in the middle of learning Cantonese & Malay at the moment – can speak reasonable Thai, though I've given up on trying to write it), just don't like getting unsuitable products dumped on us. We get the same problems with dates in a lot of software here – Americans use Month/Day/Year while we use Day/Month/Year. I was pretty happy with Windows in that you can set your Dates to the format you like, but I recently tried some Windows software (can't remember the name) that ignored system settings & forced me to use mm/DD/YY – threw the software away in frustration! Dave
#38590From: Tim EnnisJan 30, 1993 4:16 PM
Dave, Sounds like you have your hands full with all those languages. I don't have any immediate plans to study new ones, but would like to take a trip to Europe soon to get a chance for more practice, particularly French. Tim
#38611From: David BakerJan 30, 1993 10:08 PM
Tim, that's the secret – keeping yourself exposed to the language. The French I did in school was wasted because I have never been near France or known anyone who spoke French (except my Mum – she has just gone back to school to learn French again – at 51!). I find Malay quite easy now, because I work with 60 Malays & we can practise all the time. I only want to learn Cantonese so I can find out what the girls are talking about when I go for haircuts! Actually my girlfriend's parents are Chinese & don't speak a word of English so I had better learn eventually. Dave.
#38639From: Dave WoolcockJan 31, 1993 6:11 AM
Who says the British are about to concede defeat on spellings. we most certainly are NOT! the only thing we seem to have given way on is the american billion 10^9 instead of 10^12. dw