CompuServe Thread

#Whap

8 messages in this thread
#993From: Karl SparklinJul 18, 1988 8:26 AM
Yes, I was speaking of original messages: simply a bad habit I must break, although Larry reminded me that the Amiga keys will front-to-back me if I'm "stupid" again. <grin>. Am I right in assuming that the "R" flag that appears after collecting messages only works on RTN, such that if I collect headers only, I will have to bounce out of Whap to check them out. (I'm afraid I just can't afford to DL all messages in topics I'm intereseted in. Historically, I've only done QS to check for items of interest, and then done RI. Which, of course, falls apart when people start chatting about Star Trek in the middle of a memory expansion thread) This is the only stumbling block I have with Whap so far, and I suspect I'm just not clear on the concept that drove its creation. Do most folks "dump" the entire message base every few days? Thanks, in advance, for clarifying, Karl
#994From: Jul 18, 1988 8:52 AM
Karl, The R gadget will be highlighted after a RTN is done if indeed there are new messages. If you use QSN there currently isn't a visual indication. Click on the M gadget to see and mark the headers. By selecting the sections you are interested in and doing an RTN, Whap! is much faster than manually doing a QSN then RI. You can now get all of the messages in your selected sections. This helps you get information that you otherwise would not have gotten because the subject had drifted. A subject header of "Thanks for the help" may have drifted into a technical discussion of a subject you are interested in but because the header no longer reflected the true subject you may have bypassed it. With RTN, you will get and still save considerably on connect time over doing what you did manually (and still not getting that thread). Best, -jcs-
#1041From: Doug WingerJul 18, 1988 3:07 PM
Karl, I've tried QSN and, unless you have the most narrow of interests, RTN has it beat all hollow. It may seem tha QSN is cheaper at first look, but you have to log on TWICE to read those you're interested in. You also might miss the things you're looking for as the headers do not always pertain to the content. Since a RTN takes about an average of two and a half minutes per forum at 1200 baud (unless you're hitting the _really_ busy forums 8) doing a daily run into CIS for messages becomes quite economical with Whap!. If you have 2400 baud capabilities it makes even more sense. My sessions online (icluding _very_ busy forums) take about ten minutes when hitting ALL my forums of interest. Considering that 'slow' forums take about thirty seconds to do, and the busy ones perhaps two minutes, the cost of a daily swoop-and-scoop of the bases costs about $2.04. And that's when you get it ALL, with all subjects set. At 2400, the price drops even more! So, impress your friends! Become an instant expert! For the lesser part of a half a sawbuck, you too can rampage, sack, pillage and loot the various SIGs of CIS! Come on! Do it today! 8) Doug
#1051From: Art LewisJul 18, 1988 4:03 PM
I agree with what you say in principle, Doug… but I think your figures are a little misleading. I did a RTN of AmigaTech capturing ONLY messages in 16 (WHAP!) this morning after having cleared the board at about noon yesteokrday. -qT it took 3 minutes. The average 'sweep' of Gamers takes about four or five minutes. It's STILL the most economical way of doing things (and I agree the headers all tend to say the same thing and give little information about the content)…but I would figure on 5 minutes or so per session. BTW that was at 2400 baud. Art Lewis
#1112From: Henry ColonnaJul 18, 1988 6:51 PM
Good advice, Doug – even if AmigaForum SYSOPS got very picky about subject/message titles, other forums wouldn't necessarily be guaranteed to do so.
#1259From: Richard Rae/SYSOPJul 19, 1988 8:06 AM
<Chuckle> And how much of a Whap!back are YOU getting? 😉 Rick
#1382From: Doug WingerJul 19, 1988 7:36 PM
Psst! Wanna buy a chicken? Or a duck? 8)
#1488From: C. Davey UtterJul 20, 1988 7:08 AM
Doug, Now I'VE got ducks, 13 of 'em, 3 weeks old, born in my yard, tramping around my house, browbeating my cat. You wanna talk ducks?!?! …Dave