CompuServe Thread

#Howdy!

18 messages in this thread
#220From: Jeff FirestoneJul 16, 1988 12:41 PM
Howdy! The new forum split seems to be a GOOD idea! I can't wait to try them all! jeff
#221From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPJul 16, 1988 2:04 PM
Hi Jeff – glad you approve of the forum split. We think it will be more efficient and helpful to our members. It also affords us 3x the space for messages and data libraries. Enjoy all 3 – we're here if you need us. Marlene
#230From: Lee SheldonJul 16, 1988 4:37 PM
Marlene, The three new sections are great, and Whap! came along at exactly the right time to exploit them. But where are Ben and Henry fighting now? I can't seem to locate the subtopic… Lee
#236From: Doug WingerJul 16, 1988 6:38 PM
Lee, I think they opened a Forum just for them. Try GO RINGSIDE. 8) Doug
#248From: Lee SheldonJul 17, 1988 2:31 AM
hehehe!
#253From: Bob NaffzigerJul 17, 1988 8:18 AM
Maybe Henry went back to the minors (same place his can do no wrong WP should be).
#275From: Lee SheldonJul 17, 1988 5:28 PM
Bob, Well, Wordperfect is the only word processor for the Amiga that does what -I- need a word processor to do. It has its faults, but it also has no competition. Lee P.S. Bet you weren't expecting THAT reply. 8)
#283From: Bob NaffzigerJul 17, 1988 8:13 PM
I'am glad it does what you want, but why not own a clone? Nothing could hurt the AMIGA more than ports of MSDOS software. If its my business I want the real thing. However if you want more than what MSDOS gives and you can get your work done on the AMIGA – great. I would own a MAC and be using WORD if I was in your shoes. What will WP do that EXCELLENCE! or DesignText does not? Bob Naffziger(Vivid Copy) PS. I use Scribble! and Professional Page.
#288From: Lee SheldonJul 18, 1988 1:04 AM
Bob, I own an IBM. <shudder, gasp> Wordstar is my word processor of choice on that, although I'm looking into Sprint. As for nothing hurting the Amiga more than ports of MS-DOS software, I don't see it. With Wordperfect Amiga I can write a file that can be translated and manipulated in the MS-DOS world. Like it or not, that's the world than runs most aspects of my industry. And I CERTAINLY wouldn't use an MS-DOS port on a Mac! Word is a wonderful program if you don't mind using three key strokes where one will do. I'm currently looking into Excellence with Ben Blish's kind intervention. But right now it looks like it slows way down in long documents. I write 50+ to 120+ page documents. What does WP do that DesighText doesn't? I don't know. You tell me. Does DesignText allow complex stringing and imbedded of macros that can also pause for user imput (text strings) before proceeding? WP does. Easily. And despite other people having problems, I've never lost a word or crashed a disk. ProWrite is lots of fun, but has no macro capability whatsoever. Scribble reminds me of a spayed Wordstar. It may be okay as a casual word processor (I used it for awhile to cut and paste message replies into Online!), but it falls short in too many <continued>
#291From: John Sobernheim(TCR)Jul 18, 1988 2:01 AM
>With Wordperfect Amiga I can write a file that can be translated and >manipulated in the MS-DOS world. I can do it in 3 words; copy * ram:junk Lee, There are many formats for interchange of documents, ascii being the most popular. Most if not all of the Amiga word processors will allow you to take the resulting text out in ascii format for the reason that you can then take it to other software or other computers that can import ascii documents. Word Perfect has nothing special about it in this area. -John
#312From: Lee SheldonJul 19, 1988 12:53 AM
John, I'm fully aware of importing and exporting ASCII documents. I do it all the time. But for the most part I write lengthy, heavily formatted documents that must be easily editable by my secretary on the other end of a long distance telephone call. She's sitting at an IBM because that's what Universal Studios, and most other Hollywood production companies have standardized on. She has a choice of Wordstar, Word, or Wordperfect. Since I WANT to work on an Amiga, rather than an IBM, I have ONE choice: Wordperfect. The file structure is exactly the same, and requires NO additional translation for her to work on it. This is not the only solution available to us, but it is by far the easiest. Okay? Lee
#308From: Bob NaffzigerJul 18, 1988 6:32 PM
Lee This started because I took a shot at Henry. I'am glad you like WP & think you are a very smart person to own an AMIGA. Rule #1 in buying systems is: find the very best for your needs, then ask what hardware it runs on. If you like ports of MSDOS software I will give you a great deal on Rags-to-Riches accounting or DBman. Ports hurt the AMIGA. I will support products from companies like NEW-TEK, Gold Disk, ASDG and C-LTD. Let's get off talking about WP & wordprocessing. If you want to debate ports fire away. Bob Naffziger (Vivid Copy)
#314From: Lee SheldonJul 19, 1988 12:54 AM
Bob, You asked me why I didn't use another Amiga word processor. I was trying to explain. If I got carried away, sorry. I dislike direct ports as much as you do. But as I gradually move my work from the IBM to the Amiga, I don't mind easing the transition whenever I can. Sometimes file compatibility is necessary. I don't want to retype hundreds of pages of scripts. I DO have a major database to transfer once I get a 2000 and hard disk. Since I use dBase III Plus on the IBM, I've considered DBman. Actually I like Microfiche Filer, and am hoping their public domain import/ export module will handle it for me. I haven't looked at it yet since I won't need it until I have the hard disk. I'm still looking for a decent home finance package to replace Managing Your Money. There isn't one on the Amiga. Phaser (another port) comes closest. Ports rarely access the best features of the new machine. But they can sell more machines to people who want to leave their old computers behind, and move up to an Amiga. Lee
#289From: Lee SheldonJul 18, 1988 1:04 AM
<continuation> areas to mention. And it's a port, too, after all… I process words for a living, desktop publish occasionally for fun. WP also works with most Amiga publishing programs including yours and mine, Publisher Plus. Lee
#254From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPJul 17, 1988 9:04 AM
<grin> – maybe we should have gotten a 4th forum just for them!
#276From: Lee SheldonJul 17, 1988 5:28 PM
Marlene, As long as they can still find each other, I'm happy. 8) Lee
#307From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPJul 18, 1988 3:27 PM
Lee, if you get line noise while switching forums – you'll know they've met somewhere in between <grin>
#313From: Lee SheldonJul 19, 1988 12:53 AM
8)