CompuServe Thread

#Workbench 2.0 HELP

14 messages in this thread
#110461From: JDJun 30, 1990 2:09 AM
Maybe some other users that are using 2.0 can help me out a little…. I have seen pics of 2.0 with 3d type front/back/close gadgets… my versionn does not have these….. I have tried using the background wbpatterns and I cant seem to get the program to work. I can save or choose the use ons and I still do not get any patterns…. even when rebooting…. what gives ? Is there an IFF viewer that allows a window to be opened and resized instead of a whole screen ? I have seen a pic of wb2.0 and a nagel picture in a window ….. Id like to know how to do that. Thanks in advance
#110472From: Brian MaguireJun 30, 1990 8:15 AM
You may have a defective copy of 2.0. My version does not have 3D front/back/close gadgets — or at least not what I'd call 3D. However, the background patterns work just fine. Is everything else on your copy functioning properly? What is your version number? Mine is 36.68. -Brian
#110482From: Bill ThompsonJun 30, 1990 10:22 AM
what's the deal.. I thought 2.0 wasn't available yet. If it is I'd surely like to know how to get a copy… Bill
#110507From: Mike SchillerJun 30, 1990 3:13 PM
Bill: Well, it's sort of available… If you want a copy of it, you'll have to buy an Amiga 3000, or wait untill September when it gets released for the 2000, and who knows when it'll get released for the 500! -Mike Schiller In sunny Fort Lauderdale
#110514From: Brian MaguireJun 30, 1990 5:48 PM
2.0 is now shipping with 3000s. I don't think it will be sold seperately until September, when it is supposed to be genuinely final. -Brian
#110680From: Bill ThompsonJul 1, 1990 10:18 PM
thanx, that was my understanding, and I will just wait with baited breath until it is officially released. IF I did buy a 3000, would I be able to run 2.0 on my 2000, or would I need the 2.0 rom set? Just curious, I doubt I'll upgrade this time unless I find a really pressing reason, or a lot of discretionary cash… Bill
#110726From: Brian MaguireJul 2, 1990 7:35 AM
I think you could run it on your 2000. The 3000 comes with Kickstart 2.0 on disk as well as in ROM. -Brian
#110744From: Matthew J. W. RatcliffJul 2, 1990 11:33 AM
I SERIOUSLY doubt you could get 2.0 to run on a 2000 from the disks you get with a 3000 How would you disable the 1.3 ROMs? tell the 2000 to look on a floppy for kickstart?? It would be w\quicker to wait for september! ;>
#110757From: Brian MaguireJul 2, 1990 4:51 PM
Good point. I had forgotten the 2000 automatically looks to the ROMs, since the 3000 appears to default to the floppy if a Kickstart is there. At least that's the only explanation I have for the fact that it appears to load KS from disk if you have one in df0:. Kickstart loaded that way takes up a different amount of memory from KS from ROM. (Or am I totally misinformed here?) In any event, thanks for the correction on running on a 2000. I'll be sure not to misinform anyone else! 🙂 -Brian
#110783From: Bill ThompsonJul 2, 1990 8:36 PM
I did a little more digging, and here is what I found… The 3000 has a very small KS which is used to load the KS off the disk into RAM. THis is why it seems to take up so much room. If you have a MMU ( either the one built in to the 030 or the chip that works with the 020 ) you could conceivably run 2.0 on a 2000. I suspect I will wait till September, I am just too lazy to play with that stuff… Bill
#110829From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJul 3, 1990 1:40 AM
Bill, Without going into the gory details (because I can't), I can tell you that it is possible to run v2.0 on a plain jane A2000 without changin the ROM. It requires specialized software (NOT the software that comes with the A3000) and extra memory. Don
#110488From: JDJun 30, 1990 11:39 AM
Mine is 36.10 I cant see that it would make that much of a difference since they are really close to each other. I might not understand how to make the background patterns work correctly. I load the wbpattern, draw the pattern, select SAVE from the window (not the pulldown menus) and then it writes to the disk. Maybe my startup seq is incorrect or something…….
#110516From: Brian MaguireJun 30, 1990 5:48 PM
I just did exactly that, and it worked fine. I am using the stock startup-sequence that came with 2.0, with the addition of assigns for 3DPro. It's a mystery to me. -Brian
#110767From: Betty Clay/SYSOPJul 2, 1990 5:16 PM
JD, We have a full name policy in AmigaForum. Please go to the Forum! prompt, type OPT, select NAME, and type both your first and last names. Thanks. ……Betty