CompuServe Thread

#Amiga UNIX

39 messages in this thread
#41065From: Steve AhlstromMay 17, 1994 8:19 PM
I just ordered the latest (and last) version of the unlimited user license Amiga UNIX (hey, for $120 it'll be a nice toy to play with). What comes with it? C compiler? Decent manuals? Or do I just get a tape? What?
#41070From: Dale LarsonMay 18, 1994 7:54 AM
C compiler is on the tape along with TCP/IP, UUCP, X, etc. Manuals are pretty useless (pretty and written for a rank beginner). Its pretty lousy as a toy. It really wants to be run 24hours a day on its own machine with a large HD. — Dale L. Larson, Intangible Assets Manufacturing
#41079From: Peter WadeMay 18, 1994 5:04 PM
Since you seem to know about this, I hope you won't mind me jumping in with a few questions. Is this a System V Unix ? Will it work with a 68030EC or does it need the memory manager ? How large a hard disc would you recommend for a non-networked developement system ? Peter Wade Autopiloting from London, England
#41090From: Dale LarsonMay 19, 1994 7:22 AM
Yes. No, yes. A development system wants huge disk. More than a gig. The more the merrier. A full OS install takes 250megs. — Dale L. Larson, Intangible Assets Manufacturing
#41103From: Peter WadeMay 19, 1994 4:42 PM
Thanks for the info. It sounds like too much for my 500+ and GVP. If I want Unix at home I'll just have to stick to Minix and shuffling floppy discs. Peter Wade Autopiloting from London, England
#41081From: Steve AhlstromMay 18, 1994 5:38 PM
Dale, Thanks for the info. Why would an OS "want to be run 24hours a day"? Does it get cranky if it doesn't? That's rather like saying a lawn mower wants to cut grass 24 hours a day … both are inanimate and have no wants or desires. What classifies as a toy is very subjective, no?
#41091From: Dale LarsonMay 19, 1994 7:23 AM
It wants to be run 24hrs because shutting the thing down and bringing it up takes a long time. You can't just turn it off without potentially damaging the disk and certainly causing a very long startup on the next book (fsck). Besides, what is most useful about Unix is what it does automatically and on a network. Yeah, "toy" is very subjective. — Dale L. Larson, Intangible Assets Manufacturing
#41092From: SyndesisMay 19, 1994 8:51 AM
Spoken like an employee who doesn't pay the electric bills. :-0
#41117From: Dale LarsonMay 20, 1994 5:16 AM
I get the electric bills. Also, at some point, the wear on a computer from powering up and down (quite stressful electrically and thermally) costs more to the environent than the electricity to just leave it on. Unfortunately, manufacturing computer stuff is one of the least environementally sound things that we (humans) do. All those yucky solvents in chip manufacturing and board production. Drives, for example, may last twice as long if they are on 24hrs as if they are regularly power-cycled (some warranties even reflect this now). So, contrary to intuition, for many people it may be more environmentally sound to leave the machines on 24hrs/day. — Dale L. Larson, Intangible Assets Manufacturing
#41146From: SyndesisMay 22, 1994 10:40 PM
I thought it was kind of silly to justify leaving a computer on 24 hours because it takes several minutes to boot… I know you pay the electric bills. 🙂 As for power-cycling and thermal cycling, how does the MBTF really balance against the expected useful life of the computer? It may not matter in some situations. Resale values are bad enough that no one cares if the computer was cycled or not.
