CompuServe Thread

#DeskJet output

12 messages in this thread
#35469From: david holtJun 28, 1990 3:20 PM
How does the output from a DeskJet compare with a 300dpi impact printer. I'm currently using a NEC P2200 which has a graphics resolution of 300dpi but prints dots which are significantly larger than 1/300 of an inch. The net effect is, the output doesn't look like 300dpi… Is the dot size for the DeskJet more in line with a true 300dpi printer? I've been told that its output rivals that of the LazerJet. Is this true?
#35472From: Thomas HoladayJun 28, 1990 4:10 PM
The DeskJet's output rivals the LaserJet. The 4-point font (supplied) I use for the crueler parts of contracts is quite legible, if you use a magnifying glass, so the dots must be fairly small and tidy. The main curse on the DeskJet is that its ink is water-soluable, so rain, tears, spittle, etc. can rinse it right off the page.
#35482From: david holtJun 29, 1990 12:14 AM
Thanks for the reply. That's just the type of info I was looking for. Everyone else I've talked to has just said "it looks good". A legible 4pnt font is something I can relate to.
#35487From: Thomas HoladayJun 29, 1990 8:06 AM
A correction: the DeskJet Plus comes with a 5-point fixed-width font standard. The 4-point Times Roman I use comes on the P cartridge. Also, the appearance of any water-based ink's dots is going to vary with the paper onto which they drip. Although I haven't tried it, I imagine the coarse yellow stuff we used to water-color on in Art Class would yield surreal effects. Good for printing the Necronimicon!
#35489From: Allen MittsJun 29, 1990 9:21 AM
David, When I went looking for a printer, I compared the output of a DeskJet+ and the HP IIP (InkJet vs. Laser). There was a differnece and I could see it. The printing on the IIP seemed a little crisper and cleaner. Not by much though. I ended up buying the DeskJet+ and really love it. I have since found out that the print quality on the DeskJet will vary depending on the type of paper you use. I've been using a heavy stock with beautiful results. I do not regret getting the DJ+. My only complaint with it is that the ink is water soluable (sp?) which means that anytime the page gets wet, the ink will run or smear. Not great for doing mailing labels 🙂 Hope that helps… Regards, Allen
#35508From: Paul GerhardtJun 30, 1990 6:59 AM
David, I agree with all that's been said. But as a side note a friend of mine who is a Computer Factory sales rep (they are HP dealers) said that HP is coming out with a new ink cartridge for the DJ+ that will use ink that not water soluble. -Paul-
#35540From: david holtJul 1, 1990 1:50 PM
Thanks Paul (and everyone else who replied) for the DeskJet+ info. It sounds better all the time!
#35554From: Tom CattrallJul 1, 1990 5:01 PM
David– I have an NEC P2200, and an HP IIP. About the same time I got the HP, a friend got a DeskJet. When we discovered that we'd both made printer purchases, we compared output quality. Both the DJ or IIP look a lot better than the P2200. At its best (with the right paper), the DJ looks almost as good as the IIP. But the DJ can look pretty bad with the wrong paper. The IIP looks great with darn near anything you feed into it. The best paper to use with the DJ turns out to be high quality laser printer paper. Both Hammermill Laser Print and Nekoosa Laser 1000 work well. My friend is very envious of the IIP and now refuses to look at anything I've printed on it because it makes him mad that he got the DJ when he could have got the IIP for $200 more. If your needs change in the future, you can add postscript to the IIP (I have already done so), but the DJ has no such upgrade path. Hope this helps, Tom
#35560From: Mike SchillerJul 1, 1990 10:58 PM
Tom: The DJ vs the IIP is a good arguement. Both have advantages, and disadvantages. The DJ has the advantage that it doesn't need lots of internal memory to do anything, as where the IIP needs more memory in order to do much with full page graphics (adding cost to the IIP). The DJ otoh doesn't have a Postscript cartridge available for it, so you need to use a software PS interpeter if you need PS output. -Mike Schiller In sunny Fort Lauderdale
#35632From: david holtJul 3, 1990 7:01 AM
Thanks Tom. I took advantage of the HP rebate program and got a DeskJet Plus. Everyone was right, the output looks great. Thanks for the tip on paper for it. Just on a limited trial I've noticed what a difference different paper can make.
#35965From: Allen MittsJul 8, 1990 6:12 PM
Hi Tom, Where could your friend get a IIP for $200 more than a DJ+? The DJ+ is going for around $450 street price these days (rebate from HP). When I was looking at the IIP, I figured it was gonna cost me around $1200-$1300 with the extra memory (which is needed, no?). Regards, Allen
#36175From: Tom CattrallJul 12, 1990 10:54 PM
Allen– We made our purchases last December. At the time, IIP's had just dropped to the $950 range, and DJ+'s were $750. My friend lives next door to a guy that works at HP designing DJ's. When he told the HP guy what I'd got my IIP for, the HP guy was shocked and made the comment that they'd better do something or the DJ sales would drop fast. Apparently the rebate (of which I was unaware) is the result. How much is the rebate? I just looked at some prices in the latest Computer Shopper. IIP's are just about the same price (lowest I saw was $919), but DJ's have dropped about $100 (lowest around $649). The rebate would widen the gap. You are right that depending on how you plan to use it, the IIP may require that you spend more for additional memory. Anyone buying a IIP without allowing for that could be disappointed. Tom