CompuServe Thread

#Online GIF

13 messages in this thread
#106101From: Steve AhlstromJul 4, 1993 8:27 PM
There does not appear to be an Amiga terminal program that supports online viewing of GIF pictures (weather maps, trends, .GIF files in forum libraries, etc.). Is there a need for this? If you say yes, don't say so because it would be a "gee whiz" feature — would you use it? -sja
#106102From: Bill EastburnJul 4, 1993 9:18 PM
Steve, Very rarely. It would be slower than downloading and using the Amiga's multi-tasking capabilities to view the image. So, it would be mainly a convenience factor in the rare instances when I'd want to see something online. Bill, K3OZM "Go CALFORUM"
#106122From: Steve AhlstromJul 5, 1993 12:33 AM
Bill, At 9600 baud, using an '030, doing a realtime GIF display will give you the same thruput (approx 960) as a straight download. So, unless you're CPU bound, there is no speed penalty.
#106127From: Bill EastburnJul 5, 1993 1:46 AM
Steve, I'm probably way off base, but the way I understand it, a GIF file must be decoded line by line (a variation of the LZ system.) The decoding takes a discernable amount of time, hence it would be slower. Of course, if you download the file and begin decoding while the download is in progress, the download time wouldn't be affected, but the viewing time would be longer than the download process. (Did I confuse myself yet?) Shows how much techie stuff I know. 🙂 Bill, K3OZM "Go CALFORUM"
#106131From: Steve AhlstromJul 5, 1993 2:00 AM
Bill, You are offbase — but, thru no fault of yours. Ya see, I've already written the code and tested it extensively — so I know the numbers hold up (at least on an A3000 and A4000). Using those machines, the decoding and display is fast enough to not affect through-put at 9600 baud.
#106172From: Steve AhlstromJul 5, 1993 12:41 PM
Bill, Well, let me back off a bit on what I said before. Display speed depends on a variety of things — the way a particular GIF picture was saved, the width of the pic, and the number of bit planes in the pic. Typically, the lower the res and fewer the bitplanes, the longer it will take to display. (The following observation is based on a 9600 connect). If there are multiple lines to be displayed per 1k block from the BPlus transfer, the slower it will be. As an example, when viewing a 640 x 480 256 color pic, that translates into about 1.5 scan lines of display per 1k block. For that type of pic, I've been getting a thruput of about 960 cps (you can't get the next block until the current block is displayed). However, if the pic is a 1 bit plane (2 color) that could translate to 10 to 20 scan lines of display to be done before the next block can be gotten, so you could get an effective cps of 300-400. These pics are the exception and relatively rare — the vast majority of online pics are 16 or 256 color. It's interesting to note that the higher the color density the faster the transfer/display. -sja
#106112From: Jonathan HirschmanJul 4, 1993 10:29 PM
Steve, Online support for picture viewing is something that I use on only the rarest occasions using WinCIM; I could not imagine using it all with Autopilot. Obviously, someone has suggested putting this in…perhaps if Autopilot had more CIM-like features, it could be a good idea. As it stands, it seems pretty useless to me. //Jonathan, \\//via AutoPilot
#106113From: Christopher TolmieJul 4, 1993 10:30 PM
Steve, I would use it, especially if it allows one to save the realtime displayed image for later use. I use WINCIM or PROCOM PLUS for WINDOWS to download realtime weather satellite images at work all the time. Christopher
#106116From: Betty Clay/SYSOPJul 4, 1993 11:54 PM
Steve, I doubt that I, personally, would use the GIF feature even if it were available. However, we seem to be constantly explaining to people that "this feature is not available for the Amiga, but you can just download the GIF and view it while the next one is downloading." The request for the feature shows up here quite often. —Betty
#106135From: Brian BartlettJul 5, 1993 4:27 AM
Steve, yes. Now that FinalCopy II/Release II supports type 1 fonts, I intend to "rape" the FontBank, but I find that actual mechanics of downloading the .GIF file, viewing it, grab the next, and repeat process to be tedious, at best. There are also certain other .GIF files that would be best utilized in the view and dispose mode, such as weather maps. Just a thought. Brian
#106181From: Sean LallyJul 5, 1993 1:17 PM
Steve, I doubt I would use it much but, if you put it in AP then you wouldn't have to tell all the people that want it that, 'No, it doesn't support that feature." I think people see more features and regardless of whether or not they use it, it becomes a selling point. -Sean
#106192From: Richard EricksonJul 5, 1993 1:57 PM
I would use the weather map feature without a doubt. Richard -> via the Amiga 1000 AutoPilot
#106298From: Steve SetzerJul 6, 1993 4:07 PM
Steve, I would use the GIF feature, albeit rarely, wathermaps come to mind. For me it would be kind of a "gee whiz" feature, but would see some limited use. And I hate explaining to my dos friends something else the amiga can't do. …Steve ====>>> Motorola 68030 Inside <<<====