#41151From: Dale LarsonMay 23, 1994 5:03 AM
Not just that it takes several minutes to boot — also that most of the things that an Amix box are useful for are a heck of a lot simpler that way. Mail and NFS, for example. Big pain in the butt to walk into the other room and turn on a machine and wait any time I want to get mail or a file. Even if the machine stops being useful to you and has little resale value, there are still plenty of people it would be useful to for many years to come. People in schools, perhaps, or in third-world nations for certain. There are plenty of programs to which you can sent your "ancient" technology for recycling. — Dale L. Larson, Intangible Assets Manufacturing
#41849From: David GillespieJul 15, 1994 1:42 AM
You obviously don't live in Florida! 24 hr operation invites a lightning zap! It has killed my A2000 once even with a surge protector and that is enough for me
#41850From: Dale LarsonJul 15, 1994 8:56 AM
That's what IsoBars are for. If you keep good backups anyway… you get a free new computer even if lightning strikes (up to $10,000). Dale L. Larson Intangible Assets Manufacturing (info@iam.com) "That's the best part about being crazy. You see things no one else can see."
#41863From: Eulogio (DJ) GarciaJul 15, 1994 11:38 PM
I spent five years in Melbourne, Florida. Yes, I'm familiar with Florida Flicker and Flash. DJ
#41885From: Mike SchillerJul 17, 1994 3:23 AM
David: I live in Florida (Fort Lauderdale), and I leave both my Amiga & my PC on 24 hours a day. So far I've never been hit by lightning, and I've been doing this for at least 4 years or more! Of course it might just be that you're more prone to lightening than I am, I live in a condo, what sort of structure is your Amiga located in? Oh, and a good UPS also helps, I have more brown-outs here than I do power interuptions. // -Mike Schiller \X/ AMIGA! On AutoPilot in sunny Fort Lauderdale
#41906From: Eulogio (DJ) GarciaJul 19, 1994 11:25 PM
Mike, if you have a UPS you most probably don't need a surge protector, as most UPSs today cover that end too. DJ My Sweet Amiga /-\/-\ As personable as Cindy, \ — / As kicking as Arnold …
#41094From: Steve AhlstromMay 19, 1994 10:31 AM
>> You can't just turn it off without potentially damaging the disk Say what? How about some details on this. Are you saying that UNIX causes hardware to be less reliable than other operating systems? What does software have to do with hardware?
#41099From: Jim Nangano/SYSOPMay 19, 1994 2:15 PM
Steve, Unix by design requires an orderly shutdown of the system, rather than merely pulling the plug. The file-systems are "marked" by the shutdown procedure so that they can be restarted safely/quicker when you boot the system. Otherwise, the boot procedure will run (almost) the equivalent of Disksalv on all of the file systems on startup. If you simply turn off the machine without the shutdown, upon reboot the system thinks it is restarting after a crash, and therefore assumes that things are not necessarily in one piece, which is why it needs to revalidate everything. On systems where reliability is very desirable (i.e., multi-user systems where file system problems can wreak real havoc), having this kind of safeguards designed in can be quite desirable. However, it does have its costs (as does most "protection" designs, like memory protection). – BobR (Motorola Inside!)
#41100From: Steve AhlstromMay 19, 1994 2:24 PM
Bob, Ok … that I know from playing quite a bit with an AT&T 3B1 for quite a while. Where does Dale's "potentially damaging the disk" line come from? Sounds flakey to me.
#41106From: Jim Nangano/SYSOPMay 19, 1994 6:38 PM
Not totally flakey. Unix systems tend to have lots of little tasks running in the background at all times, and they can (and do) access the disk whenever they want to, which means that powering down the system without a clean shutdown can (relatively easily) catch one of those tasks while it is writing to the disk. Just like the Amiga, losing power while a disk write is occurring is an easy way to scramble the file system. – BobR (Motorola Inside!)
#41107From: Steve AhlstromMay 19, 1994 7:20 PM
"Potentially damaging the disk" reads to me as if the OS will physically harm the hardware. If what was meant is what you explained … powering down while in the middle of a write will cause a software problem, well, that's rather obvious isn't it and has nothing to do with UNIX. So Dale, what is it? You saying that UNIX is detrimental to hardware?
#41102From: Steve AhlstromMay 19, 1994 3:03 PM
BTW, that's an _UGLY_ picture of you Betty uploaded to AmigaArts <grin>
#41105From: Jim Nangano/SYSOPMay 19, 1994 6:38 PM
That wasn't me – it was Steve P. in a BobR suit. 🙂 – BobR (Motorola Inside!)
#41125From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPMay 20, 1994 4:50 PM
Oh, suuuuuuure! Don't blame it on me! 😉 I left my BobR suit at home that trip. 🙂 🙂
#41108From: Betty Clay/SYSOPMay 19, 1994 7:29 PM
Steve, I didn't think it flattered Bob very much, either – but it was the only one I had! Incidentally – I didn't have one of you at all, else you'd have been in there, too. —Betty
#41109From: Steve AhlstromMay 19, 1994 8:52 PM
Betty, Maybe I'll send you one you can scan. BTW, the one of Bill Eastburn didn't get merged because something went wrong with the upload … from his mouth down was offset to the right.
#41115From: Betty Clay/SYSOPMay 20, 1994 12:51 AM
Thanks, Steve. I'd be glad to have it. And I'll try Bill again. The picture was pretty nice. I'll check the file on my disk, and if it isn't right, I'll re-scan it. I have six or eight more, but I'm not sure I have the names right on all of them. Maybe I could send them up and you, Bob, and Steve could help me straighten them out? And there are a few others of whom I'm sure of the names, but just didn't get them done in the first batch. Gee – we'll soon have a regular gallery of CIS Amiga folks. —Betty
#41116From: Steve AhlstromMay 20, 1994 1:16 AM
Upload 'em … I'll take a look and identify who I can.
#41126From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPMay 20, 1994 4:50 PM
I'll see if I can identify people you aren't able to. Did we get a group picture taken? I can't remember.
#41113From: Jim Nangano/SYSOPMay 19, 1994 11:14 PM
Betty, What do you expect, asking me to pose halfway through my first cup of coffee in the morning? And of course, it was following closely on the tail of a rather long night! Ahhh, Devcons – sure miss 'em! – BobR
#41127From: Betty Clay/SYSOPMay 20, 1994 7:59 PM
Given another opportunity, Bob – I'd be happy to do another shot and replace this one. Want to send me a better picture? —Betty
#41140From: Steve AhlstromMay 22, 1994 12:54 PM
Bob, >>pose halfway through my first cup of coffee in the morning … Hmmm, looked more like your 6th Bloody Mary <grinning and ducking> -sja
#41141From: Jim Nangano/SYSOPMay 22, 1994 6:28 PM
That was part of the preceeding "rather long night", 'cept I didn't have to disguise the booze with that red stuff. :-> – BobR (Motorola Inside!)
#41118From: Dale LarsonMay 20, 1994 5:16 AM
I'm sorry. Damaging the data on the disk, not the mechanism itself. You have to shutdown the system in software to flush all kinds of buffers, etc. You can do it in an emergency in about 20 seconds, more like a minute or two for a normal shutdown. — Dale L. Larson, Intangible Assets Manufacturing
#41093From: SyndesisMay 19, 1994 9:05 AM
If you want to play with Unix, you should really get Linux for a PC. 🙂 It's even free, not $120, and it works, and there's hundreds of hackers developing new toys for it.
#41095From: Steve AhlstromMay 19, 1994 10:32 AM
John, Yeah, but I want UNIX as opposed to Linux.
#41148From: Jay G PedersenMay 23, 1994 1:25 AM
From whom did you order this?? I am interested myself, and don't know of anyone selling the Amiga Unix software. Is this Amiga Unix release 2.1, unlimited license??? -Jay Pedersen
#41155From: Steve AhlstromMay 23, 1994 9:47 AM
Talk to your dealer (fast). CEI, a distributor, has a few packages left. After they're gone, they're gone.
#41221From: Jay G PedersenMay 27, 1994 2:55 PM
I believe I asked before, but, who did you order the Amiga Unix 2.1 unlimited license from??? My dealer is out of business. I contacted every dealer I found in Amiga World, only the Software Hut had Unix, but they had the 2-user license. Any help would be appreciated. -Jay Pedersen